HMS Queen Elizabeth

Author
Discussion

hidetheelephants

24,511 posts

194 months

Sunday 14th June 2020
quotequote all
Non-nukes are useful for the littoral though, we should never have got out of the game. It's all very well dominating blue water but the whizzbangcrash stuff happens over the beach.

donutsina911

1,049 posts

185 months

Sunday 14th June 2020
quotequote all
Penguinracer said:
While the Carrier definitely has it’s place in projecting power in a lower level asymmetric conflict, when it comes to conflict with an opponent of comparable power & technology, the 4000km hypersonic missile has perhaps rendered the Carrier as vulnerable as the battleships were to air power.

The US Navy & Air Force have developed cost-effective alternatives to nuclear submarines & manned fighters but the entrenched defence contractors are a power lobby on the hill.
What's the cost effective alternative to an SSN?

donutsina911

1,049 posts

185 months

Sunday 14th June 2020
quotequote all
MBBlat said:
The Russians do like to talk up their hypersonic missiles, however they suffer from the same fundamental flaw as all anti-carrier weapons called "first find the carrier".
Gaofen (CN) and Persona etc etc likely to make this an easier job than we'd like.

Evanivitch

20,159 posts

123 months

Sunday 14th June 2020
quotequote all
Penguinracer said:
What's your point?

Is it that China might win a fight if it was on their own doorstep?

Penguinracer

1,593 posts

207 months

Monday 15th June 2020
quotequote all
China's "doorstep" now has a 4000km radius in which any carrier will be highly vulnerable.

While NATO & EU have been strategically quite insular, in the last three decades China has been building significant strategic alliances throughout Africa with its "Infrastructure for Resources" program and throughout the Pacific with its "Aid & Infrastructure for Influence" projects.

Those of us who are either from or live in the Pacific, and this includes the US, are only too well aware of the the importance of Pacific island strongholds as we're seeing a repetition of the '30's.

Too many countries are now armed to fight the last war not the next one.

Many countries really need to review their:

(1) Bio-security;
(2) Border security;
(3) Cyber security;
(4) Energy security;
(5) Food security;
(6) Water security.

Evanivitch

20,159 posts

123 months

Monday 15th June 2020
quotequote all
Penguinracer said:
China's "doorstep" now has a 4000km radius in which any carrier will be highly vulnerable.

.
Do you understand the implications of launching a ballistic missile system?

RizzoTheRat

25,208 posts

193 months

Thursday 18th June 2020
quotequote all
The new comms system has been installed

https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defence/racing-p...

NM62

952 posts

151 months

Saturday 20th June 2020
quotequote all
Active this morning


Cold

15,253 posts

91 months

Wednesday 1st July 2020
quotequote all
She's due home tomorrow (Thursday) morning at 10AM should you wish to liven up your daily seaside walk.

After a few weeks alongside, I think the next voyage and round of training flights will involve aircraft from the USA.

98elise

26,671 posts

162 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
What are the crowds like these days when the carrier's leave or enter harbour?

I've got time on my hands these days so might take a trip down next time one of them moves. I served on Ark Royal so will be interesting to see the size difference.

Cold

15,253 posts

91 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Still popular, but it's no longer ten deep as she pops in and for the training voyages. Definitely worth seeing them in the flesh at least once. The harbour tours haven't re-started yet post covid19, but they can be fun way to get up close(ish) to either/both carriers.

It's always fascinating to watch them squeeze in through the harbour mouth. You can almost touch them as they pass by the Still and West.

Size comparisons to Ark Royal might have you making excuses though biggrin
Illustrious once got the tape measure out...


98elise

26,671 posts

162 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Cold said:
Still popular, but it's no longer ten deep as she pops in and for the training voyages. Definitely worth seeing them in the flesh at least once. The harbour tours haven't re-started yet post covid19, but they can be fun way to get up close(ish) to either/both carriers.

It's always fascinating to watch them squeeze in through the harbour mouth. You can almost touch them as they pass by the Still and West.

Size comparisons to Ark Royal might have you making excuses though biggrin
Illustrious once got the tape measure out...

Funny thing is I've never seen Ark Royal under sail from an observer point of view, so it will be difficult for me to compare. My wife has though so will definitely have the excuses ready smile

Looks like a big bugger in videos.

acd80

745 posts

146 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
98elise said:
What are the crowds like these days when the carrier's leave or enter harbour?

I've got time on my hands these days so might take a trip down next time one of them moves. I served on Ark Royal so will be interesting to see the size difference.
Old ships! I've got this mounted in my home office.



MBBlat

1,640 posts

150 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
98elise said:
Funny thing is I've never seen Ark Royal under sail from an observer point of view, so it will be difficult for me to compare. My wife has though so will definitely have the excuses ready smile

Looks like a big bugger in videos.
You could fit the entire Ark Royal flightdeck into the hangar of Queen Elizabeth.
That might give you a clue as to the size difference smile

98elise

26,671 posts

162 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
acd80 said:
98elise said:
What are the crowds like these days when the carrier's leave or enter harbour?

I've got time on my hands these days so might take a trip down next time one of them moves. I served on Ark Royal so will be interesting to see the size difference.
Old ships! I've got this mounted in my home office.


Nice one! I'm assuming you were on it at decommissioning? I was on it in the late 80's.

acd80

745 posts

146 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
98elise said:
Nice one! I'm assuming you were on it at decommissioning? I was on it in the late 80's.
Yes - I left it in early 2011. It was a very strange time. Due to the role I did, there wasn't much to do alongside other than Divisional Officer stuff and it turns out de-kitting an aircraft carrier is a long drawn out process. Jerry Kidd was the old man onboard and I don't know anyone who has a bad thing to say about him. Easily the best skipper I've ever had.

Being 2OOD and subsequently OOD onboard was a mind-numbing chore but my oppo and I did 4 days about during leave periods - SLIB!

One of my favourite drafts if I'm perfectly honest - I'm still in now, albeit as a reservist in a niche role, and when I've been cutting around the dockyard, I've seen up close the size difference between Big Lizzie and ARKR. She's a big old unit and HUGELY impressive in the flesh.

I'm glad I'm not an OOD on the new class - going from HQ1 to HQ2 via the bridge at the rush wouldn't be my idea of fun...

mattyn1

5,780 posts

156 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
acd80 said:
Yes - I left it in early 2011. It was a very strange time. Due to the role I did, there wasn't much to do alongside other than Divisional Officer stuff and it turns out de-kitting an aircraft carrier is a long drawn out process. Jerry Kidd was the old man onboard and I don't know anyone who has a bad thing to say about him. Easily the best skipper I've ever had.

Being 2OOD and subsequently OOD onboard was a mind-numbing chore but my oppo and I did 4 days about during leave periods - SLIB!

One of my favourite drafts if I'm perfectly honest - I'm still in now, albeit as a reservist in a niche role, and when I've been cutting around the dockyard, I've seen up close the size difference between Big Lizzie and ARKR. She's a big old unit and HUGELY impressive in the flesh.

I'm glad I'm not an OOD on the new class - going from HQ1 to HQ2 via the bridge at the rush wouldn't be my idea of fun...
How niche?

acd80

745 posts

146 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
mattyn1 said:
How niche?
I'm one of only two in my rate in the entire service.

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
acd80 said:
Yes - I left it in early 2011. It was a very strange time. Due to the role I did, there wasn't much to do alongside other than Divisional Officer stuff and it turns out de-kitting an aircraft carrier is a long drawn out process. Jerry Kidd was the old man onboard and I don't know anyone who has a bad thing to say about him. Easily the best skipper I've ever had.

Being 2OOD and subsequently OOD onboard was a mind-numbing chore but my oppo and I did 4 days about during leave periods - SLIB!

One of my favourite drafts if I'm perfectly honest - I'm still in now, albeit as a reservist in a niche role, and when I've been cutting around the dockyard, I've seen up close the size difference between Big Lizzie and ARKR. She's a big old unit and HUGELY impressive in the flesh.

I'm glad I'm not an OOD on the new class - going from HQ1 to HQ2 via the bridge at the rush wouldn't be my idea of fun...
confused