M1 Lorry crash

Author
Discussion

4x4Tyke

Original Poster:

6,506 posts

132 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all

David Wagstaff admitted eight counts causing death by careless driving but cleared of dangerous driving. Given the minibus was stationary with hazards lit, I think he's got off lightly.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-43320649


The original thread is locked.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

Vipers

32,883 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
New said Wagstaff had been on a hands free phone for over an HOUR.


4x4Tyke

Original Poster:

6,506 posts

132 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
... and made no attempt to brake or swerve.

CoupeTeddy

142 posts

98 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
Max sentence for Death by Careless is 5 years, could that be 5 years for each and could they be consecutive? I know it's unlikely but is it possible?

poo at Paul's

14,147 posts

175 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
,....and on Cruise.....

Sadly the roads are full of inattentive drivers, however, with the hours, speeds and nature of roads that they do most miles on, I suspect the levels of attentiveness amongst wagon drivers is lower than it is for car drivers.


Having watched the horrific cctv of the incident though, why on earth was the taxi stopped behind the truck blocking lane one? Did he think it was stationary traffic, surely not. BBC said court heard he was trying to get out into the middle lane to pass, but having ended up stationary, maybe through getting a surpise that a stationary truck is there, I cannot help thinking i'd be up the hard shoulder and out the way PDQ if it were me.

I urge anyone who encounters some form of accident on any road, to, if possible, get well out the way or in front of it on a multi lane road eg DC or mway. You're less likely to get caught up in the aftermath if you can get in front before stopping to help etc. or dirve up the flipping batter if you need to!
Horrendous way to go, poor buggers

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

117 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
CoupeTeddy said:
Max sentence for Death by Careless is 5 years, could that be 5 years for each and could they be consecutive? I know it's unlikely but is it possible?
He could get a maximum of one third off, for the guilty plea.

grumpy52

5,582 posts

166 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
,....and on Cruise.....

Sadly the roads are full of inattentive drivers, however, with the hours, speeds and nature of roads that they do most miles on, I suspect the levels of attentiveness amongst wagon drivers is lower than it is for car drivers.
If wagon drivers were anywhere near as inattentive as car or van drivers it would be carnage out on the roads .
Unfortunately when a wagon driver does get it wrong it is normally pretty horrific .
Most trips for me in the UK especially would result in me having to take avioding action several times per day , usually involving errant cars or vans , very occasionally would it be another wagon/bus or coach .


Gecko1978

9,708 posts

157 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
Sad as it is sounds a fair result for Waggstaff. Under current rules he was careless i.e. did not react in time as not paying attention but up untill that point he was not breaking the law despite being on the phone. Hands free etc sees traffic ahead assumes its moving an to late crashes into the van. I would assume there was evidence to show he breaked but too late. The other lorry driver was at fault way over drink drive limit an wothoutna valid license stopped on the main carriage way. So my guess Waggstaff gets 3 years so does 18mths and other driver gets close to maximum for death by dangerouse driving.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
What’s the likely punishment for death by dangerous driving?

JD

2,774 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
It's a great shame that the technology exists to prevent exactly this crash, seems crazy that it isn't compulsory on HGV's let alone passenger cars.


milkround

1,118 posts

79 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
JD said:
It's a great shame that the technology exists to prevent exactly this crash, seems crazy that it isn't compulsory on HGV's let alone passenger cars.
If you are talking about adaptive cruise then it works some of the time. However it has its own problems.

anxious_ant

2,626 posts

79 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
milkround said:
JD said:
It's a great shame that the technology exists to prevent exactly this crash, seems crazy that it isn't compulsory on HGV's let alone passenger cars.
If you are talking about adaptive cruise then it works some of the time. However it has its own problems.
Autonomous braking.

Vipers

32,883 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
anxious_ant said:
milkround said:
JD said:
It's a great shame that the technology exists to prevent exactly this crash, seems crazy that it isn't compulsory on HGV's let alone passenger cars.
If you are talking about adaptive cruise then it works some of the time. However it has its own problems.
Autonomous braking.
There's evidence also that hands free is a distraction as well, but not illegal, at the moment.

Slightly off topic but a car behind me in stop start traffic was looking down as soon as she moved, and at times whilst she was moving. (Today), I finally stopped, went up to her and told her to put the bloody phone away and watch the car in front, said it's mine and if I braked quickly you may hit me.

Camelot1971

2,699 posts

166 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
This video never ceases to amaze me how good truck brakes can be (if the driver is paying attention!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI9EIjUx20I

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
4x4Tyke said:
We need a shift from blanket speed cameras to dedicated traffic police.


Edited by 4x4Tyke on Wednesday 7th March 20:21
Won't ever happen.

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
av185 said:
4x4Tyke said:
We need a shift from blanket speed cameras to dedicated traffic police.


Edited by 4x4Tyke on Wednesday 7th March 20:21
Won't ever happen.
How would "dedicated traffic police" have prevented this crash?



funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
Camelot1971 said:
This video never ceases to amaze me how good truck brakes can be (if the driver is paying attention!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI9EIjUx20I
I'm probably wrong, but isn't that an automatic braking system?

4x4Tyke

Original Poster:

6,506 posts

132 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
av185 said:
4x4Tyke said:
We need a shift from blanket speed cameras to dedicated traffic police.
Won't ever happen.
How would "dedicated traffic police" have prevented this crash?
This didn't happen in isolation.

AIH I removed that post to avoid this kind drift off topic.

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
I see. You posted a statement on the topic, about how the accident could have been prevented, but then decided that was off-topic?

Got you.

Dynamic Space Wizard

928 posts

104 months

Wednesday 7th March 2018
quotequote all
He's really lucky that the minibus was there for him to smash into, because if it hadn't been there, he'd have smacked straight into the back of the other lorry, and he wouldn't have got off so lightly then, he'd have got what he deserved.