Norwegian Frigate in a collision

Norwegian Frigate in a collision

Author
Discussion

Dogwatch

6,230 posts

223 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
phumy said:
Too late it had already totally flooded and sunk, maybe they left it open so the water drained out as the tide dropped.
yes

Popeyed

543 posts

220 months

Sunday 18th November 2018
quotequote all
The extent of the damage along the side of the warship gives the impression it was underway and making way at the time of the collision. If this is the case the warship appears to be the give way vessel in a crossing situation in accordance with rule 15 of the collision regulations. Although collisions between ships on the high seas never have strict liability, in this case, if my theorising is correct, the frigate would bear a considerable portion of the liability split.

Ships use AIS as one of many tools in relation to collision avoidance, however, radar is a principal tool, coupled with the mark one eyeball (and ear for listening for sound signals). Too many collisions occur because watchkeepers fail to lookout the window, or look abaft the beam, or know the collision regulations etc. (I could go on and on about this particular topic)!!

MartG

20,694 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th November 2018
quotequote all
Given the tanker still had a tug in attendance, and is somewhat less maneuverable than a frigate, you do have to wonder what the frigate was doing at the time of the collision


aeropilot

34,675 posts

228 months

Sunday 18th November 2018
quotequote all
Popeyed said:
The extent of the damage along the side of the warship gives the impression it was underway and making way at the time of the collision. If this is the case the warship appears to be the give way vessel in a crossing situation in accordance with rule 15 of the collision regulations. Although collisions between ships on the high seas never have strict liability, in this case, if my theorising is correct, the frigate would bear a considerable portion of the liability split.

Ships use AIS as one of many tools in relation to collision avoidance, however, radar is a principal tool, coupled with the mark one eyeball (and ear for listening for sound signals).
Rumour has it the Norwegian warship had its AIS turned off.

MartG

20,694 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th November 2018
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Popeyed said:
The extent of the damage along the side of the warship gives the impression it was underway and making way at the time of the collision. If this is the case the warship appears to be the give way vessel in a crossing situation in accordance with rule 15 of the collision regulations. Although collisions between ships on the high seas never have strict liability, in this case, if my theorising is correct, the frigate would bear a considerable portion of the liability split.

Ships use AIS as one of many tools in relation to collision avoidance, however, radar is a principal tool, coupled with the mark one eyeball (and ear for listening for sound signals).
Rumour has it the Norwegian warship had its AIS turned off.
Yes - it only shows up on the AIS trace after the collision ( see here https://gcaptain.com/video-ais-animation-shows-col... )

andy97

4,703 posts

223 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
An interesting description of the incident here

https://verdigris.blog/2018/11/17/the-helge-ingsta...

Condi

17,232 posts

172 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
The transcript is interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYqGxbKF0AI&fe...

Seems like they didnt know each other were there until shortly before the collision, and then afterwards there was confusion with the warship saying it had hit an unknown object, before beaching quite quickly.

HarryW

Original Poster:

15,151 posts

270 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
andy97 said:
An interesting description of the incident here

https://verdigris.blog/2018/11/17/the-helge-ingsta...
Very interesting, informative, well written and a good read to boot.

hidetheelephants

24,472 posts

194 months

Wednesday 21st November 2018
quotequote all
Comedy watchkeeping skillz; did the OOW get their ticket by sending away coupons from cereal packets? Complacency, lack of situational awareness and basic COLREGs failure all round. I suspect that's a constructive loss, once the cost of all new electric string and replacing every electric and electronic device is totted up they might as well buy a new one.

MartG

20,694 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd November 2018
quotequote all


rofl

aeropilot

34,675 posts

228 months

Thursday 22nd November 2018
quotequote all
biglaugh

Smiljan

10,880 posts

198 months

Thursday 22nd November 2018
quotequote all
rofl

Huntsman

8,069 posts

251 months

Tuesday 27th November 2018
quotequote all
Seems they now have a crane onsite.

HarryW

Original Poster:

15,151 posts

270 months

Friday 30th November 2018
quotequote all
Preliminary report and 2 recommendations published yesterday https://www.aibn.no/Marine/Investigations/18-968

Steve_D

13,749 posts

259 months

Friday 30th November 2018
quotequote all
Interesting reading.
So the accident itself was a giant cockup.

The final sinking would seem to be a design failing meaning that more than one of the 'sealed compartments' were not actually sealed despite the hatches being closed. water escaped through shaft tunnel and other breaches in bulkheads. Not good.

Steve

HarryW

Original Poster:

15,151 posts

270 months

Friday 30th November 2018
quotequote all
Steve_D said:
Interesting reading.
So the accident itself was a giant cockup.

The final sinking would seem to be a design failing meaning that more than one of the 'sealed compartments' were not actually sealed despite the hatches being closed. water escaped through shaft tunnel and other breaches in bulkheads. Not good.

Steve
That's how I read it, I think Navantia have some serious questions to answer...

phumy

5,674 posts

238 months

Sunday 2nd December 2018
quotequote all
A bit more in this link:

https://gcaptain.com/norway-releases-preliminary-r...

Poor watchkeeping on the Frigate.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Sunday 2nd December 2018
quotequote all
OTOH, it could be seen as a blessing in disguise that these problems have come to light now rather than when it was actually needed.

Huntsman

8,069 posts

251 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all

Piginapoke

4,769 posts

186 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
Being raised to scrap it?