Contractors: IR35 & general discussion

Contractors: IR35 & general discussion

Author
Discussion

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
bing said:
I thought HRMC said that IF you stayed with existing client and then went inside IR35 they wouldn't chase for any back dated taxes from before April 2021? Or am I getting this wrong?
That’s not what they said. They said they wouldn’t investigate unless they had reason to consider the need to do so !
No.

The link says "The only reason HMRC will open an enquiry using information acquired through the off-payroll working rules changes is if there is reason to suspect fraud or criminal behaviour."
Exactly. They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
bing said:
I thought HRMC said that IF you stayed with existing client and then went inside IR35 they wouldn't chase for any back dated taxes from before April 2021? Or am I getting this wrong?
That’s not what they said. They said they wouldn’t investigate unless they had reason to consider the need to do so !
No.

The link says "The only reason HMRC will open an enquiry using information acquired through the off-payroll working rules changes is if there is reason to suspect fraud or criminal behaviour."
Exactly. They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
Incorrectly concluding the role is outside IR35 based on the information at hand at the time is not fraud nor is it criminal behaviour.

They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.

They can suggest / coerce / worry you in to volunteering to retrospective change your tax status for the last tax year. Potentially they could ask you to provide evidence of your original basis for the outside IR35 determination on which they may decide to investigate further, but they cant just assume you're guilty of fraud and bill you.


Edited by Deep Thought on Tuesday 9th March 21:29

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
bing said:
I thought HRMC said that IF you stayed with existing client and then went inside IR35 they wouldn't chase for any back dated taxes from before April 2021? Or am I getting this wrong?
That’s not what they said. They said they wouldn’t investigate unless they had reason to consider the need to do so !
No.

The link says "The only reason HMRC will open an enquiry using information acquired through the off-payroll working rules changes is if there is reason to suspect fraud or criminal behaviour."
Exactly. They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
Incorrectly concluding the role is outside IR35 based on the information at hand at the time and therefore acting in good faith is not fraud nor is it criminal behaviour.

They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.
No. They can and the do and they will.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
bing said:
I thought HRMC said that IF you stayed with existing client and then went inside IR35 they wouldn't chase for any back dated taxes from before April 2021? Or am I getting this wrong?
That’s not what they said. They said they wouldn’t investigate unless they had reason to consider the need to do so !
No.

The link says "The only reason HMRC will open an enquiry using information acquired through the off-payroll working rules changes is if there is reason to suspect fraud or criminal behaviour."
Exactly. They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
Incorrectly concluding the role is outside IR35 based on the information at hand at the time and therefore acting in good faith is not fraud nor is it criminal behaviour.

They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.
No. They can and the do and they will.
And your proof of that is...?

Because they cant even bill you as an individual. They have to pursue your limited company. If theres no funds in it, its nigh on impossible for them to recover the tax.

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
bing said:
I thought HRMC said that IF you stayed with existing client and then went inside IR35 they wouldn't chase for any back dated taxes from before April 2021? Or am I getting this wrong?
That’s not what they said. They said they wouldn’t investigate unless they had reason to consider the need to do so !
No.

The link says "The only reason HMRC will open an enquiry using information acquired through the off-payroll working rules changes is if there is reason to suspect fraud or criminal behaviour."
Exactly. They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
Incorrectly concluding the role is outside IR35 based on the information at hand at the time and therefore acting in good faith is not fraud nor is it criminal behaviour.

They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.
No. They can and the do and they will.
And your proof of that is...?

Because they cant even bill you as an individual. They have to pursue your limited company. If theres no funds in it, its nigh on impossible for them to recover the tax.
Where do you get this information from? Good luck.

In yesterday's update HMRC said it understood "mistakes could happen" and taxpayers would not face penalties for inaccuracies relating to the off-payroll working rules in the inaugural year of the rule changes.

The taxman said: "If we see that you have made a mistake, we will support you to understand how to apply the off-payroll working rules correctly...we will encourage you to self-correct errors before we consider if we need to intervene further."

But HMRC said it would also challenge "deliberately non-compliant customers" and would in certain cases publish details of defaulters to "encourage them to put their tax affairs in order".




Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Where do you get this information from? Good luck.

In yesterday's update HMRC said it understood "mistakes could happen" and taxpayers would not face penalties for inaccuracies relating to the off-payroll working rules in the inaugural year of the rule changes.

The taxman said: "If we see that you have made a mistake, we will support you to understand how to apply the off-payroll working rules correctly...we will encourage you to self-correct errors before we consider if we need to intervene further."

But HMRC said it would also challenge "deliberately non-compliant customers" and would in certain cases publish details of defaulters to "encourage them to put their tax affairs in order".

https://www.contractorcalculator.co.uk/ir35_taxes_uncollectable_company_has_no_money.aspx

Now wheres your "we suspect you might have lied so please send us thousands of pounds" letters evidence?

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Olivera

7,158 posts

240 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.

They can suggest / coerce / worry you in to volunteering to retrospective change your tax status for the last tax year. Potentially they could ask you to provide evidence of your original basis for the outside IR35 determination on which they may decide to investigate further, but they cant just assume you're guilty of fraud and bill you.
I would tend to agree with you that they cannot automatically assume fraud and would likely request further evidence.

However from this point onwards it would be prudent to have specialist legal representation to help you vet and prepare evidence for submission to HMRC. Then you're going to have a back and forth with HMRC for a significant period, and worst case scenario a bill or court case to attend. Whatever happens it's going to be a nerve wracking st show.

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
https://www.contractorcalculator.co.uk/ir35_taxes_...

Now wheres your "we suspect you might have lied so please send us thousands of pounds" letters evidence?
That article would strike fear into me if I was moving to an inside contract with the same client. The evidence is your acceptance of such a contract after being self determined outside.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Has anyone said, "lets trust HMRC"?

You said that based only on the record of you now being inside, when previously declared outside they could bill you for thousands.

Wheres your evidence of that?

Gazzab said:
They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.

We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
You then also said they could take your house and car.

Wheres your evidence of this?

Gazzab said:
They may take your house and car.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Olivera said:
Deep Thought said:
They cant simply "assume" or "suspect" you have not been honest in your ways and give you a bill.

They can suggest / coerce / worry you in to volunteering to retrospective change your tax status for the last tax year. Potentially they could ask you to provide evidence of your original basis for the outside IR35 determination on which they may decide to investigate further, but they cant just assume you're guilty of fraud and bill you.
I would tend to agree with you that they cannot automatically assume fraud and would likely request further evidence.

However from this point onwards it would be prudent to have specialist legal representation to help you vet and prepare evidence for submission to HMRC. Then you're going to have a back and forth with HMRC for a significant period, and worst case scenario a bill or court case to attend. Whatever happens it's going to be a nerve wracking st show.
Absolutely. Totally.

I havent said otherwise.

I am merely disputing what Gazzab said here.

Gazzab said:
They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.
We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
Has anyone said, "lets trust HMRC"?

You said that based only on the record of you now being inside, when previously declared outside they could bill you for thousands.

Wheres your evidence of that?

Gazzab said:
They get the records that say a) you always declared yourself outside and b) your client now defines you as inside.

We suspect you have previously not been honest about your ways or working and so we suspect fraud. Here’s a letter. Here’s a calc re what you owe us. Pay up or we’ll see you in court.
You then also said they could take your house and car.

Wheres your evidence of this?

Gazzab said:
They may take your house and car.
What are you talking about. The question is can they come after you for previous invalid outside self determination. Yes.
How will you pay the tax bill - might mean selling assets.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
https://www.contractorcalculator.co.uk/ir35_taxes_...

Now wheres your "we suspect you might have lied so please send us thousands of pounds" letters evidence?
That article would strike fear into me if I was moving to an inside contract with the same client. The evidence is your acceptance of such a contract after being self determined outside.
Agreed.

And noone has said otherwise. I wouldnt trust HMRC at all, however there is due process to follow and they have to pursue the ltd co, not the individual.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
What are you talking about. The question is can they come after you for previous invalid outside self determination. Yes.
How will you pay the tax bill - might mean selling assets.
No.

Wrong on both accounts.

They come after the limited company.

They cant take or force you to sell your home and car (except in very very limited circumstances).

Invalid <> fradulent.

So wheres your evidence to back up what you have said?

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
What are you talking about. The question is can they come after you for previous invalid outside self determination. Yes.
How will you pay the tax bill - might mean selling assets.
No.

Wrong on both accounts.

They come after the limited company.

They cant take or force you to sell your home and car (except in very very limited circumstances).

So wheres your evidence to back up what you have said?
Suggest you do some research.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
however there is due process to follow and they have to pursue the ltd co, not the individual.
My understanding is that they do have the power to pursue the directors of a company personally under certain circumstances, and those circumstances include unpaid taxes. Specifically PAYE.

sources:
https://www.aabrs.com/can-hmrc-hold-a-director-res...
https://www.companydebt.com/hmrc-tax-problems/can-...
https://bambury.info/business-tax/can-hmrc-hold-a-...
https://www.brettsbr.co.uk/hmrc-and-powers-to-purs...

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Deep Thought said:
however there is due process to follow and they have to pursue the ltd co, not the individual.
My understanding is that they do have the power to pursue the directors of a company personally under certain circumstances, and those circumstances include unpaid taxes. Specifically PAYE.

sources:
https://www.aabrs.com/can-hmrc-hold-a-director-res...
https://www.companydebt.com/hmrc-tax-problems/can-...
https://bambury.info/business-tax/can-hmrc-hold-a-...
https://www.brettsbr.co.uk/hmrc-and-powers-to-purs...
Those refer to unpaid, not incorrectly calculated.

This is whats pertinent to IR35.

https://www.contractorcalculator.co.uk/ir35_taxes_...

The exception would be if they tried to invoke Regulation 72.


Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
Gazzab said:
What are you talking about. The question is can they come after you for previous invalid outside self determination. Yes.
How will you pay the tax bill - might mean selling assets.
No.

Wrong on both accounts.

They come after the limited company.

They cant take or force you to sell your home and car (except in very very limited circumstances).

So wheres your evidence to back up what you have said?
Suggest you do some research.
You said it, you back it up. rolleyes

It is absolutely not a case of - we've had sight of your determination from the client, you determined yourself outside previously, we think you're a fraud, send us thousands of pounds or we'll take your house and car.




Edited by Deep Thought on Tuesday 9th March 22:18

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
You said it, you back it up. rolleyes
Just Google. ‘Sell my house to pay tax Bill’. There are, for example, many loan charge ‘victims’ who have sold their house to pay their tax bill.

Deep Thought

35,848 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th March 2021
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Deep Thought said:
You said it, you back it up. rolleyes
Just Google. ‘Sell my house to pay tax Bill’. There are, for example, many loan charge ‘victims’ who have sold their house to pay their tax bill.
Any tax bill regarding IR35 is not against the individual, it is against the limited company.

How many times have you to be told this?