Discussion
saaby93 said:
Coatesy351 said:
This was how they were moved to Woodford for assembly.
Even broken down its still a big thing to shift.
Does the Haynes manual give the detail
That could be managable
This was done while aircraft was still in service with all available equipment including overhead crane and designed trestles, trained techs, and full resources of the RAF.
aeropilot said:
saaby93 said:
Coatesy351 said:
This was how they were moved to Woodford for assembly.
Even broken down its still a big thing to shift.
Does the Haynes manual give the detail
That could be managable
This was done while aircraft was still in service with all available equipment including overhead crane and designed trestles, trained techs, and full resources of the RAF.
Wheres dr_gn?
saaby93 said:
aeropilot said:
saaby93 said:
Coatesy351 said:
This was how they were moved to Woodford for assembly.
Even broken down its still a big thing to shift.
Does the Haynes manual give the detail
That could be managable
This was done while aircraft was still in service with all available equipment including overhead crane and designed trestles, trained techs, and full resources of the RAF.
Wheres dr_gn?
saaby93 said:
In some ways an exhibit could be good having the separate pieces prior to assembly.
Wheres dr_gn?
I've heard worse ideas.Wheres dr_gn?
As this thread has pointed out repeatedly - there are 2 ground running Vulcans in the UK and numerous static Vulcans at museums around the World - but there's nowhere where you can see the engineering that's inside the aircraft.
If VTTS actually want a STEM legacy for XH558 for the benefit of future generations, this is probably it.
Seight_Returns said:
saaby93 said:
In some ways an exhibit could be good having the separate pieces prior to assembly.
Wheres dr_gn?
I've heard worse ideas.Wheres dr_gn?
As this thread has pointed out repeatedly - there are 2 ground running Vulcans in the UK and numerous static Vulcans at museums around the World - but there's nowhere where you can see the engineering that's inside the aircraft.
If VTTS actually want a STEM legacy for XH558 for the benefit of future generations, this is probably it.
ecsrobin said:
Seight_Returns said:
saaby93 said:
In some ways an exhibit could be good having the separate pieces prior to assembly.
Wheres dr_gn?
I've heard worse ideas.Wheres dr_gn?
As this thread has pointed out repeatedly - there are 2 ground running Vulcans in the UK and numerous static Vulcans at museums around the World - but there's nowhere where you can see the engineering that's inside the aircraft.
If VTTS actually want a STEM legacy for XH558 for the benefit of future generations, this is probably it.
I'd be up for that!
MarkwG said:
saaby93 said:
aeropilot said:
saaby93 said:
Coatesy351 said:
This was how they were moved to Woodford for assembly.
Even broken down its still a big thing to shift.
Does the Haynes manual give the detail
That could be managable
This was done while aircraft was still in service with all available equipment including overhead crane and designed trestles, trained techs, and full resources of the RAF.
Wheres dr_gn?
I can't believe we're still having this conversation.
Speaking as a child of the Cold War era I was a massive fan of the work that VTTS did in getting XH-558 flying again.
I went to loads of airshows and events to see it, but always knew it would come to an end some day.
Its USP was that it was the last flying Vulcan. Now it is just another Vulcan without a permanent home.
The logical place for it is in an aviation museum, alongside other exhibits. As a standalone exhibit it is not financially viable.
All suitable aviation museums already have one if they want one.
Ergo there is nowhere for it to go, it is categorically never flying out of DSA, and the cost of road transport to an unknown unsuitable destination is prohibitive.
Scrapping it in situ at DSA is likely the only possible solution, sad though that is.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff