USS George H W Bush has arrived in Portsmouth..

USS George H W Bush has arrived in Portsmouth..

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,071 posts

266 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Will the carrier air wings all now be made up of various varieties of F-18?

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
I think they will eventually, there are still some Air Wings using the Prowler.


knight

5,207 posts

280 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I do like the EA-6/A6 family. Went to NAS Whidbey Island many years ago and had a guided tour of the ramp smile

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
I think some were hoping the airwing would be a different one with Prowlers.

There were 3 on deck on the Theodore Roosevelt in 2009 smile


Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
I think there may be a cunning plan [budget] somewhere to hang on to the growlers somehow....

Nobby Diesel

2,055 posts

252 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
I had the pleasure of a tour around the boat on Sunday.
The sheer scale of everything is what impressed me. 5500 people aboard! Around 80 aircraft!
I remarked to my guide, that it was good to know that someone could still launch a fixed wing at sea.
He said that we all "help each other out". " You see, we can't find submarines to save our lives, but you guys are pretty good at it. You shouw us where they are and we'll sort them out"

Barletta

10,532 posts

161 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
They can never find our substhumbup

aeropilot

34,682 posts

228 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Nobby Diesel said:
He said that we all "help each other out". " You see, we can't find submarines to save our lives, but you guys are pretty good at it. You show us where they are and we'll sort them out"
We were pretty good at it before Call Me Dave axed the Nimrod fleet rolleyes




wildcat45

8,076 posts

190 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
We were pretty good at it before Call Me Dave axed the Nimrod fleet rolleyes
Indeed the tt.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
Indeed the tt.
Don't get me started on that one, Cameron simply is clueless.

Also scrapping our Harrier force then promptly going in to war in Libya after slashing the equipment that could be useful in Libya.

The guy is proving to be a liability, and a poor PM. I hope that someone with more of an idea what is happening in the real world takes over from him before he can inflict more damage. I wonder whether Liam Fox would be any better. He did warn of the Nimrod cancellation risks and the concern over increasing overseas aid budgets. It may all be posturing and positioning for a future attempt at a PM role. There is no denying that many were left bemused at the Nimrod scrapping, and
many are angry at increasing aid budgets. Cameron needs to either start listening and thinking, otherwise he and the Tories will be swept away at the next election.





spicjt

192 posts

209 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Any idea on how these would all be paid for?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Well the Nimrod was paid for bar £200 million to complete. It cost at least £200 million to cancel out of the contract with BAe Systems. Not sure if there were any further penalties with other suppliers such as Rolls Royce.

Compared that with the £1 billion that Libya is likely to cost by the end of this year, or the £11 billion+ in aid/bribes we are giving to other countries over the next few years.

Libya is a separate issue for another thread, but I am not sure who thought it would be a good idea (6 months after these cuts) to go in without a clear plan and exit strategy, leaving it in the hope that a bunch of Rebels will sort out Gadaffi, whilst the public were bullcensoreded into believing it was a "no fly zone" and not regime change.

If Cameron could have got his hands on the Carriers he would have axed those aswell, I never thought I'd say this but at least that is one thing to thank "Winky" for, making those contracts so binding. At at least we may one day have a Fleet Air Arm presence. At the moment we are hoping the Americans and French will bail us out.

Meanwhile Cameron is still insistent on the hugely expensive, Nuclear Trident replacement. Is it not going to be a bit of a sitting duck without something like a Nimrod for top cover?




AshVX220

Original Poster:

5,929 posts

191 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Couldn't agree more with the above. Our politicians are very quick to commit our troops to action but far too tight to give them what they need. Scrapping Ark, the Harrier's and the Nimrods's was a complete and utter cock up.

How to pay for what we need? Well, scrap foreign aid to nations with their own nuclear arsenal for a start. Stop throwing money at chavs for popping out countless bd children. But mostly, stop committing this country to military action and expecting the MoD's normal annual budget to be able to cover it. You can't engage in a military conflict of any size without going into a wartime budget.

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all


What's with the police boat... I guess the carrier can't defend itself... Another waste of "limited" police resources....

FourWheelDrift

88,560 posts

285 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
mrloudly said:


What's with the police boat... I guess the carrier can't defend itself... Another waste of "limited" police resources....
If you were in the water fuzz and you could sidle up to it and have a look around I'm sure you would too. They are probably saving money by not burning diesel tearing around the Solent like Miami Vice.

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
If you were in the water fuzz and you could sidle up to it and have a look around I'm sure you would too. They are probably saving money by not burning diesel tearing around the Solent like Miami Vice.
I remember when we were at Shamrock Quay they got loads of stick for dicking around in Southampton water. Tossers pulled my lads for no reason in our RIB. Life jackets, fully trained, boats name on the RIB
TOTAL waste of taxpayers cash!

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
Probably more for protection of sailors who get too close by accident. There was a 250m exclusion zone around the carrier.

A JetSkier got turned around.



The tour boats apparent got warned twice for getting too close on the Saturday. I think the Americans are very touchy, especially with what happened to the USS Cole.

They said initially if you got too close they would launch the water cannons. If you still didn't turn around then they would most likely open fire.

I saw at least 3 people on the stern with rifles/guns.

FourWheelDrift

88,560 posts

285 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It's that special relationship we have.

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So let them put out their launches....

More importantly, were that jet ski laden with Semtex that old tub wouldn't catch/stop it...

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So let them put out their launches....

More importantly, were that jet ski laden with Semtex that old tub wouldn't catch/stop it...


Edited by mrloudly on Wednesday 1st June 21:35