Anyone driven E46 M3 and Evo VIII?

Anyone driven E46 M3 and Evo VIII?

Author
Discussion

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Sunday 23rd September 2007
quotequote all
I'm in the market for either a manual M3 or an Evo VIII. I know the Evo but haven't driven an E46 M3 (only the E36 version) and wondered how they compared on the road/track.

I'd be interested to know any opinions from people who have driven both or if there is a previous post I couls look at perhaps someone would point me in the right direction!

Thanks in advnce

Bill

paoloh

8,617 posts

205 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
They are just so different.....

M3 has all the luxuries and is still very quick but not as quick as a top end 8. There is another issue, what BHP evo?

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
paoloh said:
There is another issue, what BHP evo?
Thanks for the reply

My budget will allow me to buy a fairly basic VIII (probably an import GSR) and upgrade to around 400 bhp (approx 300 ATW because of the 4WD power loss)

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
I was also interested to see if anyone has compared them on either A roads or twisty B roads and what the verdict was - the Evo is certainly no motorway cruiser but comes into it's own when ther's proper driving to be done...

As I have an Evo IV I'm also used to crippling service costs, poor mpg and outrageous insurance so no worries there!

Bill

Edited by madgerald on Monday 24th September 09:54

belleair302

6,847 posts

208 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
The BM is a more solid drive, less 'on the edge' and better as an all round form of transport. There is also a much deeper feel to the car and its engine.

The Evo is faster, but less well rounded. better steering, but not as simple to drive when wanting to relax or commute, or slide around!

The Evo is more of a toy, expensive one at that, where the BM is something more organic, requires a deeper involvement and grows on you more.

Ever wondered why so may Evo's are on sale with limited mileage....impossible to live with!!!

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
belleair302 said:
The BM is a more solid drive, less 'on the edge' and better as an all round form of transport. There is also a much deeper feel to the car and its engine.

The Evo is faster, but less well rounded. better steering, but not as simple to drive when wanting to relax or commute, or slide around!

The Evo is more of a toy, expensive one at that, where the BM is something more organic, requires a deeper involvement and grows on you more.

Ever wondered why so may Evo's are on sale with limited mileage....impossible to live with!!!
I'm well aware of the limitations of the Evo - I've done 35k miles in the last 3 years and used the car as an everyday vehicle. I was interested to see the comment about the M3 gowing on you more - I'm expecting it to be a bit more subtle and less manic then the VIII. One thing I do love about the Evo is the steering though...

Hmmm I obviously need to test drive an M3!

belleair302

6,847 posts

208 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
The M3 is something you can leave as standard, improve performance wise and develop a relationship with....and Evo is something you drive and walk away from. BM's are also easier to service and can be driven quickly without attracting attention.

E46CSL+E92M3

73 posts

200 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
I have owned both of these vehicles and have to advise you that you will get bored of the Mitsy realy quickly, people will frown upon you when you blast it through your local town at 25mph (rear Baffel removed)sounding like your doing 100 mph. When you close the door and it rattles, shakes your back teeth out when you drive over a rabbit dropping, get the boy racers try to race you at every set of lights you pull away from...... Then there's the Beemer, Close the door with a nice solid clunk, can be driven as slowly and comfotabley as you like and can be driven hard and will put up with serious track abuse all day, every day. sounds and looks destinctive, just a better car all round....buy a beemer and spend the extra cash on a car that will still be built well in ten years against a low budget Jap tub that has the build quality from Taiwan.... Best of luck.!

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
you will get bored of the Mitsy realy quickly, people will frown upon you when you blast it through your local town at 25mph (rear Baffel removed)sounding like your doing 100 mph. When you close the door and it rattles, shakes your back teeth out when you drive over a rabbit dropping, get the boy racers try to race you at every set of lights you pull away from......
Have to say not noticed any of the above in 3 years of ownership - not bored with it, no funny looks, no rattles and boy racers don't bother me (I'm 40 and live in Surrey!). The suspension is a bit harsh but hey, you can't have everything...

Plantins

161 posts

201 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
I've not driven an Evo but had a Jap imported Subaru STI version 7, similar performance to the Evo. I now have an e46 M3, I was going to get a 911 C4's but couldn't justify paying double the money for what is not double the car, anyway forget that, the M3 is a very capable car and has more than enough grip around the twistys for anyone unless you go around driving like a maniac, the M3 is also alot more refined than the Evo would be and a more enjoyable drive getting from A to B, the Evo's are quick but alot harder ride and are more raw rather than refined. The Evo would arguably get you from A to B quicker but it's how the M3 gets you there that was one of the key factors for me in choosing a car. Also the build quality is alot better and reassuring when you are out enjoying yourself, at the end of the day it's personal choice and what you want from the car.

E46CSL+E92M3

73 posts

200 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
madgerald said:
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
you will get bored of the Mitsy realy quickly, people will frown upon you when you blast it through your local town at 25mph (rear Baffel removed)sounding like your doing 100 mph. When you close the door and it rattles, shakes your back teeth out when you drive over a rabbit dropping, get the boy racers try to race you at every set of lights you pull away from......
(I'm 40 and live in Surrey!).
Say no more old chap!biglaugh have you ever tested a Rover sterling?!biggrin
The Evo is great value and cheap horse power, the E46 is now great value and can be bought for the same kind of money, have never seen a Evo 8 for sale with 85k on the clock though, they usualy by that time of life have had 5 or 6 sets of brakes, 2 or 3 engines, numerous cluches, the odd bit of interior trim that fell off and five 40 year old owners from surrey! byebye

Edited by E46CSL+E92M3 on Tuesday 25th September 16:17

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
Say no more old chap!biglaugh have you ever tested a Rover sterling?!biggrin
Don't take the p*ss!

E46CSL+E92M3 said:
...have never seen a Evo 8 for sale with 85k on the clock though
That's because they're only 3 or 4 years old!!! 85k would be VERY high mileage...

E46CSL+E92M3 said:
they usualy by that time of life have had five 40 year old owners from surrey!
See my first comment...

E46CSL+E92M3

73 posts

200 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
madgerald said:
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
Say no more old chap!biglaugh have you ever tested a Rover sterling?!biggrin
Don't take the p*ss!

E46CSL+E92M3 said:
...have never seen a Evo 8 for sale with 85k on the clock though
That's because they're only 3 or 4 years old!!! 85k would be VERY high mileage...

E46CSL+E92M3 said:
they usualy by that time of life have had five 40 year old owners from surrey!
See my first comment...
My M3 Has done 57k, drives like new, my Evo had done 22K when i sold it, drove like a ragged XR3i, then again that could be how some people look at the EVO...laugh

If you want some pictures of my M3 E46 04/04 Carbon black/red imola with all the extras and want to have a look at it email me via this site...

Hope that can be of help!byebye

Edited by E46CSL+E92M3 on Tuesday 25th September 17:45

housemaster

2,076 posts

228 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
So you have an E46 M3, an E46 CSL and an E92 M3?

GravelBen

15,695 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th September 2007
quotequote all
I have an NZ Autocar mag test between the E46 M3 CSL and the Evo IX which I can probably scan for you if you like?

Basically their conclusion was Evo is quicker at lower speeds but the CSL would have the edge on top-end, the Evo is faster on bumpy twisty b-roads (especially in the wet) but the CSL is a more involving drive and only really loses out on corner exit traction. CSL is much more special and nicer interior etc, but as a second hand CSL is more than double the cost of a new Evo IX here they gave the win as the 'logical choice'.


(They did also mention that dynamically the Evo would leave a regular E46 M3 for dead)

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th September 2007
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
I have an NZ Autocar mag test between the E46 M3 CSL and the Evo IX which I can probably scan for you if you like?

Basically their conclusion was Evo is quicker at lower speeds but the CSL would have the edge on top-end, the Evo is faster on bumpy twisty b-roads (especially in the wet) but the CSL is a more involving drive and only really loses out on corner exit traction. CSL is much more special and nicer interior etc, but as a second hand CSL is more than double the cost of a new Evo IX here they gave the win as the 'logical choice'.


(They did also mention that dynamically the Evo would leave a regular E46 M3 for dead)
That would make interesting reading however I can't afford either the IX or the CSL! smile

madgerald

Original Poster:

8 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th September 2007
quotequote all
I started a similar thread on the Mitsubishi Lancer Register BTW - lots of interesting replies there including people who have owned both...

http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?s=&am...

I reckon I'll end up with the Evo VIII although I'll test drive the M3 first

Thanks for all the replies

smile

Bill

E46CSL+E92M3

73 posts

200 months

Thursday 27th September 2007
quotequote all
housemaster said:
So you have an E46 M3, an E46 CSL and an E92 M3?
Yep!biggrin

housemaster

2,076 posts

228 months

Thursday 27th September 2007
quotequote all
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
housemaster said:
So you have an E46 M3, an E46 CSL and an E92 M3?
Yep!biggrin
I believe that as much as I believe you have a CSL with 404bhp, via nothing more than a chip..

paoloh

8,617 posts

205 months

Thursday 27th September 2007
quotequote all
housemaster said:
E46CSL+E92M3 said:
housemaster said:
So you have an E46 M3, an E46 CSL and an E92 M3?
Yep!biggrin
I believe that as much as I believe you have a CSL with 404bhp, via nothing more than a chip..
A chip that gives a CSL 40 bhp extra... Why didn'y they just fit that to the standard M3 and hey presto, a CSL????