What do you think is the best looking jet ever made?

What do you think is the best looking jet ever made?

Author
Discussion

thatone1967

4,193 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th December 2009
quotequote all
well it ain't this? does not mean I don't love the aircraft though!


Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th December 2009
quotequote all
Have to agree. It is a bit of a lump.

Maybe the stretched versions - if and when they are built - will look better.

thatone1967

4,193 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th December 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Have to agree. It is a bit of a lump.

Maybe the stretched versions - if and when they are built - will look better.
you are right...

AstonV12

5,305 posts

209 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
For me it's the menacing, yet elegant and much unloved IMO Rockwell B1:




AstonV12

5,305 posts

209 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Slagathore said:


Mostly because I remember having a game featuring it years ago.

F22 ADF? Phenomenal game IMO

YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
AstonV12 said:
For me it's the menacing, yet elegant and much unloved IMO Rockwell B1:
unloved?!

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
YAD061 said:
AstonV12 said:
For me it's the menacing, yet elegant and much unloved IMO Rockwell B1:
unloved?!
Yes - unloved by whom?

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
YAD061 said:
AstonV12 said:
For me it's the menacing, yet elegant and much unloved IMO Rockwell B1:
unloved?!
Yes - unloved by whom?
wavey me!

thatone1967

4,193 posts

192 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
AstonV12 said:
Slagathore said:


Mostly because I remember having a game featuring it years ago.

F22 ADF? Phenomenal game IMO
reminds me of my trip to New York in 2000, they had a demo on board the USS Forrestal where you got to fly one...

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Are you sure it wasn't the USS Intrepid?

thatone1967

4,193 posts

192 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Are you sure it wasn't the USS Intrepid?
Possibly....bow

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Intrepid is moored as a museum at the end of 42nd Street (if my memory is correct). She was recently totally refurbished.

Wadeski

8,162 posts

214 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Blackbird or Concorde - any other answer is just silly


ninja-lewis

4,242 posts

191 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Aside from the obvious Concorde, I grew up going to airshows and loving the Red Arrows so to the Hawk to me has always been what a jet should look like. The same with the yellow Sea Kings.





Unfortunately, they ruined the lines of the later models with the stretched nose.

dudleybloke

19,846 posts

187 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
YAD061 said:
AstonV12 said:
For me it's the menacing, yet elegant and much unloved IMO Rockwell B1:
unloved?!
Yes - unloved by whom?
unloved by congress and the US taxpayer! smile

Dominic H

3,275 posts

233 months

Friday 1st January 2010
quotequote all
MPoxon said:
RDMcG said:
This...... Blackbird

+1 For the almighty Blackbird
A favourite anecdote about the SR-71....

"Ripping
across the barren deserts 80,000 feet below us, I could already see
the coast of California from the Arizona border. I was, finally, after
many humbling months of simulators and study, ahead of the jet.

I was beginning to feel a bit sorry for Walter in the back seat. There
he was, with no really good view of the incredible sights before us,
tasked with monitoring four different radios. This was good practice
for him for when we began flying real missions, when a priority
transmission from headquarters could be vital. It had been difficult,
too, for me to relinquish control of the radios, as during my entire
flying career I had controlled my own transmissions. But it was part
of the division of duties in this plane and I had adjusted to it. I
still insisted on talking on the radio while we were on the ground,
however. Walt was so good at many things, but he couldn't match my
expertise at sounding smooth on the radios, a skill that had been
honed sharply with years in fighter squadrons where the slightest
radio miscue was grounds for beheading. He understood that and allowed
me that luxury.


Just to get a sense of what Walt had to contend with, I pulled the
radio toggle switches and monitored the frequencies along with him.
The predominant radio chatter was from Los Angeles Center, far below
us, controlling daily traffic in their sector. While they had us on
their scope (albeit briefly), we were in uncontrolled airspace and
normally would not talk to them unless we needed to descend into their
airspace.


We listened as the shaky voice of a lone Cessna pilot asked Center for
a readout of his ground speed. Center replied: "November Charlie 175,
I'm showing you at ninety knots on the ground."


Now the thing to understand about Center controllers, was that whether
they were talking to a rookie pilot in a Cessna, or to Air Force One,
they always spoke in the exact same, calm, deep, professional, tone
that made one feel important. I referred to it as the " Houston Center
voice." I have always felt that after years of seeing documentaries on
this country's space program and listening to the calm and distinct
voice of the Houston controllers, that all other controllers since
then wanted to sound like that, and that they basically did.
And it didn't matter what sector of the country we would be flying in,
it always seemed like the same guy was talking. Over the years that
tone of voice had become somewhat of a comforting sound to pilots
everywhere. Conversely, over the years, pilots always wanted to ensure
that, when transmitting, they sounded like Chuck Yeager, or at least
like John Wayne. Better to die than sound bad on the radios.


Just moments after the Cessna's inquiry, a Twin Beech piped up on
frequency, in a rather superior tone, asking for his ground speed. "I
have you at one hundred and twenty-five knots of ground speed." Boy, I
thought, the Beechcraft really must think he is dazzling his Cessna
brethren. Then out of the blue, a navy F-18 pilot out of NAS Lemoore
came up on frequency. You knew right away it was a Navy jock because
he sounded very cool on the radios. "Center, Dusty 52 ground speed
check". Before Center could reply, I'm thinking to myself, hey, Dusty
52 has a ground speed indicator in that million-dollar cockpit, so why
is he asking Center for a readout? Then I got it, ol' Dusty here is
making sure that every bug smasher from Mount Whitney to the Mojave
knows what true speed is. He's the fastest dude in the valley today,
and he just wants everyone to know how much fun he is having in his
new Hornet. And the reply, always with that same, calm, voice, with
more distinct alliteration than emotion: "Dusty 52, Center, we have
you at 620 on the ground."


And I thought to myself, is this a ripe situation, or what? As my hand
instinctively reached for the mic button, I had to remind myself that
Walt was in control of the radios. Still, I thought, it must be done -
in mere seconds we'll be out of the sector and the opportunity will be
lost. That Hornet must die, and die now. I thought about all of our
Sim training and how important it was that we developed well as a crew
and knew that to jump in on the radios now would destroy the integrity
of all that we had worked toward becoming. I was torn.


Somewhere, 13 miles above Arizona, there was a pilot screaming inside
his space helmet. Then, I heard it. The click of the mic button from
the back seat. That was the very moment that I knew Walter and I had
become a crew. Very professionally, and with no emotion, Walter spoke:
"Los Angeles Center, Aspen 20, can you give us a ground speed check?"
There was no hesitation, and the replay came as if was an everyday
request. "Aspen 20, I show you at one thousand eight hundred and
forty-two knots, across the ground."


I think it was the forty-two knots that I liked the best, so accurate
and proud was Center to deliver that information without hesitation,
and you just knew he was smiling. But the precise point at which I
knew that Walt and I were going to be really good friends for a long
time was when he keyed the mic once again to say, in his most
fighter-pilot-like voice: "Ah, Center, much thanks, we're showing
closer to nineteen hundred on the money."

For a moment Walter was a god. And we finally heard a little crack in
the armor of the Houston Center voice, when L.A.came back with, "Roger
that Aspen, Your equipment is probably more accurate than ours. You
boys have a good one."

It all had lasted for just moments, but in that short, memorable
sprint across the southwest, the Navy had been flamed, all mortal
airplanes on freq were forced to bow before the King of Speed, and
more importantly, Walter and I had crossed the threshold of being a
crew. A fine day's work. We never heard another transmission on that
frequency all the way to the coast.

For just one day, it truly was fun being the fastest guys out there."






Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Friday 1st January 2010
quotequote all
Ninja-Lewis.

Stretched noses?

Are you talking about Concorde?

All production Concordes had the same nose, visor and coclpit windows. The first two prototypes had a different shaped nose because they had a metal visor that was raised for supersonic flight. It was never intended that this arrangement would be used for the operational variants as the aircraft would not have received a permit to carry passengers without the flight crew having forward vision.

Prototype F-WTSS



Production Concorde G-BOAC


magpie215

4,403 posts

190 months

Friday 1st January 2010
quotequote all
Not had a look through so sorry if a repost but always thought this looked quite a nice machine


aeropilot

34,663 posts

228 months

Friday 1st January 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Ninja-Lewis.

Stretched noses?

Are you talking about Concorde?
I think he's referring to the Hawk....and the Hawk 100


Roop

6,012 posts

285 months

Friday 1st January 2010
quotequote all
Some good choices here. I'll tip a couple into the mix.

I always like the look of the BAe EAP:


In fact, I'm a sucker for canards / foreplanes / pushers...

Beech Starship:


Gates/Piaggio P.180 Avanti:


LearAvia LearFan:


Dassault Rafale:


Moving on from the canard/foreplane stuff...

I got to have a poke around this A-12 at the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. What a fantastic piece of kit. Don't realise how small it is until you get up close. Gaffer almost tipped it off it's wheels rocking it about complaining that it must be a fake one made of cardboard as it was far too small to be a real one and clearly weighed nothing:


Finally, this Hunter specifically wink