Gallas 'issued own-goal threat'

Gallas 'issued own-goal threat'

Author
Discussion

FourWheelDrift

Original Poster:

88,631 posts

285 months

Monday 4th September 2006
quotequote all
I don't care who he is or who he plays for words fail me as to express my hatred for somebody who might stoop to that low a level.

If true. I bet Arsenal are pleased to have a potential blackmailer in their squad. Pick me or I'll score an own goal rolleyes

BBC said:

Chelsea say they sold William Gallas because he threatened to score an own goal if he was selected for their first game of the season. The Stamford Bridge club have released a statement explaining their reasons for allowing the French defender to join Arsenal on transfer deadline day.

Gallas, 29, allegedly refused to play again for the Blues.

Chelsea claim he said he would score an own goal if he was forced to play against Manchester City on 20 August.

The statement says Gallas initially refused to play against Liverpool in last season's FA Cup semi-final and that, if selected to play against City, he threatened to score an own goal, get sent off or make deliberate mistakes.

Gallas was heavily criticised by Blues boss Jose Mourinho earlier in the summer when he failed to report for pre-season training on Chelsea' pre-season tour of America.

The full club statmement read: "Chelsea believes it is important for our supporters to be made aware of the full facts regarding William Gallas and the lack of respect he showed to the fans, the manager and the club.

"Despite leaving he continues to attack José Mourinho and this cannot be left unchallenged.

"Chelsea made William Gallas a very substantial and attractive new contract offer to stay towards the end of last season. This was rejected.

"The issue was purely one of money, despite his public comments that he wanted a new challenge, to play abroad and so forth. These were just a smokescreen to cover up the fact he was hawking himself to the highest bidder.

"Having failed to secure his demands, his position became increasingly intransigent and unacceptable.

"He initially refused to play against Liverpool in the FA Cup semi-final last season in an effort to force an increased contract offer.

"As is now well documented he refused to join up with the team in Los Angeles during pre-season, despite agreeing the dates for his return as the other World Cup players did, with the club.

"When Jose Mourinho generously offered him a way back into the 'family' after the American tour, this was thrown back in the Chelsea manager's face.

"The manager told him that, even if he did not agree a new contract but returned to the "family" and abided by the rules, he would still select the best players available and would not punish him playing wise.


He threatened that if he was forced to play, or if he was disciplined and financially punished for his breach of the rules, he could score an own goal or get himself sent off, or make deliberate mistakes

Chelsea statement on William Gallas

"However despite meetings to try and resolve the problems Gallas made it clear to Jose Mourinho he would never play for Chelsea again.

"Before the first game of the season against Manchester City, when only four defenders were available and John Terry was doubtful with an injury, he refused to play.

"He went on to threaten that if he was forced to play, or if he was disciplined and financially punished for his breach of the rules, that he could score an own goal or get himself sent off, or make deliberate mistakes.

"Clearly this was a totally unacceptable situation for the manager, the team and the club. So a collectively agreed solution in Chelsea's interests had to be found, hence his departure.

"Chelsea has a wage structure in place that is valued not only on the contribution of the player to the manager and the team, but also on a player's respect for the club and contribution to the promotion and image of the club off the field. Every player is expected to play their part in this.

"William Gallas rarely recognised these responsibilities.

"He also failed to recognise the role Jose Mourinho and Chelsea played in helping him become a double Premiership champion for a player whose only league title prior to that had been in the French Second Division."

Gallas has not responded to Chelsea's claims but when he initially told the Blues in May that he wanted to leave, he said it was because he wanted to "experience another league" and that his request was "not a question of money".


Edited for silly spooling mistooks.

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Tuesday 5th September 01:15

zoe22

856 posts

244 months

Monday 4th September 2006
quotequote all
:clap; Very mature rolleyes

The whole thing has been a good bit of business for Chelsea, get rid of a sulky-pants player, get arguably the best left back in the business for nice price and p*** one of your closest rivals off with the whole deal (whos to say he wont do the same thing to them?)

wolves_wanderer

12,396 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th September 2006
quotequote all
scratchchin Personally after seeing Chelsea's and Mourinho's lying, poaching and generally scummy antics I don't believe a word of this. They are trying to justify losing a player they could scarcely afford to by making it look like he was the problem.

planetdave

9,921 posts

254 months

Tuesday 5th September 2006
quotequote all
I, too, detect the odour of sour grapes.

Gallas might have said the words acredited to him but it's a bit like me saying I'm going to kill someone. I very rarely mean it.

OK; my real surname is Jordash and my patio is cracking under the strain.

panclan

880 posts

239 months

Tuesday 5th September 2006
quotequote all
If the remarks are true, why has it taken Chelsea so long to make this public, surley the club would of fined or suspended him? Possibly they could of taken him to an employment court from brech of contract.

To me it seems as though the Chelsea board and manager have thrown their toys out of the pram, because Gallas wanted to leave when the manager wanted to keep him. I can see this happening more and more as all the star names become frustated at not getting games each week.

From an Arsenal point of view I would say that Gallas in, and Cole out, has made the team stronger. Clichy has the potential to be better player than Cole when he returns from a long term injury.

From L'Equipe and the French coach

PARIS (Reuters) - France coach Raymond Domenech labelled Chelsea "scandalous" on Tuesday after the London club's claim that defender William Gallas threatened to score an own goal to force a move away from Stamford Bridge.

Gallas, now with Arsenal, denied the accusations earlier on Tuesday, accusing the Premier League champions of "having lots of money -- but no style".

The central defender, a key member of the France team that reached the World Cup final, is preparing for Wednesday's Euro 2008 clash against world champions Italy.

"It's a shame that Chelsea can say, think, or even imagine that Gallas would betray his team mates during a game," Domenech told reporters at France's Clairefontaine base.

"It's scandalous. William has proved over the years that he is loyal to his team mates. But I repeat, it's scandalous."

Gallas was sold to Arsenal last Thursday in exchange for England left back Ashley Cole and five million pounds ($9.52 million).

"I was adamant in my will to leave Chelsea, this is true," Gallas said in a statement to sports daily L'Equipe on Tuesday.

"But I'm surprised and shocked by Chelsea's comments. I never said that I would score an own goal if I had to play for Chelsea," he said.

"Some people are trying to explain my move (to Arsenal) thanks to cranky reproaches instead of assuming their own responsibilities in front of their fans," Gallas said.

"I have spent five years with Chelsea. I always gave the best of myself and I always proved that I had a great respect for the colours I wore. All this is really mean from Chelsea.

"But it doesn't surprise me as it comes from the club's new officials. Even if these people have a lot of money they lack style," he said.



Edited by panclan on Tuesday 5th September 19:16

antony moxey

8,121 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th September 2006
quotequote all
zoe22 said:
The whole thing has been a good bit of business for Chelsea .... get arguably the best left back in the business for nice price


Really? I thought they got Ashley Cole?

boRED S2upid

19,730 posts

241 months

Wednesday 6th September 2006
quotequote all
If this is true. And I would be very suprised if Chalsea hadn't exagerated it slightly. However, IF it is true then the FA should ban Gallas there is no point in issuing fines, even £250,000 would be nothing to these players. They know how much they can earn and can blackmail their club in such a manner and get away with it, he should have 6 month ban from the sport which still wouldn't be a sufficient punishment as it would just be a 6 month holiday with a huge signing on fee from a new club when he returns to the game.

Ive thought of a just punishment, community service being forced to play for Wrexham on a wind swept, sleet ridden November Wednesday night against Acrington Stanley without food for2 days before and a day after unless he scores the winning goal and gets us promoted.

Now whos with me? The revolution is just around the corner.