HMS Ocean navigating the Thames barrier

HMS Ocean navigating the Thames barrier

Author
Discussion

chazola

Original Poster:

459 posts

158 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
is it me or was this a bit of a close call- brown trousers and a bking or no-one's fault?
When I used to live near the river I noticed anything being towed went at a fair rate, I guess due to strong currents?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/9245926/...

Stuck In A Lift

2,941 posts

172 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Where is the best place to view this from?

markmullen

15,877 posts

235 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
She's right hand drive, you always get closer on the side you can see easier wink

The rearmost tug did appear to be trying to bring her back to the left.

JAHetfield

443 posts

150 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
That was nearly close!

Simpo Two

85,652 posts

266 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
I wondered why we're using a naval asset for AA cover when it would surely be simpler to use land-based systems. Or haven't we got any of those? Helicopters and marines can work from land, sparing the ship for use elsewhere.

NB Looking at the aerial view I suspect the ship clipped the barrier - hence the cut to a different angle.

Edited by Simpo Two on Friday 4th May 16:41

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I wondered why we're using a naval asset for AA cover when it would surely be simpler to use land-based systems. Or haven't we got any of those? Helicopters and marines can work from land, sparing the ship for use elsewhere.

NB Looking at the aerial view I suspect the ship clipped the barrier - hence the cut to a different angle.

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 4th May 16:41
I imagine it's there more as a statement than anything else.

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I wondered why we're using a naval asset for AA cover when it would surely be simpler to use land-based systems. Or haven't we got any of those? Helicopters and marines can work from land, sparing the ship for use elsewhere.
Edited by Simpo Two on Friday 4th May 16:41
Because it's a lot easier to move the ship into place rather than parking the ship in Portsmouth, taking off all of its helicopters, spares, weapons, fuel, maintenance equipment and crew, trucking it 70 miles to London, finding somewhere to store it all securely and under cover in the middle of the city, and then sending it back again six weeks later? Ocean isn't any use without helicopters and crew.

Dogwatch

6,237 posts

223 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
'Left hand down a bit.......'

BOINNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG


'Oh, lummy!!!!'

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Miles away.

Ross1988

1,234 posts

184 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
They are deploying Rapier batteries to defend the airspace. I'm not too sure that HMS Ocean is there for defence purposes, rather the Navy getting in on the act, as the army is deploying 13,500 troops to help. They have to justify their budget somehow.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
...and the OOW was heard to say, mere seconds before....."Right, hold my beer and watch this......"

LotusOmega375D

7,678 posts

154 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
You could get a bus through there!

Apparently the Navy has also recommissioned the 6" guns on HMS Belfast to keep any potential land-based invaders outside the M25. This combination of MoD and Border Agency immigration policies should ensure that the Olympics takes place without any hitch, or without any pesky foreign spectators for that matter.

Simpo Two

85,652 posts

266 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Because it's a lot easier to move the ship into place rather than parking the ship in Portsmouth, taking off all of its helicopters, spares, weapons, fuel, maintenance equipment and crew, trucking it 70 miles to London, finding somewhere to store it all securely and under cover in the middle of the city, and then sending it back again six weeks later? Ocean isn't any use without helicopters and crew.
Sure. I was being optimistic and assuming we had other AA assets knocking about somewhere in the UK.

Evidently we don't. Let's hope we don't need AA cover when HMS Ocean is on the other side of the world...

Although from Ross says it's more of a testing/show-off thing.

markmullen

15,877 posts

235 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Apparently the Navy has also recommissioned the 6" guns on HMS Belfast to keep any potential land-based invaders outside the M25. This combination of MoD and Border Agency immigration policies should ensure that the Olympics takes place without any hitch, or without any pesky foreign spectators for that matter.
The big boys outside the Imperial War Museum would be amazing to recommission.

Huntsman

8,083 posts

251 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
I'm amazed Ocean has that big rust streak running down from the anchor.

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
You could get a bus through there!

Apparently the Navy has also recommissioned the 6" guns on HMS Belfast to keep any potential land-based invaders outside the M25. This combination of MoD and Border Agency immigration policies should ensure that the Olympics takes place without any hitch, or without any pesky foreign spectators for that matter.
People foreign to London from outside the M25, you mean the English? hehe

Skywalker

3,269 posts

215 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
So, nothing to do with having a full range of medical facilities and the ability to hide hundreds of Booties inside the steel hull then. All this in addition to the flight deck and helis.

It sounds like a sensible plan.

Is the US Navy going to have a CVN or a Gator parked in the Thames estuary too? Well, they always by coincidence have a CVN on a friendship visit whenever POTUS comes to stay.

coanda

2,644 posts

191 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
I think this asset was specifically intended to calm our nearest and dearest allies. We would have had a USMC baby carrier otherwise.

mickrick

3,700 posts

174 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Perfectly manouvered. Loads of room. driving

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
Skywalker said:
So, nothing to do with having a full range of medical facilities......
Granted, she's got a large(ish) sickbay but......"a full range" of facilities? Better and bigger than the main London hospitals?