Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I can see CofG issues too.

LotusOmega375D

7,651 posts

154 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
The two guys holding the wings are the undercarriage. When the aircraft lifts off, they "retract" behind each wingtip, thus balancing the CoG. When it slows down to land they drop down again and start running to facilitate a perfect landing. It's actually a very clever design.

Eric Mc

122,077 posts

266 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
I'm not altogether convinced I have to say. I'm sure the wing struts wouldn't be beefy enough either. Also, the pilot would need to be VERY careful when those props are rotating.


CanAm

9,252 posts

273 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I'm trying to figure out where they put the fuel.
Eric, surely you know it's all a huge conspiracy and aeroplanes run on compressed air.

CanAm

9,252 posts

273 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I'm not altogether convinced I have to say. I'm sure the wing struts wouldn't be beefy enough either. Also, the pilot would need to be VERY careful when those props are rotating.
Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change? biggrin

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Centre of drag is too far below the vector of the engine thrust, unless there is massive elevator authority this will instantly nose dive into the ground.

However, inverted, it would be great at looping the loop and a definite crowd pleaser at airshows.

gothatway

5,783 posts

171 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
As a mere civvie, all I'm interested in knowing is - where are the trolley dollies ?

Eric Mc

122,077 posts

266 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
Eric Mc said:
I'm not altogether convinced I have to say. I'm sure the wing struts wouldn't be beefy enough either. Also, the pilot would need to be VERY careful when those props are rotating.
Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change? biggrin
Man - maybe it's the original astral plane?

MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
Big, isn't it smile


mko9

2,383 posts

213 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Big, isn't it smile

Why didn't they just fly it to the destination? Duh!

FourWheelDrift

88,561 posts

285 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
Don't be silly, lorries can't fly.

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

136 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Big, isn't it smile

Tricky thing, shifting those non-flying crates. Someone in German special forces logistics must have relied on Google Maps for working out the route to the base. This lump got all the way from Talinn before getting stuck at a sneaky new roundabout near the base:


MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
mko9 said:
MartG said:
Big, isn't it smile

Why didn't they just fly it to the destination? Duh!
Not in flyable condition - apparently they'd been impounded due to non-payment of bills, stored for a couple of years before being sold, then were being trucked to Zeebrugge to be shipped off to whoever had bought them

MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

136 months

Saturday 23rd February 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Stealth? Disguise your warplane as a cloud. Ingenious!

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

136 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
This link must surely have been posted already, but I don't remember seeing it.

Dozens of 360-degree in-cockpit photos from a fantastic collection of warbirds:

https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Virtual-To...

(I fully expected to see a solder station somewhere in those old old MiG cocokpits.)


yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all


Special Duties Flight, Sculthorpe, 1952 to 1954.

4 x North American RB-45 (Tornado) aircraft leased to the RAF to carry out reconnaissance missions over the Soviet Union, because the USAF were forbidden (by the US President) to overfly the USSR unless a state of war existed.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/milita...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOZkXJHDdOM

MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Thursday 28th February 2019
quotequote all
CANBERRA PR9 EMERGENCY INTER-CREW COMMUNICATION
20th CENTURY TECHNOLOGY

The photograph shows the emergency intercom device as fitted to the CANBERRA PR9.

Should the PR9 aircraft Type A1961 electric intercom fail, communication between to two crew members was still possible through the normal UHF/VHF radio, or by the two frequency (243/243.8) emergency radio. However, in the situation of complete failure of electronic communication, the ‘stick’ shown in the photograph could be used to pass messages between crew members. Cockpit noise precluded normal conversation, even by shouting.

The emergency communication stick was located in the navigator’s compartment, held in a spring clip, mounted on the floor, under the navigator’s ejection seat.

Uniquely, in the PR9, the navigator sits in front of the pilot, at his own station, access to which is by a swinging nose ‘door’. Although there is not a bulkhead, access from the navigators compartment to the pilots station is not possible. Racking behind the navigators ejection seat holds various pieces of electronic equipment, controls and kit. However, at approximately navigator head height, which was at about the height of pilot’s feet, there was a small open area just in front of the pilot’s feet, through which the end of the ‘stick’ could be pushed.

In the case of electronic intercommunication failure, the navigator was to write down (on a suitable piece of paper) whatever information that he wished to pass to the pilot. Using the ‘Bulldog’ clip, he would attach this to the ‘stick’. He would then unstrap from his seat, turn around and kneel upon it. He would then poke the ‘stick’ through the gap behind the seat, and get the pilot’s attention by banging the ‘Bulldog’ clip against the pilot’s flying boot.

At this point, the pilot was supposed to engage the autopilot, and after unstrapping, lean forward and down and remove the note, being careful not to lean too firmly against the control column, as this would disengage the autopilot (rather like touching the brake/throttle when in cruise control in your car) and put the aircraft into a dive.

This emergency communication device was removed from PR9 aircraft in the late 1980’s, when a second UHF radio was fitted during ‘Major’ servicing.

The ‘stick’ in the photographs is from XH134. It was rescued from a rubbish bin at Shorts Bros, Belfast. One photograph shows the ‘stick’ in the stowing, short, length, the other when it is extended. Stowed it is 50 cm (20 inches) long, and fully extended it is 106 cm (42 inches).

( Sydney John Deakin‎ via Facebook )




Gary29

4,164 posts

100 months

Thursday 28th February 2019
quotequote all

RicksAlfas

13,410 posts

245 months

Thursday 28th February 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
CANBERRA PR9 EMERGENCY INTER-CREW COMMUNICATION
20th CENTURY TECHNOLOGY
Love stuff like that. Thanks for posting.
thumbup

They have a Canberra cockpit at Elvington and my son used to love climbing into the nose. It was cosy in there!

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED