Lets look at our guitars thread

Lets look at our guitars thread

Author
Discussion

chemistry

2,158 posts

110 months

Friday 13th November 2020
quotequote all
sutoka said:
Had this Hofner Senator for a few years now. I think it's around 1958 and not it the greatest condition, it's had a hard life.

Not the easiest or most comfortable of guitars to play but it sits in the corner looking pretty.



Very cool.

gazza285

9,823 posts

209 months

Saturday 14th November 2020
quotequote all
chemistry said:
sutoka said:
Had this Hofner Senator for a few years now. I think it's around 1958 and not it the greatest condition, it's had a hard life.

Not the easiest or most comfortable of guitars to play but it sits in the corner looking pretty.



Very cool.
Indeed. I have a '62 Senator and a '63 Congress, strung with my usual electric guage strings, and they are great to play. Low action, nice fretboard radius, and slim truss rod necks, they feel very similar to my favourite Gibsons.

If you want a nice playing vintage Hofner, I would look for one with a truss rod, so something '60 onwards. Cheap and great to play.

Grrbang

728 posts

72 months

Saturday 14th November 2020
quotequote all
Tom1312 said:
Any electrical gurus here? I used to be fairly handy but haven't a clue with amps...

Found an ENGL Thunder on eBay sold as for parts and not working, almost seems too good to be true so will probably give it a miss, as you can see below, this is what the seller said happened... Whether true or not, could be a simple fix such as dodgy fuse or bottomless pit?

Opinions?
It's likely that the fuse is a symptom of another failed component. An amp tech should be able to quickly find the cause with a probe. Fortunately, most components which fail in amps are generic and inexpensive, unless it's the mains or output transformer which generally cost £100-150 for the part.

In terms of labour costs, amp techs have quite low hourly rates. Looking at the ENGL thunder PCB on google, it's a very tidy and simple circuit, nothing like a 3-channel Mesa.

So if a working Thunder is worth £450, I might offer about £100-150 at the most. If the problem turns out to be simple (most common), you would have got it half price. If it's a transformer, you'll end up having spent no more than market value.

languagetimothy

1,094 posts

163 months

Saturday 14th November 2020
quotequote all
Grrbang said:
Tom1312 said:
Any electrical gurus here? I used to be fairly handy but haven't a clue with amps...

Found an ENGL Thunder on eBay sold as for parts and not working, almost seems too good to be true so will probably give it a miss, as you can see below, this is what the seller said happened... Whether true or not, could be a simple fix such as dodgy fuse or bottomless pit?

Opinions?
It's likely that the fuse is a symptom of another failed component. An amp tech should be able to quickly find the cause with a probe. Fortunately, most components which fail in amps are generic and inexpensive, unless it's the mains or output transformer which generally cost £100-150 for the part.

In terms of labour costs, amp techs have quite low hourly rates. Looking at the ENGL thunder PCB on google, it's a very tidy and simple circuit, nothing like a 3-channel Mesa.

So if a working Thunder is worth £450, I might offer about £100-150 at the most. If the problem turns out to be simple (most common), you would have got it half price. If it's a transformer, you'll end up having spent no more than market value.
This. I had a Marshall 50w 2x12 valve combo for the 70s that I'd had for many years but stopped using it when some smoke appeared! It had sat at the back of the spare room for 25 years and I decided to see if it could be fixed. Took it to a recommended amp tech. New valves and transformer plus a general clean up cost me about 170 quid. Sounded fantastic, but I was used to using Fender twin by then which I preferred. Sold it for 900.



baptistsan

1,839 posts

211 months

Sunday 15th November 2020
quotequote all
On the subject of amps; anyone heard the new Laney Cub Super 12?

Grrbang

728 posts

72 months

Monday 16th November 2020
quotequote all
baptistsan said:
On the subject of amps; anyone heard the new Laney Cub Super 12?
Sounds fantastic on the Guitarist demo, and looks to be great value. HOWEVER, theirs is mic'ed up which will make a big difference for this small combo.

I have the high-gain Iommi TI-15 combo with the same speaker, same valves, same size enclosure and 15W/1W inputs. The difference is that mine is a high-gain amp and is marketed as a practice amp.

I think a 1W input on the Cub is a great idea, because power tube saturation is so important for boutique tones. As it's not a class A amp, you may even find saturation possible in 12W mode without your teeth rattling.

However, the speaker/enclosure is fine for practice but is NOT professional sounding or room-filling in any way. It's a cheap speaker as you'd expect at this price point. Stuffing all 12 inches of it into such a small enclosure damps out the bass and overall projection, giving less of the versatility that you would expect from a boutique studio amp. My TI-15 very much sounds like a point source of sound rather than a full sound. The small enclosure also means that a speaker upgrade would not solve all the problems.

If you want the sound actually hitting your ears to be 'boutique', I recommend looking at the Cub head, and plugging into a separate high quality cabinet. I would recommend an open back cab (preferably birch ply) with a 1x12 Celestion Vintage 30. I have this cab and my TI-15 sounds much better through it.

Don1

15,950 posts

209 months

Monday 16th November 2020
quotequote all
Don't think I shared my most recent addition. A cheap SA series Ibanex. Plays nicely.

baptistsan

1,839 posts

211 months

Monday 16th November 2020
quotequote all
Grrbang said:
Sounds fantastic on the Guitarist demo, and looks to be great value. HOWEVER, theirs is mic'ed up which will make a big difference for this small combo.

I have the high-gain Iommi TI-15 combo with the same speaker, same valves, same size enclosure and 15W/1W inputs. The difference is that mine is a high-gain amp and is marketed as a practice amp.

I think a 1W input on the Cub is a great idea, because power tube saturation is so important for boutique tones. As it's not a class A amp, you may even find saturation possible in 12W mode without your teeth rattling.

However, the speaker/enclosure is fine for practice but is NOT professional sounding or room-filling in any way. It's a cheap speaker as you'd expect at this price point. Stuffing all 12 inches of it into such a small enclosure damps out the bass and overall projection, giving less of the versatility that you would expect from a boutique studio amp. My TI-15 very much sounds like a point source of sound rather than a full sound. The small enclosure also means that a speaker upgrade would not solve all the problems.

If you want the sound actually hitting your ears to be 'boutique', I recommend looking at the Cub head, and plugging into a separate high quality cabinet. I would recommend an open back cab (preferably birch ply) with a 1x12 Celestion Vintage 30. I have this cab and my TI-15 sounds much better through it.
Thank you for the detailed reply, it's appreciated.

Going to try one out once we can hit the shops again.

A buddy has the Bass breaker 007 limited edition & it sounds rather lovely. If I can get similar sounds then I'd be happy!

NDA

21,598 posts

226 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Don1 said:
Don't think I shared my most recent addition. A cheap SA series Ibanex. Plays nicely.
That looks lovely....

Dumb question time - I don't own any guitars, I'm not a guitarist. But my son is, so I'm developing an interest... but only looking at them.

Why are the pickups, in some guitars, like yours, covered?

Don1

15,950 posts

209 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Just design of them - these ones have an ability to be switched, so effectively they become a single pickup instead of a double (humbucker), but the solid top doesn't have any real meaning.

Some people say they affect the tone, I say go with what you like the look of.

My all time favourites are the burnt chrome ones...

Stratovarious

7,730 posts

179 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Removing pickup covers first became a 'thing' in the mid-70s, possibly because that's when the fad for hot replacement pickups started, and many of them came without covers. People have always argued about whether or not it affects the sound, and if so whether it makes it better or worse.

I don't like it because it makes the guitar look scruffy, like a hot rod with a missing bonnet lid. I only have one guitar without covers; if I were keeping it, I'd have fitted a pair by now.

NDA

21,598 posts

226 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Most guitars come without covers as standard though don't they?

Don1

15,950 posts

209 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Depends on the guitar/style.

This is my first Ibanez with covers.... The new PIAs have covers on them.

Bobajobbob

1,442 posts

97 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
My Japanese Strat and Epiphone SG. Currently waiting on a Vintage Les Paul copy which a friend convinced me to buy over a real Les Paul. Apparently bang for buck of Vintage guitars is excellent although I had never heard of them. I should find out tomorrow.

I've also just pulled the trigger on a Positive Grid Spark amp so would be interested in what Pistonheads thinks about that?


baptistsan

1,839 posts

211 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Same buddy with the Bassbreaker also has a Spark. Took an age to come.

Just be aware that the millions of tones available are quite varied in quality. Anyone can upload a setting to the website.

He likes to fiddle with it but always ends up going back to the Fender!

Bobajobbob

1,442 posts

97 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Cheers I suspect I'll set up a few classic tones and then stop fiddling. It will just be good to not have to dig our my pedal board every time I want to play.

Stratovarious

7,730 posts

179 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Bobajobbob said:
... Apparently bang for buck of Vintage guitars is excellent although I had never heard of them ...
I have a Vintage V60 which is a copy of a Flying V and love it. First time I changed strings, I couldn't resist popping the scratchplate for a look under the hood. Disappointed to see the mini-pots, but pleasantly surprised when I noticed the 4-conductor pickups!

Stan the Bat

8,932 posts

213 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Stratovarious said:
Removing pickup covers first became a 'thing' in the mid-70s, possibly because that's when the fad for hot replacement pickups started, and many of them came without covers. People have always argued about whether or not it affects the sound, and if so whether it makes it better or worse.

I don't like it because it makes the guitar look scruffy, like a hot rod with a missing bonnet lid. I only have one guitar without covers; if I were keeping it, I'd have fitted a pair by now.
We are all different, I like the uncovered look.

Bobajobbob

1,442 posts

97 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Stratovarious said:
I have a Vintage V60 which is a copy of a Flying V and love it. First time I changed strings, I couldn't resist popping the scratchplate for a look under the hood. Disappointed to see the mini-pots, but pleasantly surprised when I noticed the 4-conductor pickups!
I honestly had never heard of the brand and had always looked down on copies including my Epiphone SG which is a pretty shoddy playing guitar but a friend of mine who knows and cares a lot more about guitars than I do swears by them. I’m pretty damm excited about it turning up now!

wombleh

1,794 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th November 2020
quotequote all
Bobajobbob said:
I've also just pulled the trigger on a Positive Grid Spark amp so would be interested in what Pistonheads thinks about that?
Guitarist in the band I'm in has one and said it's all the practice amp he's ever likely to need at home.

I was tempted but got a 1W marshall DSL instead, which is surprisingly loud!