RE: Honda Civic Type R

RE: Honda Civic Type R

Author
Discussion

dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Monday 25th July 2005
quotequote all
__Lee__ said:
. . .
Most people who go on about the lack of torque crap have never even driven one. . . .


Lots of revs + good gearbox make good wheeltorque . . .



But I guess - and I'm around here for some 3 years - some people will never learn . . .

Have fun with the car!

sb-1

3,317 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
I am thinking about buying one of these.Has anyone that has actually drive a type R & a Mazda RX8 please comment.I would think these cars would be very similar,in a lot of ways.

Steve

trackdemon

12,193 posts

262 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
I've driven both and would say the Mazda is a nicer drive. Nice handling, decent power (although still lacking in torque, it doesn't have the all or nothing quality of the CTR) and a good driving position. CTR slightly more practical, but the RX8 is exceptional for a "coupe".

riggoletto

30 posts

209 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
I have owned a Type R now for quite a while and have got quite used to the way it drives. Since the first time that I got behind the wheel the car has never failed in putting a smile on my face. Has for the people on here who go on about it feeling slow, WHAT !! do you all drive supercars ? The CTR will blow away any of it's rivals if it is driven by someone who can drive one, properly. Some one got it spot on when someone went on about how little torque there is, Honda fitted it with 6 gears for a damm good reason and the positioning of the gear stick in the dash was'nt a coincidence either. Honda chose this set up to provide you with all the correct tools for creating smiles per miles !!

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
riggoletto said:
I have owned a Type R now for quite a while and have got quite used to the way it drives. Since the first time that I got behind the wheel the car has never failed in putting a smile on my face. Has for the people on here who go on about it feeling slow, WHAT !! do you all drive supercars ? The CTR will blow away any of it's rivals if it is driven by someone who can drive one, properly. Some one got it spot on when someone went on about how little torque there is, Honda fitted it with 6 gears for a damm good reason and the positioning of the gear stick in the dash was'nt a coincidence either. Honda chose this set up to provide you with all the correct tools for creating smiles per miles !!



Bloody hell man, CONGRATULATIONS!!!! For bringing up a thread that is 4 flipping years old! 29 pages long you'd think that an agreement had been established?

And it wouldn't 'blow away' a clio 182 as a matter of fact.

JimboCTR

290 posts

211 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
How old is this thread!

You have to remember the 182 came some time after the CTR. Then again if he didn't mean contemporary rivals then fair point.

Jim

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
Yeah I just assumed because he said 'any' of its rivals.

havoc

30,086 posts

236 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
I can only assume the DC2 ITR ISN'T 'one of it's rivals', as the DC2 is quicker on-road and on-track (empirically proven repeatedly by the Honda-R forum). So's the DC5 for that matter...

riggoletto

30 posts

209 months

Friday 22nd December 2006
quotequote all
[shout
polarbert said:
Bloody hell man, CONGRATULATIONS!!!! For bringing up a thread that is 4 flipping years old! 29 pages long you'd think that an agreement had been established?

And it wouldn't 'blow away' a clio 182 as a matter of fact.


It aint me that keeps going on about the Torque situation !!! And seeing has I am new to pistonheads ant have only just read all the threads I think that I am still entitled to give my view on any of them.

And as for not blowing awat the 182, ok it may not blow it away , But it certainly beats it in all areas, In MY opinion !!!

And the Clio cup 182 that decided he wanted some fun on the way to work, I dont think he would agree,or is that you ??



Edited by riggoletto on Friday 22 December 14:30



Edited by riggoletto on Friday 22 December 14:31

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Saturday 23rd December 2006
quotequote all

I don't have a cup, and thanks again for bringing up an old thread.

ehyouwhat

4,606 posts

219 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
riggoletto said:
And as for not blowing awat the 182, ok it may not blow it away , But it certainly beats it in all areas, In MY opinion !!!


I'm glad you added the "in MY opinion" at the end to differentiate from the facts of the matter. I'd say a nice 20mile circuit of fast A and B roads might show just how good something like a Clio 182 Trophy is. I would hazard a bet that the clio would be quicker than the CTR.

As with all these things the skills of the driver are often more important than the individual car, and in fact both of these machines are very, very good (and quite equal). But I think my cash would be heading towards Renault rather than Honda.

riggoletto

30 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
ehyouwhat said:
I'm glad you added the "in MY opinion" at the end to differentiate from the facts of the matter. I'd say a nice 20mile circuit of fast A and B roads might show just how good something like a Clio 182 Trophy is. I would hazard a bet that the clio would be quicker than the CTR.


Thanks for your comments but I do have something to back it up and if you watch you will see. I know it aint much by any stretch of my imagination but it is beaten by the CTR, and is being driven by someone whom I would be sure you would agree is a awesome driver. And he also gives his opinion, so it aint just mine!!
And can I stress I like the clio and always have, I used to want one ever since the early 16v, but to me it does'nt come close for build quality, reliability, and last but not least, POWER and PERFORMANCE.

So please watch this link and enjoy, www.youtube.com/watch?v=7taI8slbPq0


Edited by riggoletto on Tuesday 9th January 14:27



Edited by riggoletto on Tuesday 9th January 14:28

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
riggoletto said:
ehyouwhat said:
I'm glad you added the "in MY opinion" at the end to differentiate from the facts of the matter. I'd say a nice 20mile circuit of fast A and B roads might show just how good something like a Clio 182 Trophy is. I would hazard a bet that the clio would be quicker than the CTR.


Thanks for your comments but I do have something to back it up and if you watch you will see. I know it aint much by any stretch of my imagination but it is beaten by the CTR, and is being driven by someone whom I would be sure you would agree is a awesome driver. And he also gives his opinion, so it aint just mine!!
And can I stress I like the clio and always have, I used to want one ever since the early 16v, but to me it does'nt come close for build quality, reliability, and last but not least, POWER and PERFORMANCE.

So please watch this link and enjoy, www.youtube.com/watch?v=7taI8slbPq0



Right because 2 tenths of a second makes all the difference. rolleyes

And its not as if the extra power in the 'R' makes all that much difference because it weighs 100kgs more than the clio. Most people don't buy the cars to drive around the track all day long, so comparing them on a track isn't really relevant.

I really can't be bothered getting into an argument about these two very capable hot hatchs, but some of the things you are saying are not relevant.

I suppose the shoddy steering feel in the Type R wasn't an issue for you?



Edited by Polarbert on Tuesday 9th January 16:11

havoc

30,086 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Ooh it's started again.

I've driven 'em both. I didn't buy either. Bought a DC2 'teg instead, which combines the best points of both and looks miles better than either.

The Clio's steering feel is much better and it's damping/poise is superior to the CTR. But it's dampers are shock-ingly (See what I did there! ) badly made and liable to leak/fail. And the CTR is superior in most other regards - build & reliability, driving position, gearchange, braking, practicality...

The steering and handling poise, however, as in the Elise, are enough to lift the Clio above the CTR in a list of "purist driver's hot-hatches", although for most people I'd recommend the CTR.

riggoletto

30 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
polarbert said:
I suppose the shoddy steering feel in the Type R wasn't an issue for you?
No,has a matter of fact !! So check this out then if again it is'nt better www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtrP2YE57ow

See wins again !! CTR Rules, sorry !!


Edited by riggoletto on Tuesday 9th January 18:26

havoc

30,086 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
riggoletto said:
CTR Rules, sorry !!

Gotta be a troll...

...or maybe a chav. Hard to tell...

hehe

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
havoc said:
riggoletto said:
CTR Rules, sorry !!

Gotta be a troll...

...or maybe a chav. Hard to tell...

hehe




Could be both? Obviously isn't contributing anything else to this forum.

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
riggoletto said:
polarbert said:
I suppose the shoddy steering feel in the Type R wasn't an issue for you?
No,has a matter of fact !! So check this out then if again it is'nt better www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtrP2YE57ow

See wins again !! CTR Rules, sorry !!


Edited by riggoletto on Tuesday 9th January 18:26



Okay and now you've linked to a video with a Clio 172. Whats the point in that when we were talking about the 182?

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
Oh and I really should stop feeding the troll. I just can't help it. hehe

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
rofl Just watched that video and couldn't stop laughing. If you think thats real then you should look at the sky outside and reflect.