Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,091 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
The two seat Vampires also had wooden fuselages.

Here's a picture of an NF10 under restoration



In fact, some of the two seat Vampires didn't have ejector seats either.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
There is an interesting series on Netflix about aircraft restoration including a Percival Q6 that had a similar curved plywood construction.

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
In De Havilland's original concepts for what became the Comet, one version the aircraft had no tailplane. It was because of this proposed design that they built the three DH108 Swallows - all of which crashed.



Are you doubly sure about that? IIRC the Swallow was purely a supersonic research aircraft

Eric Mc

122,091 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
It was a research aircraft which was designed to test the handling characteristics of a tailless design. The reason why they wanted to test the concept was because they were looking at tailless configurations for their upcoming jet transport/airliner - which became the Comet.

You can see some of the tail less Comet ideas in the drawings I posted up.

Obviously, being a jet design, it had the potential to be supersonic and we all know that it was the first British aircraft to officially break the sound barrier. But that wasn't its prime raison d'etre. In fact, it was not that great a design when it came to transonic flight with some very, very bad handling characteristics. It was just such problems that caused the death of Geoffrey deHavilland Jnr. Eric Brown described it simply as "a killer".

There aircraft were built and one of the three was designed deliberately to be a slow machine so they could investigate the slow speed handling of a tailless design.

perdu

4,884 posts

200 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
perdu said:
I'm not surprised

The vibration of a bang seat going off would have shaken the little wooden fuselage apart
At the risk of a parrot, once you're pulling the big yellow handle do you care if the aircraft falls to bits afterwards?
smile



I do have this nice blue one

From Norway I understand

That nice Mr Palin left it in the cupboard at Broadcasting House and it's been homeless ever since

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
Are you doubly sure about that? IIRC the Swallow was purely a supersonic research aircraft
There was quite a love afair going on with the tailless delta in the late 1940s (based upon the fact the Germans had got it to work with the Me163 Komet) with a desire for jet transport aircraft of that configuration.

Aside from DH producing the DH108 as a stepping stone towards a proposed tailless Comet, Armstrong-Whitworth produced the AW52 as research project for a possible airliner (the proposal was later binned).

Interestingly both suffered problems with unstable fugoid pitch oscillation (probably as a result of elevon flutter). In the case of the AW52, this was the first aircraft in which a bang seat was used in anger - Test Pilot Jo Lancaster DFC ejecting from the first prototype on 30 May 1949.




Edited by Ginetta G15 Girl on Thursday 19th January 18:38

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It was a research aircraft which was designed to test the handling characteristics of a tailless design. The reason why they wanted to test the concept was because they were looking at tailless configurations for their upcoming jet transport/airliner - which became the Comet.

You can see some of the tail less Comet ideas in the drawings I posted up.

Obviously, being a jet design, it had the potential to be supersonic and we all know that it was the first British aircraft to officially break the sound barrier. But that wasn't its prime raison d'etre. In fact, it was not that great a design when it came to transonic flight with some very, very bad handling characteristics. It was just such problems that caused the death of Geoffrey deHavilland Jnr. Eric Brown described it simply as "a killer".

There aircraft were built and one of the three was designed deliberately to be a slow machine so they could investigate the slow speed handling of a tailless design.
Interesting, I thought it was just a jet powered copy of the Me163.

Eric Mc

122,091 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
It was certainly inspired to some extent by the 163. However, being British there was a "parts bin" aspect to it with much of its design being made up of Vampire components.

The 163 was quite a good flier - mainly because it was developed from the tailless glider work carried out by Lippisch and the German research group, DFS (nothing to do with cheap furniture).

Brown flew the 163 too and found it very pleasant from a handling point of view.

tight5

2,747 posts

160 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all


Predecessor of the Fouga Magister

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
No wheel, no problem

MartG

20,696 posts

205 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
No wheel, no problem
Video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRtlM6IoH-Y

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Stickyfinger said:
No wheel, no problem
Video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRtlM6IoH-Y
Seems a "British-style" engineering solution - nose gear doesn't work properly, so instead of fixing it we'll bring a rest. Surprised how hard he dropped the plane onto it though, I wouldn't have thought that part of the plane was designed to bounce.

MartG

20,696 posts

205 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Seems a "British-style" engineering solution - nose gear doesn't work properly, so instead of fixing it we'll bring a rest.
How do you expect them to fix it while the aircraft is in flight ?

As for the 'stool' - it's a maintenance support

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
How do you expect them to fix it while the aircraft is in flight ?

As for the 'stool' - it's a maintenance support
I bet the pilot had a stool

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

136 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
A glimpse of a dream about a pilot's life:



And somebody's clearly living that dream.

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Darling, just going to the shed to do some fishing smile

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
A glimpse of a dream about a pilot's life:



And somebody's clearly living that dream.
Is that Marco Porco's house?

LimaDelta

6,533 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th January 2017
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
A glimpse of a dream about a pilot's life:



And somebody's clearly living that dream.
Don't forget the tropical getaway.


MartG

20,696 posts

205 months

Tuesday 24th January 2017
quotequote all
Not your usual traffic queue



J35D in Linköping, southern Sweden, SAAB headquarters, 1966
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED