No wheels off...

Author
Discussion

BaronVonVaderham

2,317 posts

148 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Maybe Palmer is planning on turning his circuits into golf courses?

andy97

4,704 posts

223 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
woof said:
I was at Snetterton last weekend and they had the sprinklers on, on a small patch of grass in the paddock. Nuff said.

If you are that far off the circuit you really are in trouble!!!!!

pistolp

1,719 posts

223 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
I have to say I am in support of it now. Which I never expected. Its a relief to have clearly defined track limits.

What clubs really need is a decent clerk of the course so that the enforcement of the rule and any penalties doesn't become too officious. But generally I support the rule, some people were cheating and I'm glad it's now the same for everyone. At the end of the day it isn't that hard to stay within the limits so everyone should just accept it or quit racing I guess?

terenceb

1,488 posts

172 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
woof said:
Laughable.

Well I've decided to make my feelings known by cancelling all my testing at MSV circuits this year. That's about £1500 worth. It's a shame there isn't a drivers association that could stand up for what drivers want, rather than one persons OCD about his grass.

fk MSV and fk Palmer
So the loss of your 1500 quid will make a difference?
Come test at the Nordschleife, 150 kerbs and only about three you could use.



pistolp

1,719 posts

223 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
BaronVonVaderham said:
Maybe Palmer is planning on turning his circuits into golf courses?
I'd be nervous playing on one of his courses. Imagine the penalties for divets.....

woof

8,456 posts

278 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
BaronVonVaderham said:
Maybe Palmer is planning on turning his circuits into golf courses?
Probably more money in it for him wink

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

165 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Woof
Do you really not remember how poor the circuits used to look in the octagon days and before?
Or how poor the toilets were or how the meat was all cheap cuts in the cafes?
What is wrong with a quality environment around the site? These are now major international sporting venues not just dusty old holes any more.
MSV still has on going improvements at all circuits but I`m sure you wont be happy with that either . Brands could have become a housing estate and a golf course many years ago and it didn't because of the vision and focus that has been bought to bear by a company that is centred on motor sport and delivers some of the best driving experiences on 2 and 4 wheels.
They also sell teddy bears in the shops should you want one!

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
mad4amanda said:
They also sell teddy bears in the shops should you want one!
You're offering to sell him the toys, that he'll need, in order to throw them out of the pram?

That's a keen business acumen at work there. hehe

pistolp

1,719 posts

223 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Guys no one can deny what JPalmer has done with MSV. Its on the whole improved Motorsport no end. And Amanda is right, they were generally all **** holes before! We can't have it all.

It really is as it says on the tin, motorsportvision.

andy97

4,704 posts

223 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
It is certainly true that in the Octagon era the circuits were in poor shape. It is also true that many track day and race participants have higher than average disposable income so they tend to expect reasonable standards for their pounds.

It is also true that Motorsport is very time consuming and for many of us to continue we have to take our families with us. I may put up with grotty loos and dodgy burger bars but my wife won't. Unhappy wives are not compatible with racing!

Palmer realises that his business depends on increased participation in the corporate, track day and race world and that means increasing standards. It's a competitive market and Presentation standards in many sports have improved and to get repeat business motor sport also needs to improve.

Palmer has successfully improved the look of his circuits and the quality of the loos and catering etc and fair play to him for that. In other threads people have moaned about the "look" of Donington but they are playing catch up because they know that they have to match the MSV standards, even if it takes time. You can't have it both ways.

Motorsport is an entertainment business and people who start to feel taken advantage off will go and do something else. The presentation aspects of circuits therefore does matter. Motorsport isn't just about the Tarmac, it's about the whole experience.

JM, you are in the web design business. You can put information across in a basic way or in an enhanced and appealing way. Presumably you do the latter because that gives the client what they want and gets you repeat business. Same principle really. JP wants the whole experience to be appealing to all because that gives his customers the best value in the end and gives him the best return in his investment.

Just my 2 penny worth and not really to do with track limits but I think it's all related, along with the motor cycle racers concerns over safety at the track edges.

Edited by andy97 on Saturday 26th April 21:39


Edited by andy97 on Saturday 26th April 21:46

woof

8,456 posts

278 months

Sunday 27th April 2014
quotequote all
But we're not talking about toilets are we - we're talking about his bloody grass on a few corners at his circuits.
BTW The suites at Brands are in a shocking state.




Dave Stewart

43 posts

149 months

Sunday 27th April 2014
quotequote all
I did a short article about the standards of circuits last year. I don't know how to upload it here, but it is available here:- http://thundersportgb.com/index.php/downloads/cat_... as article number 80 "Raising the Bar".

Before anyone insinuates that I have an affiliation to MSV or JP, you should maybe look at who I am and ask around in the bike world. JP and I have had a fair few reasonably colourful differences of opinion. I am one of the few organisers that hire his venues who is genuinely not intimidated or concerned about offending him. Many say they are not afraid, but just watch them wilt when they are in the same meeting room.

I happen to agree with 95% of what Mad4Amanda (spelling)has said in the course of this thread and the fact that he/she obviously has some connection with MSV does not invalidate the accuracy of those statements.

One thing I would say though is that the much maligned Octagon Group did actually pay for a lot of infrastructure upgrades at the venues before they departed (Snetterton garages, Cadwell Park pit area, Oulton Park pit complex). JPs skill has been in applying the finishing touches and making sure that the end job is made the best it can possibly be. He is a man with an incredible eye for detail and an almost obsessive determination to see his ideas completed to his own high standards.

Anyway, have a read or if someone is able to get the article directly embedded here, feel free.

Boxster66

61 posts

125 months

Sunday 27th April 2014
quotequote all
I dislike what MSV have done to circuits, I prefered each circuit to be individual and diffrer from each other as it makes each event a different experience, not just a barrage of red signs and the same over priced food on offer at every track. Just back from Castle Combe they have it spot on I think. I wish we could get away from the corporate take over of our tracks and get back to the caravan cafe at Lyden Hill and the old dears seriving at Mallory.....

BertBert

Original Poster:

19,109 posts

212 months

Sunday 27th April 2014
quotequote all
nooooooo, you don't understand the vision of the great Lord Palmer. Our places of racing should be places of beauty and tranquility. All beautifully ordered and not a blade of grass out of place.

FFS get a grip guys. We are there to go racing. If it needs to be that pristine, create proper runoffs like we see at proper circuits. If it's grass, it'll get eaten up.

Words fail me.
Or maybe they don't.

Bert

Maxx

356 posts

260 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
andy97 said:
If you are that far off the circuit you really are in trouble!!!!!
I have to say I rolled around on the floor laughing at that one, thanks Andy smile

woof

8,456 posts

278 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
This is from last weeks test at Brands Hatch.
I forgot to mention that the track had been covered in oil from a Ferrari 360 that had dumped it's sump across half the track. This is my 3rd lap - so still building heat up into the slicks

I turn in, get a little bit of oversteer and I correct it and run a little wide. That earned me a black flag on a test day. Who in their right mind thinks that's correct ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-5laJXz9Ys



roddo

570 posts

196 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
We max5 racing have just had a weekend at Anglesey, I must say they were VERY fair.......

I had all wheels off (mistake) no penalty. I also used curbs without any problem.

But I'm dreading our next round at a msv circuit.

BertBert

Original Poster:

19,109 posts

212 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
roddo said:
We max5 racing have just had a weekend at Anglesey, I must say they were VERY fair.......

I had all wheels off (mistake) no penalty. I also used curbs without any problem.

But I'm dreading our next round at a msv circuit.
I think you are actually allowed to use the curbs!

Altrezia

8,517 posts

212 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
You are - you can use the white line and kerb, whichever is further out. You just can't go over them.

I don't care for grass, but I don't really see the problem with the rule either.

BertBert

Original Poster:

19,109 posts

212 months

Monday 28th April 2014
quotequote all
Altrezia said:
but I don't really see the problem with the rule either.
Well without re-hashing the whole zillion pages of the thread, there wasn't much wrong with the old rule, so no need for a pesky new rule biggrin