The **BOXING** thread (Vol 4)
Discussion
Ex boxer Julius Francis lays out trouble maker with one punch. Will delete if not appropriate for this thread. (Actual occurrence is in last 15 or 20 secs of vid)
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/1...
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/1...
Edited by CoolHands on Tuesday 14th June 09:55
pincher said:
Entirely unnecessary - he'll be in a spot of bother for that I suspect. Not to mention probably out of a job.
I did think that the danger had past. Also a judge may take a dim view of his actions, behavior of the 'victim' notwithstanding, considering who Francis is and his skill etc. CoolHands said:
Ex boxer Julius Francis lays out trouble maker with one punch. Will delete if not appropriate for this thread. (Actual occurrence is in last 15 or 20 secs of vid)
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/1...
I've never heard of him, turns out that he fought Tyson during his comeback. The card looked quite good that evening! https://boxrec.com/en/event/16659https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/1...
Edited by CoolHands on Tuesday 14th June 09:55
I may well be wrong but that still looks like BandanaMan is pointing at Francis, not making a move to punch him.
In any case, surely the role of Security is to defuse a situation rather than inflame it? Self-defence is no argument here, given that nothing had actually been done to warrant a need to defend himself?
I'll be surprised in the police don't take a look at it given it's all over social media - it's an OTT reaction to a mouthy scrote giving it large.
In any case, surely the role of Security is to defuse a situation rather than inflame it? Self-defence is no argument here, given that nothing had actually been done to warrant a need to defend himself?
I'll be surprised in the police don't take a look at it given it's all over social media - it's an OTT reaction to a mouthy scrote giving it large.
Edited by pincher on Tuesday 14th June 13:31
He's going to have a fun time trying to claim self-defence when throwing the first punch in that interaction. Also i'm sceptical punching people is part of the training which they're given.
Looks to me like he decided it would be a good opportunity to get the boxing skills out from the glory days and shut the guy up / neutralise the situation as well in the process.
Looks to me like he decided it would be a good opportunity to get the boxing skills out from the glory days and shut the guy up / neutralise the situation as well in the process.
MrBogSmith said:
ttps://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/self-defence-and-prevention-crime will offer some legal insight in self-defence. It's a perfectly valid justification here.
I can't see him having any legal issues if he says what he needs to for an account (if he even needs to).
Not got time right now to read all that but a couple of early observations;I can't see him having any legal issues if he says what he needs to for an account (if he even needs to).
CPS said:
Self-defence is available as a defence to crimes committed by use of force.
Not sure that BandanaMan committed any crime(s)?CPS said:
The basic principles of self-defence are set out in Palmer v R, [1971] AC 814; approved in R v McInnes, 55 Cr App R 551:
"It is both good law and good sense that a man who is attacked may defend himself. It is both good law and good sense that he may do, but only do, what is reasonably necessary."
The common law approach as expressed in Palmer v R is also relevant to the application of section 3 Criminal Law Act 1967:
"A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large."
Wouldn't say that what Francis did was 'reasonably necessary' in this instance, nor do I think that reasonable force was employed. He is twice the size of the other guy and could easily of restrained him - one would assume that he has had training to deal with such a situation. He didn't make any attempt to de-escalate - just went straight for the KO."It is both good law and good sense that a man who is attacked may defend himself. It is both good law and good sense that he may do, but only do, what is reasonably necessary."
The common law approach as expressed in Palmer v R is also relevant to the application of section 3 Criminal Law Act 1967:
"A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large."
As I say, I haven't got time to read the whole thing and I am just a layman with no legal experience, so could well be very wide of the mark on this.
Gassing Station | Sports | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff