Royal Navy "lost" a Merlin for a week...

Royal Navy "lost" a Merlin for a week...

Author
Discussion

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...

davebem

746 posts

178 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
At least one Chinook took an RPG in Helmand.
And carried on.
Another lost an undercarriage leg to a land mine.
Ditto.

  1. merlinsarecrap
There was the chuck norris of helicopters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_November

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
IforB said:
but in peacetime and in a safe location
pfft, the locals around Corfe are pretty raw you know..... :-)

100SRV

2,135 posts

243 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
smile
Chinook needs both rotors for lift, pitch and yaw control, they aren't there for redundancy.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...
confused

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
davebem said:
Crossflow Kid said:
At least one Chinook took an RPG in Helmand.
And carried on.
Another lost an undercarriage leg to a land mine.
Ditto.

  1. merlinsarecrap
There was the chuck norris of helicopters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_November
Was?

Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...
Is that through a different pylon to the aft pylon mentioned in the post you quoted?

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
CAPP0 said:
Where's the bit where they "lost" it?
OK. I'll admit it was kinda a "click-bait" title. So they didn't actually misplace the helicopter, but technically they lost the use of it for a week and some poor saps had to live in a tent in a muddy field for a week, guarding it and fixing it. I posted it up because I hadn't seen mention of it on PH, nor in the national press, yet it appeared (to me) to be an "of interest" story to PHers who are into aviation matters.

Maybe I should PM you in future to run thread titles by you for approval?
OP, do you read the Daily Mail by any chance?

Tony1963

4,788 posts

163 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
100SRV said:
Chinook needs both rotors for lift, pitch and yaw control, they aren't there for redundancy.
Just so you know, I've been working on helicopters for the last ten years, and fixed wing for 28 years before that. So my smiley was in acknowledgement of a witty comment.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...
Is that through a different pylon to the aft pylon mentioned in the post you quoted?
No. The (aft) pylon is the only one and is, essentially, the big tail fin bit that the aft rotor head sits on top of.

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Europa1 said:
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...
Is that through a different pylon to the aft pylon mentioned in the post you quoted?
No. The (aft) pylon is the only one and is, essentially, the big tail fin bit that the aft rotor head sits on top of.
Want to check the article again?


eharding

13,740 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
100SRV said:
Chinook needs both rotors for lift, pitch and yaw control, they aren't there for redundancy.
Just so you know, I've been working on helicopters for the last ten years, and fixed wing for 28 years before that. So my smiley was in acknowledgement of a witty comment.
hehe Where is that twin contrarotating whoosh parrot when you need one....or two....

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
Europa1 said:
ecsrobin said:
Crossflow Kid said:
I was thinking more of the one that went through the aft pylon, missing the aft vertical drive shaft by an inch.
It went through the pylon as well. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/79311...
Is that through a different pylon to the aft pylon mentioned in the post you quoted?
No. The (aft) pylon is the only one and is, essentially, the big tail fin bit that the aft rotor head sits on top of.
Want to check the article again?

No. No I don’t. I stated the round went through the aft pylon, you then replied “It went through the pylon as well”.
Not entirely sure what you’re getting at.

MB140

4,077 posts

104 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
For people asking about armour. It’s amazing how heavy it is and how sensitive helicopters are to weight/heat/altitude. All problems in Afghan.

I worked C130J hercs and the armour we fitted in to the flight deck weighed a tonne. Even small panels about 0.5mx0.75m by 25mm thick were nearly a two man lift and move in to place. And there was probably 12-15 fitted.

yellowjack

Original Poster:

17,080 posts

167 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2019
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
yellowjack said:
CAPP0 said:
Where's the bit where they "lost" it?
OK. I'll admit it was kinda a "click-bait" title. So they didn't actually misplace the helicopter, but technically they lost the use of it for a week and some poor saps had to live in a tent in a muddy field for a week, guarding it and fixing it. I posted it up because I hadn't seen mention of it on PH, nor in the national press, yet it appeared (to me) to be an "of interest" story to PHers who are into aviation matters.

Maybe I should PM you in future to run thread titles by you for approval?
OP, do you read the Daily Mail by any chance?
On Saturdays, yes. It has by far the best TV listings magazine and I enjoy the puzzles section. Does this mean you will not take any more long, hot, soapy showers with me?... cry

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
No. No I don’t. I stated the round went through the aft pylon, you then replied “It went through the pylon as well”.
Not entirely sure what you’re getting at.
So going back to my original post I said the RPG round incident the blade was now the squadron bar. You implied it was a different incident. I have linked to an incident where the round went through the blade and the AFT pylon.

I’m assuming you were trying to be pedantic by the fact I didn’t use the term AFT as Europa1 has also questioned it.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
Whatevs.

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Whatevs.
So I’m guessing that’s a yes rofl

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
MB140 said:
For people asking about armour. It’s amazing how heavy it is and how sensitive helicopters are to weight/heat/altitude. All problems in Afghan.

I worked C130J hercs and the armour we fitted in to the flight deck weighed a tonne. Even small panels about 0.5mx0.75m by 25mm thick were nearly a two man lift and move in to place. And there was probably 12-15 fitted.
I worked on 'J's but mostly 'K's' and when we fitted the full armour kit (the new stuff with Velcro not the old bolt in one) we were told that on the stretched aircraft the front plug of the cargo bay was unusable due to all the weight at the front end affecting the balance of the aircraft.
This stuff was only designed to take a .762 type of round. I asked one of the armour reps what would it take to stop a .50cal round he just said double it all! So 2" thick, and 2 tons in weight and the aircraft pretty much useless!

MB140

4,077 posts

104 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
eccles said:
MB140 said:
For people asking about armour. It’s amazing how heavy it is and how sensitive helicopters are to weight/heat/altitude. All problems in Afghan.

I worked C130J hercs and the armour we fitted in to the flight deck weighed a tonne. Even small panels about 0.5mx0.75m by 25mm thick were nearly a two man lift and move in to place. And there was probably 12-15 fitted.
I worked on 'J's but mostly 'K's' and when we fitted the full armour kit (the new stuff with Velcro not the old bolt in one) we were told that on the stretched aircraft the front plug of the cargo bay was unusable due to all the weight at the front end affecting the balance of the aircraft.
This stuff was only designed to take a .762 type of round. I asked one of the armour reps what would it take to stop a .50cal round he just said double it all! So 2" thick, and 2 tons in weight and the aircraft pretty much useless!
Yeah I only fitted the Velcro stuff, k model was literally in its last 6 months when I started on hercs so never did the herc k Q AV course.

Yeah I imagine all that extra weight would severely limit the aircraft envelope du to so much weight out front.

I remember the first time I did a BLOS fit (about 2kg in the dogs kennel) and had to do a weight and balance calaculation because the sm mandated it. Really 1 kg. I bet bigger sts were taken in the loo by some of the para guys on there first jump.