A320 lands in the Hudson River, New York
Discussion
dave_s13 said:
tinman0 said:
How long before we see the crash landing from a mobile phone? Place your bets now.
I bet you 50 virtual pounds nobody got it.It would've been on telly by now, surely?
Edited by dave_s13 on Thursday 15th January 22:08
Ben
BigBen said:
dave_s13 said:
tinman0 said:
How long before we see the crash landing from a mobile phone? Place your bets now.
I bet you 50 virtual pounds nobody got it.It would've been on telly by now, surely?
Edited by dave_s13 on Thursday 15th January 22:08
Ben
Zad said:
There probably would have been a smell of smoke/fuel in the cabin as the aircon units would be pumping in air from outside the plane.
From what they were saying on pPrune, the A320 has a ditching button, it closes the air con intakes and the like.The plane is now pretty much underwater right now from what I am seeing, just the tip of the tail showing.
RDE said:
People on board said:
"We heard a loud bang, the whole plane shook and immediately we could smell smoke and fire."
I'm not joking about this - *if* it was a birdstrike, what they could smell was more than likely a hint of roast goose/burnt feathers."We heard a loud bang, the whole plane shook and immediately we could smell smoke and fire."
A few years back I had a relatively minor bird-strike on approach in to Venice where we almost certainly ingested a small number of sparrow/swift sized birds and there was a distinct smell of cooked chicken on the flight deck.
BBC Website - Onlooker said:
It made a pretty big splash when it landed on the water
Really? Fancy that! That's some quality reporting!
Good on the pilot, could have been a whole lot worse! There's not exactly a lot of places to land in that area, especially if you're flying away from the runway!
mattley said:
Captain Cadillac said:
What's really lucky for them is that the plane landed in a very busy part of the river, it basically landed in the middle of the NY Waterway ferry line.
Not sure it was blind luck, awesome piloting seems to have taken a part.Anyhow, if you had to ditch on the water, that's the place to be located, right next to midtown Manhattan.
Zad said:
If it had had more altitude/power/inertia it could probably have landed at Newark, which isn't that far away.
Based on how it turned compared to how they depart from LaGuardia, I would assume he was heading to Newark or trying to return to LaGuardia. Where the plane ditched is only about 5-6 miles from there but when you lose thrust at 3,000 feet that's quite the distance to cover I would think.Captain Cadillac said:
mattley said:
Captain Cadillac said:
What's really lucky for them is that the plane landed in a very busy part of the river, it basically landed in the middle of the NY Waterway ferry line.
Not sure it was blind luck, awesome piloting seems to have taken a part.Anyhow, if you had to ditch on the water, that's the place to be located, right next to midtown Manhattan.
Mojocvh said:
Captain Cadillac said:
mattley said:
Captain Cadillac said:
What's really lucky for them is that the plane landed in a very busy part of the river, it basically landed in the middle of the NY Waterway ferry line.
Not sure it was blind luck, awesome piloting seems to have taken a part.Anyhow, if you had to ditch on the water, that's the place to be located, right next to midtown Manhattan.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff