Irrespective of brand affinity/cost, which is your fav?

Irrespective of brand affinity/cost, which is your fav?

Author
Discussion

Barchettaman

6,325 posts

133 months

Saturday 15th February 2020
quotequote all


For £415 lightly-used, this seems to tick all the boxes for me. At about 5% of the cost of a Sub it definitely makes it difficult to justify the purchase of a Rolex.

CardShark

4,195 posts

180 months

Saturday 15th February 2020
quotequote all
Stuart70 said:
Odd is it not, the whole point of the crown being on the other side is so that you can access it with the fingers of your other hand? Sinn then remove that ability. Ah well, definitely one of the first world problems. Thanks for replying....
Another way of looking at it is that once the watch is set and running the crown becomes redundant when the watch is being worn, therefore placing it somewhere as unintrusive as possible becomes... possible.

Plenty of manufacturers place the crown and pushers somewhere other than the usual 3 o'clock/RHS of the case. It helps to prevent accidental damage, snagging, accidental operation of the pushers when the wrist is flexed, comfort (the crown won't dig in to the hand when flexed) and, I seem to remember, it also makes it easier to hold and aim a rifle - when prone - and operate the chrono function at the same time though my google-foo seems to have left me tonight and I can't find the article biggrin Some watches are designed with Special Forces operations in mind, in fact it's not unknown for such Forces to have a hand in the design of the watch.

Ultimately it's all a game of marginal gains however, if a gain is there to be had when designing a proper tool watch, it would be daft not to take it.

Edit to add a review of the EZM13 by 'bazza' who's one of our sub-forum contributors, the EZM1 posted earlier in the thread shares some of the features.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f-A8qPlQnY&t=...



Edited by CardShark on Saturday 15th February 21:44

lostkiwi

4,584 posts

125 months

Saturday 15th February 2020
quotequote all
I don't have any one watch that's a favourite.
However these ones see more use than the others:
1. Bulova Military Heritage

Love simple dial and ease of reading and being a 262khz version has a lovely smooth sweep.

2. Magrette Kara Anniversary:

Titanium, 500m water resistance and just a great watch to wear.

3. Panerai 111

Again the clarity and simplicity of the dial are what do it for me.

4. Longines Avigation A7:

It's huge (50mm) but harks back to the time when wrist watches were pocket watches on a strap. Mono pusher, in house movement, very different to the norm and purpose built for the early days of flight.

5. Mühle Glasshutte Big 29er:

Again clarity of dial and ease of reading coupled to a level of finish that is just incredible.

6. Graham Chronofighter Tech Seal:

Just look at it. Quirky, function above form carried to the extreme. Super legible and just so different.

These are the favourites but they aren't in any particular order - they all have their place in the collection and reasons for being favourites. I would struggle to choose any one above the others.

There are another 20 odd in the collection that don't get much time compared to these 6.

benny.c

3,485 posts

208 months

Saturday 15th February 2020
quotequote all
My favourite from my collection is the Linde Werdelin SpidoSpeed. I know it’s a Marmite watch and the majority will probably dislike it but it’s just so different from anything else I’ve owned. I love the quality of the finish and the overall engineered look. The multi layered dial is fantastic but is hard to capture in photos which don’t really do it justice.

Although it’s not a subtle watch, swapping between the brown croc strap, rubber and calfskin does alter the look and it can look “almost” smart. The way it wraps around the wrist is very comfortable and a lug to lug of less than 50mm means it doesn’t look as big as the dimensions would suggest.





Edited by benny.c on Saturday 15th February 22:31

NDA

21,640 posts

226 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Hang On said:
Not everyone’s cup of tea but it is this one for me. Although a very recent addition, this is my favourite watch by a country mile. I cba selling of the rest of my collection but if I were starting again I think I would be content with this as an ‘only watch’.

My current favourite watch.... I've often thought of buying one in exactly this spec, it's a classic and most definitely a 'one watch' where you could sell everything else.

A lovely thing.

tertius

6,858 posts

231 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Kettmark said:
Hang On said:
Not everyone’s cup of tea but it is this one for me. Although a very recent addition, this is my favourite watch by a country mile. I cba selling of the rest of my collection but if I were starting again I think I would be content with this as an ‘only watch’.

Can't understand anyone not liking that. I'm looking to treat myself with one like that for an impending special occasion.
Blue background really suits those rolexs
Roman numerals, mismatched date wheel, cyclops, fluted bezel all complete non-nos for me. All of course completely irrelevant to those who like it.

Stuart70

3,936 posts

184 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
CardShark said:
Stuart70 said:
Odd is it not, the whole point of the crown being on the other side is so that you can access it with the fingers of your other hand? Sinn then remove that ability. Ah well, definitely one of the first world problems. Thanks for replying....
Another way of looking at it is that once the watch is set and running the crown becomes redundant when the watch is being worn, therefore placing it somewhere as unintrusive as possible becomes... possible.

Plenty of manufacturers place the crown and pushers somewhere other than the usual 3 o'clock/RHS of the case. It helps to prevent accidental damage, snagging, accidental operation of the pushers when the wrist is flexed, comfort (the crown won't dig in to the hand when flexed) and, I seem to remember, it also makes it easier to hold and aim a rifle - when prone - and operate the chrono function at the same time though my google-foo seems to have left me tonight and I can't find the article biggrin Some watches are designed with Special Forces operations in mind, in fact it's not unknown for such Forces to have a hand in the design of the watch.

Ultimately it's all a game of marginal gains however, if a gain is there to be had when designing a proper tool watch, it would be daft not to take it.

Edit to add a review of the EZM13 by 'bazza' who's one of our sub-forum contributors, the EZM1 posted earlier in the thread shares some of the features.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f-A8qPlQnY&t=...



Edited by CardShark on Saturday 15th February 21:44
Thanks chap, all good stuff. I think the origin of the “normal” position would be from manual winding - where there was not the “set and leave’’ option - with “normal” position it could be wound without removing the watch from the wrist.

Fully understand that in the days of battery and automatic watches that this becomes an irrelevance, but broadly remains a tradition. Anyway, enough off thread waffle from me.

wisbech

2,982 posts

122 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Hang On said:
AndrewCrown said:
I suspect that one is white gold...can you confirm HO
White gold it is. Ref 228239.
Ah, in that case I prefer them in non stealth yellow gold full fat corrupt dictator mode.

AlexC1981

4,931 posts

218 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Stunters said:
Probably this one for me: Farer Lander Chronograph.
I love the dial, and now I've put it on this chestnut barenia leather sports strap like it even more

That's really nice. I just had a look on the Farer website and they have some lovely vintage inspired designs.

NDA

21,640 posts

226 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
tertius said:
Roman numerals, mismatched date wheel, cyclops, fluted bezel all complete non-nos for me. All of course completely irrelevant to those who like it.
It's a bit like complaining that a Rolls Royce has the Spirit of Ecstasy on the bonnet. smile

The Day Date is an iconic watch and those attributes (including the unique strap) are what make it so.

It is clearly a Rolex and for some, that's not a good thing.

lostkiwi

4,584 posts

125 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
NDA said:
tertius said:
Roman numerals, mismatched date wheel, cyclops, fluted bezel all complete non-nos for me. All of course completely irrelevant to those who like it.
It's a bit like complaining that a Rolls Royce has the Spirit of Ecstasy on the bonnet. smile

The Day Date is an iconic watch and those attributes (including the unique strap) are what make it so.

It is clearly a Rolex and for some, that's not a good thing.
Sorry - I'm with Tertius. That dial is awful.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
NDA said:
My current favourite watch.... I've often thought of buying one in exactly this spec, it's a classic and most definitely a 'one watch' where you could sell everything else.

A lovely thing.
I think we have similar preferences in that regard. (Saw that cracking shot of your Sky Dweller). The blue laser cut sunburst dials are quite special. That said, it was a tough choice between the Blue and the Olive Green when I put them side by side.


Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 16th February 11:08

Hoofy

76,423 posts

283 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Probably one of my cheaper watches. The Maranez Layan Brass.


tertius

6,858 posts

231 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
NDA said:
tertius said:
Roman numerals, mismatched date wheel, cyclops, fluted bezel all complete non-nos for me. All of course completely irrelevant to those who like it.
It's a bit like complaining that a Rolls Royce has the Spirit of Ecstasy on the bonnet. smile

The Day Date is an iconic watch and those attributes (including the unique strap) are what make it so.

It is clearly a Rolex and for some, that's not a good thing.
I’m not complaining about it, I’m explaining why I don’t like it and thus answering the implied question in the quoted post as to why some might not like it.

Not really a fan of Rollers either come to think of it ...

I’m sure some people wouldn’t like my favourite watch either and that’s totally fine.

AndrewCrown

2,287 posts

115 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
NDA said:
Hang On said:
Not everyone’s cup of tea but it is this one for me. Although a very recent addition, this is my favourite watch by a country mile. I cba selling of the rest of my collection but if I were starting again I think I would be content with this as an ‘only watch’.

My current favourite watch.... I've often thought of buying one in exactly this spec, it's a classic and most definitely a 'one watch' where you could sell everything else.

A lovely thing.
I've been on the Rolex website looking at all the permutations... Definitely one for the future..

mikeveal

4,585 posts

251 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
My favourite watch is the one I've most recently purchased.
smile

XJSJohn

15,966 posts

220 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
Lee540 said:
I wanted an Omega Speedmaster Professional since I first saw one years ago. Finally got one brand new last year and my daily since I took it out of the box.

Of all the watches that I have, I always come back to my speedie too .... had it 20 years and still my absolute favourite!

andy tims

5,583 posts

247 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
benny.c said:


I like that. Interesting to hear that they wear smaller than the dims suggest. Must try one at some point.

Harry Flashman

19,387 posts

243 months

Sunday 16th February 2020
quotequote all
AndrewCrown said:
Hang On said:
Not everyone’s cup of tea but it is this one for me. Although a very recent addition, this is my favourite watch by a country mile. I cba selling of the rest of my collection but if I were starting again I think I would be content with this as an ‘only watch’.

There are Rolex’s and then there are Rolex’s... this is sublime
I completely agree. That is absolutely lovely and I now want one. Never wanted a Rolex before.

NDA

21,640 posts

226 months

Monday 17th February 2020
quotequote all
Hang On said:
I think we have similar preferences in that regard. (Saw that cracking shot of your Sky Dweller). The blue laser cut sunburst dials are quite special. That said, it was a tough choice between the Blue and the Olive Green when I put them side by side.
You made the right choice. smile

The fact I have a Sky Dweller is (sort of) preventing me from buying a Day Date - they are similar... although I prefer yours in many respects.

Watches are disease I tell you!