The **BOXING** thread (Vol 3)
Discussion
Davos123 said:
There's no way Fury gets the decision if its a remotely competitive fight. That said, if it goes 12 rounds I doubt it'll have been remotely competitive, just Fury making Wilder look like a useless t
t until the final bell like he did with Klitschko. Wilder by decision feels really unlikely to me
Let's not pretend that that version of wlad was anything other than a distracted shell of the real wlad....the klitschko that fought aj...at 41 years old by the way... (fully focussed) would have cleaned furys clock...that's why he avoided the rematch..he lucked out against the worst version of wladimir. If fury had faced the wlad who fought haye he would have been starched... to call him a "useless tt until the final bell like he did with Klitschko. Wilder by decision feels really unlikely to met" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch Edited by tuscaneer on Tuesday 27th November 19:31
Edited by tuscaneer on Tuesday 27th November 19:32
Chad_Hugo said:
Do people see Tyson getting a decision against Wilder in LA if the fight is remotely close or competitive?
Unfortunately I don't. Thinking back to the scoring of Wilder vs Ortiz around 6 rounds in every judge had Wilder up on the cars didn't they? Considering Wilder for me had barely won a round at that point, I am not so optimistic of a point decision.
.
Only if it is a very wide margin that the home nation can't ge away with!!Unfortunately I don't. Thinking back to the scoring of Wilder vs Ortiz around 6 rounds in every judge had Wilder up on the cars didn't they? Considering Wilder for me had barely won a round at that point, I am not so optimistic of a point decision.
.
Read some interesting trivia today: Wilder got a bronze in the olympics after only 3 years of boxing, the guy Wilder lost to, had in the previous round beaten oleksandr usyk!
tuscaneer said:
Davos123 said:
There's no way Fury gets the decision if its a remotely competitive fight. That said, if it goes 12 rounds I doubt it'll have been remotely competitive, just Fury making Wilder look like a useless tt until the final bell like he did with Klitschko. Wilder by decision feels really unlikely to me
Let's not pretend that that version of wlad was anything other than a distracted shell of the real wlad....the klitschko that fought aj...at 41 years old by the way... (fully focussed) would have cleaned furys clock...that's why he avoided the rematch..he lucked out against the worst version of wladimir. If fury had faced the wlad who fought haye he would have been starched... to call him a "useless tt until the final bell like he did with Klitschko. Wilder by decision feels really unlikely to met" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch Gameface said:
Daniel1 said:
Fittster said:
Wasn't Fury also on PEDs when he fought Wlad?
Who isn't on PEDs in top level boxing
.....if by "top level boxing" you mean a slightly rotund 43 year old gentleman who gets knocked about a bit at the local gym....then yeah, i'm defo clean pal......wanna test me piss??
Edited by tuscaneer on Wednesday 28th November 11:29
I think with Fury, you also need to turn a blind eye to any 'cutting edge' ways that all this weight may have been lost so fast. As im suprised that it has happened so quick, perhaps it was normal ways.
But they say a Keto diet is good for weight loss, and Wild Boar is good protein
He is on the testing during camp so clean for this bit.
But they say a Keto diet is good for weight loss, and Wild Boar is good protein
He is on the testing during camp so clean for this bit.
tuscaneer said:
Let's not pretend that that version of wlad was anything other than a distracted shell of the real wlad....the klitschko that fought aj...at 41 years old by the way... (fully focussed) would have cleaned furys clock...that's why he avoided the rematch..he lucked out against the worst version of wladimir. If fury had faced the wlad who fought haye he would have been starched... to call him a "useless tt" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch
Not that you're a Klitschko fan-boy or anything...t" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch StuTheGrouch said:
tuscaneer said:
Let's not pretend that that version of wlad was anything other than a distracted shell of the real wlad....the klitschko that fought aj...at 41 years old by the way... (fully focussed) would have cleaned furys clock...that's why he avoided the rematch..he lucked out against the worst version of wladimir. If fury had faced the wlad who fought haye he would have been starched... to call him a "useless tt" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch
Not that you're a Klitschko fan-boy or anything...t" really is an absurd statement given all the elements In the equation.....he was never gonna rematch klitschko because he knew the inevitable result in a rematch hyphen said:
I think with Fury, you also need to turn a blind eye to any 'cutting edge' ways that all this weight may have been lost so fast. As im suprised that it has happened so quick, perhaps it was normal ways.
But they say a Keto diet is good for weight loss, and Wild Boar is good protein
He is on the testing during camp so clean for this bit.
10 stones in 1 year is mental!But they say a Keto diet is good for weight loss, and Wild Boar is good protein
He is on the testing during camp so clean for this bit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/boxing/46352885
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
piece of piss that!10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
...i could be down to 3 stone 10lb by next decembertuscaneer said:
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
piece of piss that!10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
...i could be down to 3 stone 10lb by next december- oifatty
dirty boy said:
tuscaneer said:
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
piece of piss that!10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
...i could be down to 3 stone 10lb by next december- oifatty
always fancied mixing it with all those mini flyweights from thailand and japan...it would be the one and only time i would ever enjoy a reach advantage!!
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
Apart from it being complete b10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
ks. He was bordering obese when he took the title in 2015. That was 265 odd. He looks like he gained about 50-60lb at his fattest and looking at him he was no 380lb! It's a made up story to make a few quid, sell a few papers and promote himself as this disciplined guru. He will get his ass handed to him in this fight.Burwood said:
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
Apart from it being complete b10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
ks. He was bordering obese when he took the title in 2015. That was 265 odd. He looks like he gained about 50-60lb at his fattest and looking at him he was no 380lb! It's a made up story to make a few quid, sell a few papers and promote himself as this disciplined guru. He will get his ass handed to him in this fight.I'd guestimate 7 stone max.
LoonyTunes said:
Burwood said:
dirty boy said:
Some colleagues and I were talking about this the other day and it's not really that remarkable.
10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
Apart from it being complete b10 stone, is 140lbs. 1lbs of fat is 3500 calories.
So 140 x 3500 is 490,000 calories over 365 days, is a calorie deficit of 1342 per day.
Not that remarkable for a 6'9" man who's becomes physcially active again.
Plus he'd have been carrying a lot of water in that frame with the fat.
Just saying lol!
ks. He was bordering obese when he took the title in 2015. That was 265 odd. He looks like he gained about 50-60lb at his fattest and looking at him he was no 380lb! It's a made up story to make a few quid, sell a few papers and promote himself as this disciplined guru. He will get his ass handed to him in this fight.I'd guestimate 7 stone max.
The Wlad that faced Joshua would have beat any heavyweight in the world not named AJ on that night..
The Wlad who lost to Fury obviously did not want to fight, there as something seriously wrong with him mentally that night, we will probably never know the exact reasons for his performance but the difference between Wlad who faced Fury and Wlad who faced AJ is so staggering that it can't be attributed to Fury alone, (if at all!).
I would be happy if Fury wins, my point regarding the scoring was simply that I don't at all see Fury knocking him out, and I don't see him outpointing Wilder in the dramatic way he did Wlad, the fight will be far more competitive, Wilder will have a much, much higher punch output/be more aggressive and that alone will make it closer so I don't see how Fury will get a decision.
The same way I don't see ANY boxer getting a decision against AJ in the UK, might sound cynical but I honestly don't and thats coming from a big fan of AJ too.
The Wlad who lost to Fury obviously did not want to fight, there as something seriously wrong with him mentally that night, we will probably never know the exact reasons for his performance but the difference between Wlad who faced Fury and Wlad who faced AJ is so staggering that it can't be attributed to Fury alone, (if at all!).
I would be happy if Fury wins, my point regarding the scoring was simply that I don't at all see Fury knocking him out, and I don't see him outpointing Wilder in the dramatic way he did Wlad, the fight will be far more competitive, Wilder will have a much, much higher punch output/be more aggressive and that alone will make it closer so I don't see how Fury will get a decision.
The same way I don't see ANY boxer getting a decision against AJ in the UK, might sound cynical but I honestly don't and thats coming from a big fan of AJ too.
Gassing Station | Sports | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff