Should I wait for the M DSG of the E92?

Should I wait for the M DSG of the E92?

Author
Discussion

bher

Original Poster:

786 posts

271 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
As already posted, I am thinking ordering a E92.
Dealer told me this morning that M DSG is for april 08.
To my question about positive and negative aspects, he told me:
+: Eat less clutch, "à la mode", easier in town
-: Manoeuvers were difficult with previous one

What do you think?

taffyracer

2,093 posts

244 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
the last one was superb and it was always crap in auto mode, wouldn't expect the new one to be much better, personally I would wait, the M manuals have always been notchy so no real pleasure from having a manual IMO

NS24

1,113 posts

240 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
If it's DSG as per VAG's DSG then it should be great.

Does the M5 now have DSG - or is that just US models?

bher

Original Poster:

786 posts

271 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
NS24 said:
If it's DSG as per VAG's DSG then it should be great.

Does the M5 now have DSG - or is that just US models?
According to the dealer, the current M5 dsg is not that good mainly while parking the car due to difficult dosing of throttle at low speed..(euro model)

rassi

2,453 posts

252 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
bher said:
NS24 said:
If it's DSG as per VAG's DSG then it should be great.

Does the M5 now have DSG - or is that just US models?
According to the dealer, the current M5 dsg is not that good mainly while parking the car due to difficult dosing of throttle at low speed..(euro model)
Can we just agree that the current M5 has SMG III, and not DSG?

bher

Original Poster:

786 posts

271 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
rassi said:
Can we just agree that the current M5 has SMG III, and not DSG?
Yes I agree. wink

Vixpy1

42,624 posts

265 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
bher said:
rassi said:
Can we just agree that the current M5 has SMG III, and not DSG?
Yes I agree. wink
and me, afaik

waremark

3,242 posts

214 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
Disappointing but typical how little knowledge dealer personnel have. Way back when, when I had read that the car was to have DSG, the dealer did not even know that.

As it is BMW's first DSG, experience with any previous BM's is not relevant. VW DSG's are brilliant (I have driven it in a Golf GTi and an A3, reviews have been great for the Veyron version).

In the cars I drove, manoeuvering was easy. The car was almost identical to a good conventional automatic to drive. The only difference was that it responded instantly to manual changes, rather than with a slight delay, as a conventional automatic does.

I have decided to wait for a DSG car. I think it will be faster, more economical, and smoother than a manual, but less satisfying to drive because it will be too easy. A concern is that BMW will not get the gearbox quite right first time out. Examples of not getting things right first time are the original SMG and early iDrive systems (still bad in my opinion, but not quite as bad). Hopefully, however, software upgrades will be all it takes to sort out any problems.

outnumbered

4,088 posts

235 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all

There's no real problem with low speed manouevring with SMG-II, if you have any appreciable skill with operating a car at all. You just need a gentle right foot... I've not heard of SMG-III being any worse either.

Aa others point out, the performance of SMG is going to be quite different from the rumoured dual-clutch transmission in the E92 anyway.


Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Tuesday 11th December 2007
quotequote all
What on Earth did this idiot mean by "manoeuvres were more difficult with the previous one"?

NS24

1,113 posts

240 months

Tuesday 11th December 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
What on Earth did this idiot mean by "manoeuvres were more difficult with the previous one"?
That was the reason for replacing their receptionist.


Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Tuesday 11th December 2007
quotequote all
bher said:
NS24 said:
If it's DSG as per VAG's DSG then it should be great.

Does the M5 now have DSG - or is that just US models?
According to the dealer, the current M5 dsg is not that good mainly while parking the car due to difficult dosing of throttle at low speed..(euro model)
The M5 has SMG, not DCT, but may change next year. Only a clumsy oaf would have trouble parking it. I live on a steep hill and have no trouble whatsoever.

edb49

1,652 posts

206 months

Wednesday 12th December 2007
quotequote all
It's simple really. If you prefer paddles then wait for the MDCT, otherwise put your money down on a manual.

macca

508 posts

280 months

Thursday 13th December 2007
quotequote all
taffyracer said:
the last one was superb and it was always crap in auto mode, wouldn't expect the new one to be much better, personally I would wait, the M manuals have always been notchy so no real pleasure from having a manual IMO
E92 is not notchy like the e46 (or at least the one I've been playing with isn't).

What kind of lead time are you expecting if you wait for the auto? There are manuals in the system for delivery in February (ordered mine on Monday, build start date is 8 Jan, delivery early Feb).

bher

Original Poster:

786 posts

271 months

Thursday 13th December 2007
quotequote all
macca said:
What kind of lead time are you expecting if you wait for the auto? There are manuals in the system for delivery in February (ordered mine on Monday, build start date is 8 Jan, delivery early Feb).
In Belgium, dealer told me it will be there officially in march then say april for test and review then I will have to wait on the list after the DSG already on order (people ordering before launch) so he said expect july/august according to succes...

Otherwise if I had ordered it last visit (2 weeks ago) it was build on first week of jan for delivery as yours (because I pick the open roof, dealer told me that the carbon roof was a 6 months delay due to production problem from "carbon" factory)

I am quite convince by the manual but as I am new to BMW I just wanted to explore my choice. The answer I was fearing was "Everybody WAIT for the dsg and only non connaisseurs go straight to the manual, which had explain the rapid delay for delivery"
Now that the answers are balanced I am confident with my choice.

On the other hand I am still hesitating for the wheels: 18" vs 19"?
I red that both exist in silver or darker grey? Is it true? I have seen the 18 in medium grey and the 19" in silver.


macca

508 posts

280 months

Friday 14th December 2007
quotequote all
bher, imo go for 19's, they set the car off and will help when you come to sell. The ride is a little harder but not as hard as the e46 with 19's.

18's look darker but I've not seen them close up - I suspect they are painted. 19's are two tone (coloured inner edges and polished face - all lacquered). Keep away from kerbs, they will damage easily and the only way to repair them is by machining the face and relacquering. Once damaged, water gets under the lacquer and they go milky.