Navy's Newest Ship - "Pirate Fighter"

Navy's Newest Ship - "Pirate Fighter"

Author
Discussion

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

232 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Needing only 15 feet of draft while being 417 feet long and capable of 50 knots, this could be a pirate fighter. This made it onto an "Ugliest Ships" webpage. hehe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Independence_(LCS...

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=h...

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink

ErnestM

11,621 posts

268 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
It's main gun system is a piece of work:

http://www.baesystems.com/ProductsServices/l_and_a...

IIRC, programmable fuses. Proximity, delayed det or contact. Saw a show on Discovery on the gun. Nasty.

I would say if they used this off the African coast, picking up pirate survivors wouldn't be an issue.

captainzep

13,305 posts

193 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
baesystems sales blurb said:
"Littoral Combat"
Anyone else imagining some very funny mispronunciations in very serious Naval arms procurement meetings?

"So what scenarios do you envisage this weapon to be deployed in Admiral?"

"Well, largely clittor...LITTORAL combat er... settings [cough]"


Twincharged

1,851 posts

206 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
The Sea Shadow- entered service in 1985.
Currently the US Navy are trying to give it away, but they've had no offers as they inist that the recipient also take the Hughes Mining Barge (which is a large dry dock ship used as a "garage" to hide it from satellites.)


Fishtigua

9,786 posts

196 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
In the Times yesterday, the Navy said they could no longer afford to keep a Frigete in the Caribbean.

For hurricane/druggie duty they will be sending a refueling/task ship which is a much better use of resources. A unit of Marines, a couple of fast RIBs, medical facilities and a few choppers, thats all they need.

As for pirates, just machine-gun the beggers.

I used to have to stand pirate-watch each night, fore or aft, with a M16 and a flaregun around the Malacca Straits; nothings new there in 25 years.

OliverTwist

1,292 posts

173 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Good program on nat geo 9pm tonight about that American cargo ship where they ended up taking the Somali's hostage's instead.

RizzoTheRat

25,273 posts

193 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
captainzep said:
baesystems sales blurb said:
"Littoral Combat"
Anyone else imagining some very funny mispronunciations in very serious Naval arms procurement meetings?

"So what scenarios do you envisage this weapon to be deployed in Admiral?"

"Well, largely clittor...LITTORAL combat er... settings [cough]"
Alas its such a commonly used term that such mixups never even occour to people biggrin

Previoulsy the largest Trimaran was British, the RV Triton


The original LCS class are even shallower draft but not quite as quick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Freedom_%28LCS-1%...



Edited by RizzoTheRat on Sunday 24th January 11:17

FourWheelDrift

88,691 posts

285 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Twincharged said:
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
The Sea Shadow- entered service in 1985.
Currently the US Navy are trying to give it away, but they've had no offers as they inist that the recipient also take the Hughes Mining Barge (which is a large dry dock ship used as a "garage" to hide it from satellites.)

I hear Rupert Murdoch is interested in it, can't think why. wink

soad

32,947 posts

177 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Looks good, interesting design features. thumbup

Taffer

2,139 posts

198 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Twincharged said:
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
The Sea Shadow- entered service in 1985.
Currently the US Navy are trying to give it away, but they've had no offers as they inist that the recipient also take the Hughes Mining Barge (which is a large dry dock ship used as a "garage" to hide it from satellites.)

They're trying to give away the Sea Shadow?



Hmmmmm, PH Group buy, then add Somalia to the PH tours list (RPGs and AKs included)? scratchchin

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

232 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
My "point"? I just think it is rather interesting in a "cool new toy" sort of way. What is the point on PH when someone posts another "what car for 2k" thread for that matter. smile To answer you question, the point is a design that allows a ship that large to travel in very shallow water is interesting and new IMO. "Stealth" was never mentioned. Although pirate fighting was not in mind during design, it could do that job.



Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 24th January 14:53

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

232 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Twincharged said:
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
The Sea Shadow- entered service in 1985.
Currently the US Navy are trying to give it away, but they've had no offers as they inist that the recipient also take the Hughes Mining Barge (which is a large dry dock ship used as a "garage" to hide it from satellites.)

I hear Rupert Murdoch is interested in it, can't think why. wink
Now that was good. hehe

bobthemonkey

3,847 posts

217 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Twincharged said:
Famous Graham said:
Ah...the Stealth Ship.

Only a few years behind the Stealth Fighter. And the Stealth Bomber.

What was your point again? wink
The Sea Shadow- entered service in 1985.
Currently the US Navy are trying to give it away, but they've had no offers as they inist that the recipient also take the Hughes Mining Barge (which is a large dry dock ship used as a "garage" to hide it from satellites.)

I hear Rupert Murdoch is interested in it, can't think why. wink
Now that was good. hehe
Very very good.

Simpo Two

85,784 posts

266 months

Sunday 24th January 2010
quotequote all
Hmm, now that reminds me of something...

Sea Shadow:



Merrimac/Virgina:


Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
It is not hardware that is lacking in pirate-fighting, it is political will. There be plenty of shallow draft vessels available, there be hovercraft and rigid raiders. There be midget subs and zodiacs launched from larger subs. All that be needed to shiver the pirate's timbers be the word from the poiliticos.




perdu

4,884 posts

200 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
It is not hardware that is lacking in pirate-fighting, it is political will. There be plenty of shallow draft vessels available, there be hovercraft and rigid raiders. There be midget subs and zodiacs launched from larger subs. All that be needed to shiver the pirate's timbers be the word from the poiliticos.
completely taken the wind from my sails with this comment

just exactly what I wanted to say

still

there USED TO BE A NAVY...

standing by whilst pirates attacked that yacht, disgusting.

Simpo Two

85,784 posts

266 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
It's quite amazing how we fanny about impotently when they could be squashed like insects. Hitler would have fixed it in a few days with 1940s technology - it could easily be done even with WW1 technology...

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

232 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It's quite amazing how we fanny about impotently when they could be squashed like insects. Hitler would have fixed it in a few days with 1940s technology - it could easily be done even with WW1 technology...
Would not our ancestors be baffled at why we have not yet dealt with this?

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Simpo Two said:
It's quite amazing how we fanny about impotently when they could be squashed like insects. Hitler would have fixed it in a few days with 1940s technology - it could easily be done even with WW1 technology...
Would not our ancestors be baffled at why we have not yet dealt with this?
Hitler be damned; the Israelis would have fixed it long ago too.

I would bet a small sum of money that there is a SBS/SAS team ready and waiting with a plan that has been rehearsed time and again and is just awaiting the 'go' signal.

It is a balancing act for Winky

Do nothing and see the hostages killed = election nightmare
Do nothing and hostages not killed = OK for now so bide time
Act and hostages killed = well, we tried...risky electorally, so don't do it yet
Act and hostages rescued = Smiles and medals all round and Winky gets re-elected!