Is this too chavvy?

Is this too chavvy?

Author
Discussion

ATV

Original Poster:

556 posts

197 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
My brother is starting his new graduate's job at an accountancy firm and I wanted to get him a watch as a present.

Trouble is my sister says he likes this http://tinyurl.com/nr5u85

My own view is that it is a bit of a chavvy watch but he might be able to get away with it as he is only 23. What do you guys think?

Don1

15,965 posts

210 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder, and all that...

x200sxy

515 posts

202 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Looks simuilar to a Cartier tank. Possibly a reasonable watch for the money. I quite like it for its looks.

GingerWizard

4,721 posts

200 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
no its fine. Nice watch.

glazbagun

14,300 posts

199 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Looks nice. Not a name that will appeal to watch snobs, but most people dont care so long as it looks good.

Markh

2,781 posts

277 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Why buy a watch with a 'brand' nailed on to it, why not buy one thats from a watch maker eg omega, TAG, etc

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Every Armani watch I've ever seen has ended up looking scruffy as hell after a few months. They're not hardwearing at all.

markomah

652 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
It wouldn't be to my taste but I wouldn't have thought it was chavvy.

BluePurpleRed

1,137 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Markh said:
Why buy a watch with a 'brand' nailed on to it, why not buy one thats from a watch maker eg omega, TAG, etc
Er... £1500? Th eonly problem with these as being primarily a fashion brand they don't stock spares so if you get attached to it ( A friend of mine got one for his 21st) and in 5 years want to get it reconditioned you can't. No new glass available etc. frown

ShadownINja

76,566 posts

284 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Not a single diamond...

W00DY

15,517 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Not my style, but not too chavvy either. Cheaper here though http://www.onlyapony.com/catalogue/men_watches_cat...

funkyol

1,816 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Personally, for that amount of money, i'd get him a nice Seiko - MUCH better quality, movement etc

E.g. the SKX009

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/SEIKO-SCUBA-DIVER-200M-AUTOM...

Much nice IMO

funkyol

1,816 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
What about this?



Edited by CommanderJameson on Thursday 11th June 17:22

jimothy

5,151 posts

239 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Does it matter if it is, as long as he likes it.

TheFlyingBanana

16,484 posts

246 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
For £190 you could get a vintage Omega - much, much classier and recognisable.

NJH

3,021 posts

211 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Very good shout, I have a really nice condition seamaster 30, only worth a couple of hundred quid but it looks classy, no bling and to the non WIS it looks expensive as its an Omega and vintage. I would recommend one above pretty much any other secondhand watch.

okgo

38,356 posts

200 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Lets face it, the lad wants it because it looks good and has Armani on it, and he probably thinks that Armani are the dogs, and they may be in their sector, but I should imagine bar under the label, better quality could be found for half the money. So suggesting a CW is almost pointless in this case IMO

Edited by okgo on Thursday 11th June 20:45

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
okgo said:
Lets face it, the lad wants it because it looks good and has Armani on it, and he probably thinks that Armani are the dogs, and they may be in their sector, but I should imagine bar under the label, better quality could be found for half the money. So suggesting a CW is almost pointless in this case IMO
You're almost certainly right, but you've gotta try.

okgo

38,356 posts

200 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
okgo said:
Lets face it, the lad wants it because it looks good and has Armani on it, and he probably thinks that Armani are the dogs, and they may be in their sector, but I should imagine bar under the label, better quality could be found for half the money. So suggesting a CW is almost pointless in this case IMO
You're almost certainly right, but you've gotta try.
Yes, I saw one of my friends mothers had bought her a Gucci watch, it was expensive, around £1k, I asked her why? They surely had almost no watchmaking history. She insisted that it was a good brand and the best out there.