PH Meet - St Neots - Sunday 14th May

PH Meet - St Neots - Sunday 14th May

Author
Discussion

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
I went to the Eaton Oak but after a steak and 8 pints I forgot my name.

offshoreeddy

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all
A message I've received today from a councillor who's been approached about this is as follows:


Hi XXXX, yes I'm in agreement with you that clause 2 doesn't consider people being branded as anti-social simply for meeting at the car park. I doubt that anyone would be able to get this changed now because of the cost to do so. The wording would have been signed of by HDC Cabinet members without checking with local Councillors.

The meet on Sunday morning has never been a problem as far as I know and neighbours have not complained about this. The complaints all referred to night use of the car park. I'm not sure how friends meeting at the car park on a Sunday morning could be regarded as anti-social under the order and that was not what was intended by HDC.


Reading between the lines, this would appear to almost be an endorsement for us to continue using as before, which is lovely of course. I think we'll just have to make it a strict requirement that you arrive and leave quietly and respectfully, no excessive engine revving etc etc.




Gretchen

19,046 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all
That's encouraging Matt. Hopefully we can continue until otherwise asked not to.

ferrisbueller

29,344 posts

228 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all
offshoreeddy said:
A message I've received today from a councillor who's been approached about this is as follows:


Hi XXXX, yes I'm in agreement with you that clause 2 doesn't consider people being branded as anti-social simply for meeting at the car park. I doubt that anyone would be able to get this changed now because of the cost to do so. The wording would have been signed of by HDC Cabinet members without checking with local Councillors.

The meet on Sunday morning has never been a problem as far as I know and neighbours have not complained about this. The complaints all referred to night use of the car park. I'm not sure how friends meeting at the car park on a Sunday morning could be regarded as anti-social under the order and that was not what was intended by HDC.


Reading between the lines, this would appear to almost be an endorsement for us to continue using as before, which is lovely of course. I think we'll just have to make it a strict requirement that you arrive and leave quietly and respectfully, no excessive engine revving etc etc.
I think 40-50 people rocking up on a Sunday morning might be out of the scope of what he was referring to?

andrew

9,974 posts

193 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
just be very careful of these orders folks

as a result of one, i got followed for nine miles until the police claim that i touched a solid white line whilst straddling some broken road surface

anyway, the result is a ban from the county for a year unless i wish to have my car SEIZED ( their capitals ) and crushed for any similarly heinous future offence

sadly, no obvious means of appeal

AWRacing

1,714 posts

226 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
andrew said:
just be very careful of these orders folks

as a result of one, i got followed for nine miles until the police claim that i touched a solid white line whilst straddling some broken road surface

anyway, the result is a ban from the county for a year unless i wish to have my car SEIZED ( their capitals ) and crushed for any similarly heinous future offence

sadly, no obvious means of appeal
Sounds like there is more to this story then you're letting on...


andrew

9,974 posts

193 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
AWRacing said:
andrew said:
just be very careful of these orders folks

as a result of one, i got followed for nine miles until the police claim that i touched a solid white line whilst straddling some broken road surface

anyway, the result is a ban from the county for a year unless i wish to have my car SEIZED ( their capitals ) and crushed for any similarly heinous future offence

sadly, no obvious means of appeal
Sounds like there is more to this story then you're letting on...
ask away !

ferrisbueller

29,344 posts

228 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
andrew said:
AWRacing said:
andrew said:
just be very careful of these orders folks

as a result of one, i got followed for nine miles until the police claim that i touched a solid white line whilst straddling some broken road surface

anyway, the result is a ban from the county for a year unless i wish to have my car SEIZED ( their capitals ) and crushed for any similarly heinous future offence

sadly, no obvious means of appeal
Sounds like there is more to this story then you're letting on...
ask away !
I'll start: WTF?!

andrew

9,974 posts

193 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
andrew said:
AWRacing said:
andrew said:
just be very careful of these orders folks

as a result of one, i got followed for nine miles until the police claim that i touched a solid white line whilst straddling some broken road surface

anyway, the result is a ban from the county for a year unless i wish to have my car SEIZED ( their capitals ) and crushed for any similarly heinous future offence

sadly, no obvious means of appeal
Sounds like there is more to this story then you're letting on...
ask away !
I'll start: WTF?!
not wishing to ruin your day, but google section 59 and zero tolerance policing

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
Cambs take on it is pretty reasonable if you ask me.

https://www.cambs.police.uk/about/foi/policies/Sei...

it requires the driver to have committed both antisocial behaviour in the vehicle AND driving without due care and attention

They can then only seize the vehicle if the driver has already been warned within the last 12 months.

Their definition of 'occasion' on page 14 makes it pretty obvious that simply meeting up and driving away would not constitute an offence under section 59.


offshoreeddy

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Thursday 1st June 2017
quotequote all
OK, I'm just going to go ahead and post the meet up at the usual venue for the 11th June, and we'll play it by ear.

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Thursday 1st June 2017
quotequote all
offshoreeddy said:
OK, I'm just going to go ahead and post the meet up at the usual venue for the 11th June, and we'll play it by ear.
That's what I would suggest

Evo9lution

637 posts

141 months

Thursday 1st June 2017
quotequote all
They need to apply common sense or else it will become prejudicial against anyone who has / likes nice cars, regardless of how they actually behave.

Hold the event as usual, everyone behave, and let's see if anyone comments. If they do, we can have a composed, adult, reasonable discussion with them.

ciciampi

2 posts

84 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
[quote=offshoreeddy]

Hi Eddy,

appreciate the thoughtful and measured response, don't have any issues with any of your points. Overall I was disappointed with the fact that my event was used to depict the 2am issues experienced by the residents.

Can you please let me know who I should inform as I have agreed to visit the Riverside Car Park on Sunday 23rd July with the Abarth Owners Club - which I would expect to be of a much more sedate nature. We would be arriving at 3.30pm and leaving by 5pm.

I have messenger messaged a local resident who had already been in touch with me, so I hope this can proceed without causing too much turbulence,

Regards

Ciro



offshoreeddy

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Thursday 8th June 2017
quotequote all
I don't think you need to message anyone. There have also been messages of 'support' sent my way from local residents and none of them have mentioned my meet or yours as the problem, just the modified-Corse brigade as the source of problems. Obviously from the video we know there is at least one person who's likely to video the event(s) but I don't think there's a problem with cars turning up, just the noise levels.

gadgit

971 posts

268 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
Personally, my heart tells me I should go somewhere else and leave St Neots on its own.
I don't Like the idea of driving into the car park being looked at or thinking people are not happy seeing me arriving?
So, I don't mind paying £3 and going to Grafham waters as I will be able to relax with you chaps, enjoy a bit longer drive from my home, and my mate lives close to that location which will be great for him.
Sometimes its just better to move on in this world, but that doesn't mean we won't be somewhere even better!

Gadgit.

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
gadgit said:
Personally, my heart tells me I should go somewhere else and leave St Neots on its own.
I don't Like the idea of driving into the car park being looked at or thinking people are not happy seeing me arriving?
So, I don't mind paying £3 and going to Grafham waters as I will be able to relax with you chaps, enjoy a bit longer drive from my home, and my mate lives close to that location which will be great for him.
Sometimes its just better to move on in this world, but that doesn't mean we won't be somewhere even better!

Gadgit.
Some of the local residents spoke to us on Sunday and made a point of saying we are more than welcome. The issue is very much surrounding the local 'Barry boys' at 2 - 4 am, being incredibly loud.

Anecdotally, I believe they have already changed location to the other end of town after a frequent police presence through the nights so I really wouldn't expect it to be an issue in the slightest for future events.

Will_91

21 posts

98 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
I thought this came across very well Matt, and makes it pretty clear that we are not the problem!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0541dl6#play

Play from 1:37:00 onwards.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
Will_91 said:
I thought this came across very well Matt
Agreed. Perfect ambassador.

offshoreeddy

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
Will_91 said:
I thought this came across very well Matt, and makes it pretty clear that we are not the problem!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0541dl6#play

Play from 1:37:00 onwards.
Cheers, yes I thought it was good, have to say I was a little concerned they might edit it to make it sound otherwise, but in the end it was well edited and presented.