FHC Me262 Jumo first test running

FHC Me262 Jumo first test running

Author
Discussion

aeropilot

Original Poster:

34,680 posts

228 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
FHC have just posted on their Facebook page a short video of the first fire up of one of their rebuilt Jumo's for their Me262, The first time a real Jumo has been run since the late 1940's....... thumbup

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1015284137984...


Eric Mc

122,058 posts

266 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Sounds a bit rough. I hope they have improved the reliability.

aeropilot

Original Poster:

34,680 posts

228 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sounds a bit rough. I hope they have improved the reliability.
Yeah, they've upped the TBO from 25 hours to 26 hrs laugh


Simpo Two

85,553 posts

266 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Sounds like a diesel... I certainly wouldn't want to fly anything powered by it.

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Impressive feat

FourWheelDrift

88,557 posts

285 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Running? It appears to be on fire, which is probably what most of them did in period.

2013BRM

39,731 posts

285 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Sounds fine to me, having done many an engine run on much more powerful stuff. The mic sounds like it's picking up most of the roar from the tailpipe, it seems to be running on tickover with the remains of a wet start burning off......or maybe excessive fuelling at start is a characteristic of the Jumo, so it will sound a bit 'rumbly'

aeropilot

Original Poster:

34,680 posts

228 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
2013BRM said:
Sounds fine to me, having done many an engine run on much more powerful stuff. The mic sounds like it's picking up most of the roar from the tailpipe, it seems to be running on tickover with the remains of a wet start burning off......or maybe excessive fuelling at start is a characteristic of the Jumo, so it will sound a bit 'rumbly'
Yup, wet starts are a Jumo characteristic IIRC, there's certainly in-period film of them wet starting.

Benni

3,517 posts

212 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Scrolling down on the answers to that Video,

I found that clip of a 109 and ME 262 doing an airshow at Manching, the german military R&D site.

What 262 could that have been ? I thought they were extinct but am no expert.

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
Benni said:
Scrolling down on the answers to that Video,

I found that clip of a 109 and ME 262 doing an airshow at Manching, the german military R&D site.

What 262 could that have been ? I thought they were extinct but am no expert.
There are some reproduction 262s fitted with modern engines.

aeropilot

Original Poster:

34,680 posts

228 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Benni said:
Scrolling down on the answers to that Video,

I found that clip of a 109 and ME 262 doing an airshow at Manching, the german military R&D site.

What 262 could that have been ? I thought they were extinct but am no expert.
There are some reproduction 262s fitted with modern engines.
Yup, handful of 'continuation' airframes built but with modern engines.

See here for the background and history behind these 'new' a/c.

http://www.stormbirds.com/project/index.html

Benni

3,517 posts

212 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for the answers.

AER

1,142 posts

271 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
The reproductions run modern engines, but re-cased in something that bears close resemblance to the original Jumo, apparently. It was done as a means of minimising the rework of the airframe design and also to make the modern engine match the weight of the original Jumo. (i.e. much heavier...)