iHalal food - what if you are against it?

iHalal food - what if you are against it?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Ry_B

Original Poster:

2,256 posts

202 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
At my workplace, due to it being in the centre of Birmingham, the catene serves only Halal meat. No none Halal meat. The work place is divided into approx 75% Muslim and 25% other religion, so I can understand their reasoning behind it. But I can't help but imagine if it was the other way round, and they sold only normal food that hadn't been prayed upon and killed in a certain way the commotion that would be caused?

I don't eat the Halal meat out of principal, not because I am religious, but I don't agree with it. How is it fair that there is no none Halal meat option?

nonplussed

3,338 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Disappointing. I thought this was going to be about a new iPhone app.

Mobile Chicane

20,845 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?

Darth Paul

1,652 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Go on I'll bite! Our canteen serves non-halal meat (I.e. Pork, cheap Chicken, etc) and my Muslim colleagues just have the fish or go vegi. We have many of these discussions in our office as non of us are hung up on pc hand wringing, so feel comfortable arguing / ripping the piss out of each other. I agree with you in that I avoid Halal meat if I can due to not agreeing with the ethics (the principle behind it is good, but that's another story!) Anyway, simple solution, don't eat in the canteen, bring in your own food! Think of all the lovely meats you can have, Rabbit, Venison, Pigeon, Osterich, hmmm!

ShadownINja

76,408 posts

283 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
As someone who doesn't care, why do you object to it? Does it taste funny?

nonplussed said:
Disappointing. I thought this was going to be about a new iPhone app.
hehe

Murph7355

37,762 posts

257 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Probably one for the politics section rather than food smile

I can understand why some wouldn't be up for eating halal meat. Or at least, as much as I can those who won't eat other odds and ends for their various reasons.

Personally, I think this is a prime example of where "the law" should keep it's schneb out. To my knowledge, employers aren't obliged to provide food for workers. What they do provide should be up to them. Workers (of any persuasion) always have the option of eating out or bringing their own food in after all.

We have far too many "considerations" IMO, so much so that it's counterproductive to an "integrated" community in many respects.

staceyb

7,107 posts

225 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because the way Halal meat is slaughtered isn't particularly humane and I would rather eat meat that had been killed in a humane way.

Simpo Two

85,573 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Ry_B said:
The work place is divided into approx 75% Muslim and 25% other religion
That makes you an ethnic minority - you should have a field day!

(but hey, guess what, it doesn't work both ways, and you're not allowed to be 'offended')

Roger645

1,728 posts

248 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Mods, back to the lounge with this one....rolleyes

Marquis_Rex

7,377 posts

240 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because it's inhumane and barbaric?

Just a guess......

Mobile Chicane

20,845 posts

213 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Marquis_Rex said:
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because it's inhumane and barbaric?

Just a guess......
Why do you say that?

Halal slaughtering guidelines here

In particular...

"...The animal has to be fed as normal and given water prior to slaughter, one animal must not see the other being slaughtered..."

How many 'non-halal' slaughterhouses can claim that?



Edited by Mobile Chicane on Tuesday 24th November 22:23

bonsai

2,015 posts

181 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Ry_B - how does it feel to be a minority?

Ninjaboy

2,525 posts

251 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
Marquis_Rex said:
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because it's inhumane and barbaric?

Just a guess......
Why do you say that?

Halal slaughtering guidelines here

In particular...

"...The animal has to be fed as normal and given water prior to slaughter, one animal must not see the other being slaughtered..."

How many 'non-halal' slaughterhouses can claim that?



Edited by Mobile Chicane on Tuesday 24th November 22:23
I don't give a toss what the guide lines say, which is more humanane? a bolt through the head and instant death or having your throat cut and bleed to death?

the OP has every right to object and i would'nt want to eat halal meat.

Edited by Ninjaboy on Tuesday 24th November 22:58

Roger645

1,728 posts

248 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Ninjaboy said:
Mobile Chicane said:
Marquis_Rex said:
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because it's inhumane and barbaric?

Just a guess......
Why do you say that?

Halal slaughtering guidelines here

In particular...

"...The animal has to be fed as normal and given water prior to slaughter, one animal must not see the other being slaughtered..."

How many 'non-halal' slaughterhouses can claim that?



Edited by Mobile Chicane on Tuesday 24th November 22:23
I don't give a toss what the guide lines say, which is more humanane? bolt through the head and instant death or having your throat cut and bleed to death?

the OP has every right to object and i would'nt want to eat halal meat.
Bolt guns don't kill, they stun. Animals are then typically bled or if in the field a small stick is inserted in the bolt hole to scramble the brains.

Ninjaboy

2,525 posts

251 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Roger645 said:
Ninjaboy said:
Mobile Chicane said:
Marquis_Rex said:
Mobile Chicane said:
The manner of the killing evidently bothers those of a religious persuasion, but if you don't share their beliefs, why should it bother you?
Because it's inhumane and barbaric?

Just a guess......
Why do you say that?

Halal slaughtering guidelines here

In particular...

"...The animal has to be fed as normal and given water prior to slaughter, one animal must not see the other being slaughtered..."

How many 'non-halal' slaughterhouses can claim that?



Edited by Mobile Chicane on Tuesday 24th November 22:23
I don't give a toss what the guide lines say, which is more humanane? bolt through the head and instant death or having your throat cut and bleed to death?

the OP has every right to object and i would'nt want to eat halal meat.
Bolt guns don't kill, they stun. Animals are then typically bled or if in the field a small stick is inserted in the bolt hole to scramble the brains.
If the animal is stunned it isnt awake as it dies, that the point i'm trying to make.

Edited by Ninjaboy on Tuesday 24th November 23:07

grumbledoak

31,551 posts

234 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Roger645 said:
Bolt guns don't kill, they stun. Animals are then typically bled...
They are still not conscious as they bleed out. As far as we can tell, it is better. As a supposedly humane first world nation we should insist on it. It's not like the Halal rules forbid stunning - they are largely concerned with the animal's welfare.

Roger645

1,728 posts

248 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Roger645 said:
Bolt guns don't kill, they stun. Animals are then typically bled...
They are still not conscious as they bleed out. As far as we can tell, it is better. As a supposedly humane first world nation we should insist on it. It's not like the Halal rules forbid stunning - they are largely concerned with the animal's welfare.
A friend who runs a slaughterhouse supplies sheep for some moslem festivals and he stuns them then the holy bloke slits the throat.

Bolt Gunning some larger animals will not render them unconscious but it is thought that they do not suffer whilst being bled out.

grumbledoak

31,551 posts

234 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Roger645 said:
A friend who runs a slaughterhouse supplies sheep for some moslem festivals and he stuns them then the holy bloke slits the throat.
yes Our laws in this respect are compatible.

XJSJohn

15,966 posts

220 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Most meat killes "halal style" is stunned first similar to with th ebolt gun in a muslim slaughter house.

Out here most every place you go to has a Halal option / stall / menu but with lots of chinese too there is also a lot of pork products! you just make your choice. They even divide out the cuttlery!! Share and share alike


although last year someone did have a whole batch of stickers made up with the Halal council logo on them and a government thingy saying "new Halal Pork" then stuck them on every pork product they could find in NTUC Fairprice (equiv of Asda)

Its amazing how many Muslims actually believed this!! Caused a bit of a scandle!!

Glassman

22,558 posts

216 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
If I see 'Halal' I walk past and go somewhere where they serve bacon.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED