Hawker Typhoon rebuild

Author
Discussion

swampy442

1,479 posts

212 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Ooooh Centaurus power.

Yertis

18,060 posts

267 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Normally first flights are quite short, so its a testament to RG's team that it was flown straight to Duxford as part of its flight.

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Great to see. It's noticeably bigger than the Sea Fury.

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Great to see. It's noticeably bigger than the Sea Fury.
Sea Fury has a 3ft shorter wingspan, and sits a little higher up, otherwise they are pretty much same size, with exactly same fuselage length etc.

xeny

4,311 posts

79 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Mustang as a chase plane is rather cool - suppose it gives you something with similar handling and speed range?

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
xeny said:
Yertis said:
Mustang as a chase plane is rather cool - suppose it gives you something with similar handling and speed range?
Also with the bubble canopy, an unobstructed view, should the chase plane need to have got in close or underneath the Tempest to visibly look for any issues etc. The rear jump seat of the Mustang was occupied by one of the senior Engineers responsible for the rebuild, who was in comms with the Tempest pilot, just in case.

Mark V GTD

2,231 posts

125 months

Wednesday 11th October 2023
quotequote all
Aero pilot - you are very well informed! :-)

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Eric Mc said:
Great to see. It's noticeably bigger than the Sea Fury.
Sea Fury has a 3ft shorter wingspan, and sits a little higher up, otherwise they are pretty much same size, with exactly same fuselage length etc.
They took out almost all the entire centre section of the wing for the Sea Fury. And as you said, they mounted the pilots seating position higher to improve visibility for carrier operations. The Sea Fury was a better performer overall.

swampy442

1,479 posts

212 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
What a wonderful sound. I hope theve found a way to make the Centaurus reliable, be a shame if they all eventually get replaced with American radials

GliderRider

2,113 posts

82 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
swampy442 said:
What a wonderful sound. I hope theve found a way to make the Centaurus reliable, be a shame if they all eventually get replaced with American radials
As I understood it, one of the lubricants required for the Centaurus had been out of production for years. Was a fresh batch made or was an alternative found?

Maybe I'm getting muddled up with the Napier Sabre in the Tempest Mk V?

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
swampy442 said:
What a wonderful sound. I hope theve found a way to make the Centaurus reliable
Only way for that to happen is to pay Shell to make about 1000m3 of the correct oil, and that ship sailed off into the sunset about 30+ years ago.


Yertis

18,060 posts

267 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
They took out almost all the entire centre section of the wing for the Sea Fury. And as you said, they mounted the pilots seating position higher to improve visibility for carrier operations. The Sea Fury was a better performer overall.
I was interested to read that the Sabre-engined aircraft was preferred because pilots enjoyed a better view over the (narrower) nose, and handled more crisply, than the Centurus-engined machine.

lufbramatt

5,346 posts

135 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
aeropilot said:
Eric Mc said:
Great to see. It's noticeably bigger than the Sea Fury.
Sea Fury has a 3ft shorter wingspan, and sits a little higher up, otherwise they are pretty much same size, with exactly same fuselage length etc.
They took out almost all the entire centre section of the wing for the Sea Fury. And as you said, they mounted the pilots seating position higher to improve visibility for carrier operations. The Sea Fury was a better performer overall.
The Tempest still used a tubular framework with removable panels for the front half of the fuselage, only the tail was a monocoque like the Typhoon. The Fury/Sea Fury was a much more modern design and the whole fuselage was a stressed skin monocoque structure. So although they look a bit similar they are very different aircraft.

I remember reading somewhere that the sleeve valve Centaurus engine is very sensitive to certain additives in the engine oil, and the last of the "proper" oil was lost in the big oil refinery fire a few years ago, which has contributed to engine failiures on Sea Furys. Can't find the reference again but hopefully this one will be ok.

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Thursday 12th October 2023
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
I remember reading somewhere that the sleeve valve Centaurus engine is very sensitive to certain additives in the engine oil, and the last of the "proper" oil was lost in the big oil refinery fire a few years ago, which has contributed to engine failiures on Sea Furys.
Yes, that was the rumour, that the remaining stock of the last batch made by Shell in the 80's was in one of the storage tanks at Buncefield when that went bang 20 years ago.
Not ever seen confirmation of that though.




GliderRider

2,113 posts

82 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
lufbramatt said:
I remember reading somewhere that the sleeve valve Centaurus engine is very sensitive to certain additives in the engine oil, and the last of the "proper" oil was lost in the big oil refinery fire a few years ago, which has contributed to engine failiures on Sea Furys.
Yes, that was the rumour, that the remaining stock of the last batch made by Shell in the 80's was in one of the storage tanks at Buncefield when that went bang 20 years ago.
Not ever seen confirmation of that though.
Keen to find out what was so special about the Shell 100U oil specified for Bristol's sleeve valve engines, a web search revealed that tri-cresyl-phosphate was used to alleviate corrosion of cadmium alloy big-end floating bushes and Paranox 56, a barium compound, to stop the top ring sticking at the top of the cylinder. It appears that shock-cooling upon closing the throttle can cause the cylinder sleeve to distort, so an anti-seize additive would seem appropriate.

Engine Oil - Bristol Sleeve Valves

Tri-cresyl-phosphate has been linked to polyneuropathy (nerve damage), so that may have been a contributing factor to its non-availability.


Edited by GliderRider on Friday 13th October 17:20

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
GliderRider said:
Tri-cresyl-phosphate has been linked to polyneuropathy (nerve damage), so that may have been a contributing factor to its non-availability.
Only reason for its non-availability was there was no demand from military or commercial civilian users to warrant Shell to make another batch after the last order from UK and French military and civilian users in the 80's.
Shell would only make it in large amounts, and with the imminent demise of the French Noratlas fleet, and with the already gone German Sea Fury TT fleet, as well as RAF Hastings fleets, that only left the RNHF Sea Fury, Bristol Freighter's in NZ and the civilian warbird Sea Fury/Fury numbers.
Rolls-Royce warned the US and UK civilian Sea Fury owners that they needed to get together and come up with a plan for the oil, but there was a lack on interest to organise anything. No doubt, the view for the US owners was that, they'd just re-engine them with US engines anyway, so there was never going to be a way of getting Shell to make any more in the large quantity that Shell required for another batch to be made.


Yertis

18,060 posts

267 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
So what’s this Tempest using I wonder? (hopefully not just crossed fingers)

aeropilot

34,666 posts

228 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Yertis said:
So what’s this Tempest using I wonder? (hopefully not just crossed fingers)
Probably the same as what the other few remaining Centaurus operators are using.



zsdom

794 posts

121 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
If they didnt have anything suitable for the engine the CAA wouldnt allow it to fly