E30 M3 prices

E30 M3 prices

Author
Discussion

e30m3Mark

16,205 posts

174 months

Monday 11th June 2018
quotequote all
E30_m3_ben said:
sat1s1ngh said:
Wow. Looking through this thread and reminds me why I never go to BMW gatherings. I would never want my M3 being investigated, or personally slated. I got it for the looks, the enjoyment, the whole package.

As you guys love going into details about owners, prices etc...I'd like to say I have never felt some uncomfortable in a car group.

Looking at e30 m3 threads on facebook for example there are bitter grown men who are upset about prices. (Some being very racist and opinionated)

You guys have lost a lot of respect from a fellow m3 owner.

Taken the fun out of the ownership.

Bring the class back and some of us might join you.

Dreading the day I have to sell mine. Its the owners who think they are helping the community but will make it very difficult to sell.


There's more to this world smile
There’s a lot of members on here who have owned their e30 m3 here for a very long time and some who have gone through a good few of them. Most of them on here do know what they are talking about. They have been following the prices for a very long time and some of them know the cars and give the heads up if there’s something wrong with it. If you don’t like it on here then jog on.
I had a brief flick back to see what he was talking about but nothing really stood out for me. There was the chap who questioned peoples opinions on values, then said how he'd bought a car for considerably less but declined posting a picture or giving any details. Maybe he meant him? I'm guessing it might be as simple as him owning one of the cars posted with more questionable history and/or condition though. I take it he's not going to come back and just tell us who he was on about?? Personally I've always found people here to be most helpful and certainly knowledgable.


Rich_W said:
M5 London said:
As per advert :

"1st reg uk, 23/4/1991. Was a well-known celebrity"

I think Chris Harris was 16 years old by my calculations...
The advert is a bit cackly written tbf.

Assuming they mean first owner was well known. How many well known people in '91 would have bought a E30M3? And not a 911?

I don't even know any particularly famous previous owners. Terry Rymer (motorcyclist) had one or 2 I think. Jay Kay had one, but I think he sold it, once he'd scratched the itch (which seems to be what he does)
I mailed and asked if they'd put us out of our misery and tell us?

sambusson

9 posts

82 months

Tuesday 12th June 2018
quotequote all
e30m3Mark said:
I mailed and asked if they'd put us out of our misery and tell us?
it was Bernie Eccleston smile

Rob747

226 posts

177 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
sambusson said:
it was Bernie Eccleston smile
Wow.

e30m3Mark

16,205 posts

174 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Rob747 said:
sambusson said:
it was Bernie Eccleston smile
Wow.
Would anyone really pay a premium because he was the first owner, or is it that the pedals would have less wear as he'd struggled to reach them?

200Plus Club

10,803 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Surely the seats will be marked with the slime he's oozed onto them?

An obnoxious little man and I think you'd need to be a complete F1 geek to want anything to do with it.

silentbrown

8,875 posts

117 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
Surely the seats will be marked with the slime he's oozed onto them?
Time for this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_FtEmkPIMk

200Plus Club

10,803 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
An unusual technique! :-)

CaymANTH

198 posts

108 months

Friday 15th June 2018
quotequote all
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

I don't get it. An excellent car is up for sale for about a year at a price which would scare most people off and now goes to auction with a guide price which is way too cheap.....auction houses shouldn't be allowed to use teaser guide prices just to get people to auctions. If that sells for £85k plus costs I'll eat my hat. That Black Series CLK also has a daft guide price too.....

Rich_W

12,548 posts

213 months

Saturday 16th June 2018
quotequote all
CaymANTH said:
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

I don't get it. An excellent car is up for sale for about a year at a price which would scare most people off and now goes to auction with a guide price which is way too cheap.....auction houses shouldn't be allowed to use teaser guide prices just to get people to auctions. If that sells for £85k plus costs I'll eat my hat. That Black Series CLK also has a daft guide price too.....
That's the Parkway Car?

It may have a reserve way in excess of the £85K but it might be a reality check on ACTUAL value to the dealer concerned! laugh

CLK Blacks are 60-70Ish AFAIK.
DTMs are in the 250K area!

surgical

93 posts

72 months

Saturday 16th June 2018
quotequote all
Very sorry I have not been active and away - really busy/ unwell at same time!

- random post about not liking this group or the scrutiny you feel of owning a bmw m3....

THIS IS A FANTASTIC source of information from everyone drawing their knowledge together and who would want someone to spend £100k on a banger? This group of enthusiasts seem to all look out for each other .. I can't see anybody here saying 'my car is better than yours'.... not going to entertain it anymore

- The one for auction at silverstone is the parkway car.. i recognise the car reg. when I asked them about it..
- what are peoples opinion of the car?...do you think it will sell../ sell for over 100 etc?
- I have bought at auction before where the estimate was half what I bought the car for..just to drum up interest..

2nd part... theoretically, if you wanted a 100k car... because I have never financed.. how do people here do this on here? if you are buying at auction you have to have the money ready sharpish.. has anyone got a finance package where they pay per month and refinance the balloon at end of say 5 years...? Just wondering how people may buy very expensive cars when they do not have the lump cash upfront?

Many thanks guys! - love the group and the intelligent people on here!

CaymANTH

198 posts

108 months

Saturday 16th June 2018
quotequote all

It's definitely the Parkway car, the reg is on the their website.

Although the bottom estimate plus costs would be £97k and change, I think it'll go for £115-120k inc auction fees, it looks a great car.

Now haven't got the cash to buy at either price but that CLk Black Series still keeps winking at me!






E30M3SE

8,469 posts

197 months

Saturday 16th June 2018
quotequote all
My 2p's worth, as a 83k mile SE owner, if Parkway had that car up for £ 100k they would have sold it, imo, I will be surprised if Silverstone net the owner(s) any more the £100k if that at all.
Looks like a nice car yes but as a collector, which I am not, I'd want a lower mileage car with a more consistent MOT history, certainly would want to see advisories for tyres worn close to the legal limit and rear subframe bushes worn...



H98NRD BMW M3

Check another vehicle
Colour Black
Fuel type Petrol
Date registered 31 December 1991
MOT valid until 16 April 2019

Date tested 17 April 2018
Pass
Mileage 127,761 km
MOT test number 5891 0842 6706
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 16 April 2019
Date tested 15 January 2017
Pass
Mileage 127,531 km
MOT test number 5152 1843 0041
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 14 January 2018

Date tested 4 February 2011
Pass
Mileage 126,867 km
MOT test number 4971 5523 1074
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 3 February 2012
Advisory notice item(s)

Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
front number plate cracked
clutch creeps intermittantly, poss hydraulic fault.
rear diff bushes worn


Date tested 17 December 2009
Pass
Mileage 12,634 km
MOT test number 5726 1185 9334
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 16 December 2010
Advisory notice item(s)

Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Date tested 9 December 2009
Fail
Mileage 12,634 km
MOT test number 2348 3304 9323
Test location unavailable until further notice
Reason(s) for failure

Exhaust emissions hydrocarbon content excessive (7.3.B.1b)

Advisory notice item(s)

Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)


Date tested 7 April 2007
Pass
Mileage 122,743 km
MOT test number 2418 2769 7044
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 6 April 2008
Date tested 27 August 2005
Pass
Mileage 121,579 miles
MOT test number 8013 8953 5204
Test location unavailable until further notice
Expiry date 26 August 2006



Rich_W

12,548 posts

213 months

Saturday 16th June 2018
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Looks like a nice car yes but as a collector, which I am not, I'd want a lower mileage car with a more consistent MOT history, certainly would want to see advisories for tyres worn close to the legal limit and rear subframe bushes worn...
Huge gaps in there! eek

surgical

93 posts

72 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I think I agree with you regarding you regarding history of the car etc. need a good solid record.

when MOT flags..'rear sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement'...does this mean the car has been tracked?

Just hard to find a good/well looked after one with low miles. I remember one came up for sale for ~£180k...3k km on clock... sold on the day.

E30M3SE

8,469 posts

197 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
surgical said:
...............
when MOT flags..'rear sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement'...does this mean the car has been tracked?
...........
Not necessarily no. The RTAB's will wear and deteriorate on a car used exclusively on the road or indeed on a 'garage queen'. They are made of rubber and the rubber will dry out and crack and perish over time, this will lead to movement.
What it does possibly suggest is a lack of preventative maintenance for these items to be advised on a MOT test given that a MOT is a minimum standard of road worthiness.



surgical

93 posts

72 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
great makes sense. Prob has stood still for a while being as 79,000 miles over 30 odd years..
better than seeing 'excessively corroded' not he report..

Rob747

226 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
These cars like to be driven, putting them away for months or years on end can cause issues, specifically poor running and as mentioned suspension bush issues.

They are very strong cars by design, it’s just that the design isn’t very modern.

Having bought and restored one, if I wanted one to drive rather than just show, I’d buy one that was being used regularly.

surgical

93 posts

72 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Rob747 said:
These cars like to be driven, putting them away for months or years on end can cause issues, specifically poor running and as mentioned suspension bush issues.

They are very strong cars by design, it’s just that the design isn’t very modern.

Having bought and restored one, if I wanted one to drive rather than just show, I’d buy one that was being used regularly.
Good to know mate! Can you tell us a bit more about the restoration? what did you have done? etc

I am open to getting a bog standard m3 and 'upgrading' it to how i want and also make it more useable for daily..any suggestions on what you would modify?

e30m3Mark

16,205 posts

174 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I would rather have a car that has seen a race track over one that has sat idle for long periods. Most people I know (who track their cars) take good care of them and do things like oil changes before and/or after events.

Whilst it's nice for those of us that own cars, it's a shame that values keep so many from being used as intended. I can only think of a couple of people who still track their Evo's.

What mods you do will really depend on a) what you intend using your car for? and b) what your budget is?

surgical

93 posts

72 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
e30m3Mark said:
I would rather have a car that has seen a race track over one that has sat idle for long periods. Most people I know (who track their cars) take good care of them and do things like oil changes before and/or after events.

Whilst it's nice for those of us that own cars, it's a shame that values keep so many from being used as intended. I can only think of a couple of people who still track their Evo's.

What mods you do will really depend on a) what you intend using your car for? and b) what your budget is?
I hear you. I wasn't intending to use on track but for the odd sprint here n there. Nice sports exhaust etc. suspension upgrade if needed.. things that would improve the experience of the drive..