New addition

Author
Discussion

Garlick

Original Poster:

40,601 posts

241 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
To save wearing my Breitling every day, I bought this yesterday.

So far so good, I wasn't out to buy a watch but it caught my eye, and at only £276 I thought why not?

Lets see how it stands up


Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Probably outlast the Breitling mate wink

Garlick

Original Poster:

40,601 posts

241 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Probably outlast the Breitling mate wink
frown I hope not

Having this new one does mean I can finally send the Breitling off for a service, although I am a little worried that nobody can tell me how much that service will cost until I send it away!

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Garlick said:
I wasn't out to buy a watch but it caught my eye,
hehe

lowdrag

12,920 posts

214 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Asterix said:
Probably outlast the Breitling mate wink
frown I hope not

Having this new one does mean I can finally send the Breitling off for a service, although I am a little worried that nobody can tell me how much that service will cost until I send it away!
Frankly, I've never had any of my Breitling's serviced in 15 years and they all work fine. When I bought them years back they were "a watch for life" and no mention of a service was ever made. Today they suddenly seem to need servicing and I view this as but a means to make money. Similarly, when they aren't being worn, they stay in the drawer, not in a watch winder, and similarly there has never once been a problem when I put them back on. What do others think? Is this just a fashion, a means to exploit us?

Garlick

Original Poster:

40,601 posts

241 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Frankly, I've never had any of my Breitling's serviced in 15 years and they all work fine. When I bought them years back they were "a watch for life" and no mention of a service was ever made. Today they suddenly seem to need servicing and I view this as but a means to make money. Similarly, when they aren't being worn, they stay in the drawer, not in a watch winder, and similarly there has never once been a problem when I put them back on. What do others think? Is this just a fashion, a means to exploit us?
Interesting, could save me a few hundred pounds, i'll see what the general opinion is

TonySim

295 posts

222 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Garlick,

Just had my 1991 Chronomat serviced for the second time. They replaced the crown and push buttons and it cost £340 all in. It did come back in a nice travel case so that eased the blow a bit.

tricky 100

954 posts

243 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Garlick said:
Asterix said:
Probably outlast the Breitling mate wink
frown I hope not

Having this new one does mean I can finally send the Breitling off for a service, although I am a little worried that nobody can tell me how much that service will cost until I send it away!
Frankly, I've never had any of my Breitling's serviced in 15 years and they all work fine. When I bought them years back they were "a watch for life" and no mention of a service was ever made. Today they suddenly seem to need servicing and I view this as but a means to make money. Similarly, when they aren't being worn, they stay in the drawer, not in a watch winder, and similarly there has never once been a problem when I put them back on. What do others think? Is this just a fashion, a means to exploit us?
Yes i agree , just wear it untill it breaks then get it fixed . Everytime ive had the battery replaced in either of my Tags they are always trying to sell me a service and have the seals replaced , surely the seals should last more than a couple of years !

Garlick

Original Poster:

40,601 posts

241 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
TonySim said:
Garlick,

Just had my 1991 Chronomat serviced for the second time. They replaced the crown and push buttons and it cost £340 all in. It did come back in a nice travel case so that eased the blow a bit.
Another Breitling owner I know was charged circa £300, so I guess I need to expect to pay somewhere around that figure too.

The main reason for me keeping the servicing up to date is purely to keep resale value high. I don't plan to sell but you never know, also if I end up handing it down in years to come I want it to have retained as much of it's value as possible. Interesting to hear other views though.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
As far as resale, to me if someone can say "serviced x months ago with reciepts" that would be enough for me. I wouldn't want to see a full service history.

TBH, it depends on the watch and movement. Much of servicing is about checking and replacing seals and waterproofing. Some watch makers will also give the case a good clean removing scuffs or scratches.

If your watch is in good condition and working fine and you don't dive or spend much time with it under water I wouldn't bother.

As usual each to their own etc.

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 28th April 12:59

swanny71

2,862 posts

210 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Not a Brietling but I've had my automatic Seamaster for going on 6 years, worn everyday in ships engine rooms/oil/dirt etc. Its never missed a beat and never been serviced. Only scratches are on the metal strap and they buff out on the bench grinder (using polishing wheel obviously).
It'll get serviced when/if it ever stops.

Seb d

613 posts

198 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
Good choice Paul, I have a Seiko diver for when I don't fancy wearing one of my 50 other watches biggrin