Does anyone know anything about this plane?
Discussion
This is my grandfathers plane. He may have built it himself as he was an engineer working at Shorts during the war. He flew it out of various small fields in Kent. The prop, which I still have, was dated September 1924, when he would have been 23.
I am trying to find any information I can on the plane so if anyone has any info or can suggest anywhere I can ask I would be very grateful
Thanks
I am trying to find any information I can on the plane so if anyone has any info or can suggest anywhere I can ask I would be very grateful
Thanks
It looks extremely small and you say he flew in Kent. It may be worth doing some digging on flying that went on at Lympne during the 1920s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lympne_light_aircraf...
Astacus said:
No Nothing under the wings. Too much shadow.
That's a pity because pre-World War 2, civil registration letters had to cover the entire wing span. This was an era before most aircraft were fitted with radio so visual identification of an aeroplane was essential. It was also great for plane spotters Astacus said:
Could it be something like NATT? The problem is aircraft registrations for there period should be G-E*** or G-A*** post 1929
The prop is 1924 so the photo could be pre-1929.I guessed G-NATT, which is currently here: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/g-natt
However it's an odd place to put the reg number so perhaps it's to do with the engine.
The aeroplane might be a one-off.
Simpo Two said:
The prop is 1924 so the photo could be pre-1929.
I guessed G-NATT, which is currently here: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/g-natt
There would have been no British regsitrations starting with "G-N..." back then. Registrations were issued pretty much in strict alphabetic order.I guessed G-NATT, which is currently here: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/g-natt
Steve_D said:
Have you taken the photo out of the frame to see if anything is written on the back? A very common practice back in the day.
Steve
Yes, Its very firmly stuck to a mount board. I was told years ago the the photo came from Flight Magazine, but I don't think this is true. Flight is completely digitised and I have run searches with no luck.Steve
DavieBNL said:
It looks extremely small and you say he flew in Kent. It may be worth doing some digging on flying that went on at Lympne during the 1920s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lympne_light_aircraf...
Fascinating Wiki, thanks might be worth a look. Interesting that some of the planes listed had v twins or used motorcycle engines! Edited by Astacus on Thursday 16th April 19:03
Simpo Two said:
The prop is 1924 so the photo could be pre-1929.
I guessed G-NATT, which is currently here: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/g-natt
However it's an odd place to put the reg number so perhaps it's to do with the engine.
The aeroplane might be a one-off.
Family legend is that he built it himself using tea crates, but this is probably another dead end. There are many Many family legends about my Grandfather and most of them seem to have been made up by my Grandmother. I guessed G-NATT, which is currently here: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/g-natt
However it's an odd place to put the reg number so perhaps it's to do with the engine.
The aeroplane might be a one-off.
The Shuttleworth Collection at Old Warden in Bedfordshire have both originals and replicas of a number of aircraft that took part in the 1923 and 1924 Lympne Light Aeroplane Trials. If you post your picture on their Facebook page, someone should be able to help.
The only inverted V-Twin engine to which I can find a reference is the Blackburne Tomtit, and that doesn't have those distinctive chrome discs on the valve rocker shafts.
There is always a possibility that it was assembled from bits from other aircraft, as a lot of this went on. Some aircraft appeared both as monoplanes and biplanes, or first high wing , then low wing.
The only inverted V-Twin engine to which I can find a reference is the Blackburne Tomtit, and that doesn't have those distinctive chrome discs on the valve rocker shafts.
There is always a possibility that it was assembled from bits from other aircraft, as a lot of this went on. Some aircraft appeared both as monoplanes and biplanes, or first high wing , then low wing.
Thanks , yes I had just alighted on the B&B Tomtit engine.
there are some tempting similarities, but as you say the shiny discs over the rockers are absent. The crank case and the exhausts are similar. It's tempting to imagine you can see the crank case bolts to the side and the central bolt. Maybe it had some sort of modified cylinder head.
there are some tempting similarities, but as you say the shiny discs over the rockers are absent. The crank case and the exhausts are similar. It's tempting to imagine you can see the crank case bolts to the side and the central bolt. Maybe it had some sort of modified cylinder head.
Edited by Astacus on Thursday 16th April 19:26
Eric Mc said:
Anything letters visible under the wings? Up to 1930, British heavier than air aircraft carried registrations in the block G-Exxx For example, G-ECAN was/is a de Havilland DH84 Dragon (it still exists).
The system was revamped in 1930 and started again with G-AAAA.
Although that Dragon was built during WW2 so not a good example.The system was revamped in 1930 and started again with G-AAAA.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff