Tornado To Be Axed

Author
Discussion

Tony1963

4,796 posts

163 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
I'm not going to answer such a stupid question. Google the terms involved, then make your own mind up.

budgie smuggler

5,397 posts

160 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
I'm not going to answer such a stupid question. Google the terms involved, then make your own mind up.
Do enlighten us.

Eric Mc

122,095 posts

266 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Eric Mc said:
Hmmm - you could just as well claim that a bullet from a machine gun was "fully autonomous" once it leaves the barrel.
Sometimes, if you whistle loud enough, they'll come back... yes
A bit like a sheep dog.

AndrewEH1

4,917 posts

154 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
yellowjack said:
Eric Mc said:
Hmmm - you could just as well claim that a bullet from a machine gun was "fully autonomous" once it leaves the barrel.
Sometimes, if you whistle loud enough, they'll come back... yes
A bit like a sheep dog.
Just don't mix the two up!


maffski

1,868 posts

160 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
I'm not going to answer such a stupid question. Google the terms involved, then make your own mind up.
Because it can't land or be reused?

- Hurricat

Because it can't take off?

- Goblin

Because it's intended to hit a target and explode?

- Wisteria Blossom

The difference between missile and aircraft only ready exists because of the value we place on human life (the ones on our side anyway). For example, is this an aircraft or a missile?



Tony1963

4,796 posts

163 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
There are people in psychiatric hospitals with that sort of logic.

budgie smuggler

5,397 posts

160 months

Monday 9th April 2018
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
There are people in psychiatric hospitals with that sort of logic.
Let's hear your logic then.

IanH755

1,865 posts

121 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
maffski said:


This fully autonomous aircraft does not loiter, and has been going toe-to-toe (wingtip-to-wingtip?) with fighter aircraft for 60 years.
With respect to UAV's/Drones the term "Fully Autonomous" is very specific and is defined as -

A Level 10 device (equivalent to a human) that is -

a: Cognizant of all entities within the battlespace
b: Able to co-ordinate with others as necessary
c: Capable of total independence from other units
d: Requiring little guidance to do it's assigned job

The AIM-9 only uses the last two functions on that list so it is not a Level 10 fully autonomous device, however as a missile doesn't fit into the traditional "UAV" definition it is difficult to pin down exactly where it would fit but the closest would be around a Level 4-5 area according the USAF Research Lab ( the PDF of their report - chart on the last page) so it it has some "autonomy" it doesn't match the very specific requirements in your post.

Hope that helps.

  • edited for easier reading.
Edited by IanH755 on Tuesday 10th April 19:17

budgie smuggler

5,397 posts

160 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
With respect to UAV's/Drones the term "Fully Autonomous" is very specific and is defined as a Level 10 device(equivalent to a human) that is cognizant of all within battlespace & co-ordinates as necessary, which is capable of total independence and requires little guidance to do it's assigned job.

The AIM-9 only uses the last two functions on that list so it is not a Level 10 fully autonomous device, however as a missile doesn't fit into the traditional "UAV" definition it is difficult to pin down exactly where it would fit but the closest would be around a Level 4-5 area according the USAF Research Lab ( the PDF of their report - chart on the last page) so it it has some "autonomy" it doesn't match the very specific requirements in your post.

Hope that helps.
clap thank you.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
I was once told that the term 'drone' is a reference to the 'Queen Bee' remotely piloted aircraft of WW2. In which case an autonomous aircraft is not by definition a drone.

Yertis

18,069 posts

267 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
I was once told that the term 'drone' is a reference to the 'Queen Bee' remotely piloted aircraft of WW2.
Well that makes no sense because a queen is not a drone. Although a drone is needed to fertilise the queen. Can't quite see where the term 'drone' originated with ref pilotless aircraft, unless it references their inability to operate independently (drones being tied to the hive). Or maybe it's the noise they make.


eharding

13,750 posts

285 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Dr Jekyll said:
I was once told that the term 'drone' is a reference to the 'Queen Bee' remotely piloted aircraft of WW2.
Well that makes no sense because a queen is not a drone. Although a drone is needed to fertilise the queen. Can't quite see where the term 'drone' originated with ref pilotless aircraft, unless it references their inability to operate independently (drones being tied to the hive). Or maybe it's the noise they make.
Even more confusing that the Queen Bee was in fact a Moth.....or two Moths, mashed together. But not really a Bee.

Yet more confusingly, Moths aren't autonomous. They act like they are, until they see a candle, and then they make a bee-line straight for it - can't help themselves. Drawn irresistibly to their doom by the beguiling infra-red allure of the flame.

Much like a Sidewinder missile, in fact. Although you don't tend to get so many of them coming in though open windows on summer nights.

Anyway, where were we?

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
eharding said:
Yet more confusingly, Moths aren't autonomous. They act like they are, until they see a candle, and then they make a bee-line straight for it - can't help themselves. Drawn irresistibly to their doom by the beguiling infra-red allure of the flame.

Much like a Sidewinder missile, in fact. Although you don't tend to get so many of them coming in though open windows on summer nights.
There is a theory that they keep bright light on a certain bearing because if the light is the moon this prevents them going round in circles, this would explain why they spiral closer to the flame without heading directly towards it. This is exactly the same principle as a sidewinder of course. It doesn't turn to head directly for the target but keeps it on a constant bearing which often means it will aim ahead of the target. Constant bearing decreasing range means you hit it sooner or later.

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

185 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
This is exactly the same principle as a sidewinder of course. It doesn't turn to head directly for the target but keeps it on a constant bearing which often means it will aim ahead of the target. Constant bearing decreasing range means you hit it sooner or later.
Depends upon which variant of the 'winder you are talking about.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Dr Jekyll said:
This is exactly the same principle as a sidewinder of course. It doesn't turn to head directly for the target but keeps it on a constant bearing which often means it will aim ahead of the target. Constant bearing decreasing range means you hit it sooner or later.
Depends upon which variant of the 'winder you are talking about.
I was afraid it might
paperbag


Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Tuesday 10th April 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Dr Jekyll said:
This is exactly the same principle as a sidewinder of course. It doesn't turn to head directly for the target but keeps it on a constant bearing which often means it will aim ahead of the target. Constant bearing decreasing range means you hit it sooner or later.
Depends upon which variant of the 'winder you are talking about.
I was afraid it might
paperbag
I guess the early variant which earned it the name smile

Tony1963

4,796 posts

163 months

Wednesday 11th April 2018
quotequote all
A GR4 from Marham arrived at Duxford today. No idea when it'll be on show.

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

163 months

Wednesday 11th April 2018
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
A GR4 from Marham arrived at Duxford today. No idea when it'll be on show.


It sounds like it already is:

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/nationa...

Tony1963

4,796 posts

163 months

Wednesday 11th April 2018
quotequote all
Boatbuoy said:
"Tornadoes"....... grrrrrrrrr.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

76 months

Thursday 12th April 2018
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
With respect to UAV's/Drones the term "Fully Autonomous" is very specific and is defined as -

A Level 10 device (equivalent to a human) that is -

a: Cognizant of all entities within the battlespace
b: Able to co-ordinate with others as necessary
c: Capable of total independence from other units
d: Requiring little guidance to do it's assigned job

The AIM-9 only uses the last two functions on that list so it is not a Level 10 fully autonomous device, however as a missile doesn't fit into the traditional "UAV" definition it is difficult to pin down exactly where it would fit but the closest would be around a Level 4-5 area according the USAF Research Lab ( the PDF of their report - chart on the last page) so it it has some "autonomy" it doesn't match the very specific requirements in your post.

Hope that helps.

  • edited for easier reading.
Edited by IanH755 on Tuesday 10th April 19:17
Actually it will do item a. as well.

Which can be a problem.

As for bellend comment rolleyes Has "she who shall not be trifled with" byebye got a new user name?