Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)
Discussion
jimmyjimjim said:
Mr Will said:
dr_gn said:
Eric Mc said:
chuntington101 said:
Odie said:
Just on firing through prop blades,
iirc the first pilot to do it just had "deflector" plates fitted to the back of his prop, then the mechanic timer was developed that would stop the gun from firing when a prop blade was in the way (similar to a cambelt/cam arrangement)
Some very cool pictures in this thread
I always wondered how they fired through the prop. Be intresting to see and engine driven gun! bet the RPM of it would be stupidly high! loliirc the first pilot to do it just had "deflector" plates fitted to the back of his prop, then the mechanic timer was developed that would stop the gun from firing when a prop blade was in the way (similar to a cambelt/cam arrangement)
Some very cool pictures in this thread
His aircraft eventually force landed on the wrong side of the lines and the deflector system was sent to Anthony Fokker for him to replicate for his aircraft. He went one better and designed a mecahnical/hydraulic interrupter ssystem for his Fokker E1.
This type of system becvame the norm for use on all fighter aircraft where bullets had to pass through a spinning propellor.
Notwithstanding the canon vs. MG issue, I wonder what the true rate of fire was for a Spitfire or Hurricane with 8 MG's unsynchronised vs the Bf 109E with it's 2 synchronised MG's and 2 MGFF cannon ?
But I'm probably wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupter_gear
The early system was dependant on engine rpm so the effect was quite pronounced, later systems had only a small effect on the rate of fire.
The Browning machine guns used in Spitfires had a rate of fire of 1200-1500rpm (for the Mk2 and Mk2* iirc), so up to 12,000rpm for 8 guns.(!). Tearing calico as they say.
The Bf109 mg131's were 900rpm, per gun. The cannon was about 750 rpm. Obviously, all these figures are 'out of the aircraft', but I wouldn't be surprised if the Germans got pretty close to those numbers.
There's a remark somewhere (on the Bf109 or the MG131 article) about using electrically primed ammunition to get the maximum fire rate when using syncronisation.
Out of interest, I did a quick back of a fag packet calc on firepower:
Browning Mk2 - 12,000 rounds, 11.3 grams per round equals a throw weight of 135.6Kg/min.
MG131 - 900 rounds, 2 guns, 38.5grams per round = 69.3Kg/min.
MG151/20 - 750 rounds, 72 grams per round = 54Kg/Min
Combined for a total throw of 123.3Kg/min.
Not far off the spitfire/hurricane, but simpler, and with the benefit of a good chunk of it being HE.
however it would be intresting to see what and engine driven, or the drive tyaken off the prop, powered gun could diliver. hmmmm how about a 5 cylinder revolver 20mm? wonder what the rater of fire could be with one of them? lol
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Rouleur said:
Some pics of Western a/c intercepting those pesky Ruskies
* This one was actually an escort situation rather than an interception
12 Sqn 'Banana' shadowing a Soviet Sovremenny Class Destroyer?* This one was actually an escort situation rather than an interception
I'm guessing during one of the MEDEXs out of Gibraltar.
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Rouleur said:
Some pics of Western a/c intercepting those pesky Ruskies
* This one was actually an escort situation rather than an interception
12 Sqn 'Banana' shadowing a Soviet Sovremenny Class Destroyer?* This one was actually an escort situation rather than an interception
I'm guessing during one of the MEDEXs out of Gibraltar.
Hugo a Gogo said:
something to do with a camel?
In the case of the F-16 and SU-27 the Sukhoi was on its way to an airshow and therefore had permission to pass through foreign airspace, so it was 'escorted', whereas a 'shadowed' a/c is one which is somewhere it shouldn't be.
Edited by Rouleur on Thursday 2nd September 21:26
Rouleur said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
something to do with a camel?
In the case of the F-16 and SU-27 the Sukhoi was on its way to an airshow and therefore had permission to pass through foreign airspace, so it was 'escorted', whereas a 'shadowed' a/c is one which is somewhere it shouldn't be.
Edited by Rouleur on Thursday 2nd September 21:26
DieselGriff said:
That's a 208 SQN aircraft, note the eyed wing on the tail, the blue "triangle" on the front of aircraft and lack of fox on the intake.
You are of course quite correct. For some reason I confused myself that 12 had the triangle.
Still can't see the flying eye though - failing eyesight I guess.
208 Penetrate!
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
DieselGriff said:
That's a 208 SQN aircraft, note the eyed wing on the tail, the blue "triangle" on the front of aircraft and lack of fox on the intake.
You are of course quite correct. For some reason I confused myself that 12 had the triangle.
Still can't see the flying eye though - failing eyesight I guess.
208 Penetrate!
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
happygoron said:
Ooooh Saab Draken, still beautiful!The Swedes made/make some cracking a/c!
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff