Additional Throttle return Springs???

Additional Throttle return Springs???

Author
Discussion

NTEL

Original Poster:

5,051 posts

241 months

Sunday 31st May 2009
quotequote all
Just fitted three Weber DCNF carbs to the race car. These are each complete with a throttle return spring on a common linkage. Is there still a requirement to fit an additional spring as per the blue book?

Carnage

886 posts

233 months

Sunday 31st May 2009
quotequote all
I have twin Weber 48's on mine, set out as you describe. Never had any bother.

GreenV8S

30,254 posts

285 months

Sunday 31st May 2009
quotequote all
If you were to snip one of the springs, do all the throttles still close? If not, I'd expect a scrute to demand the extra spring.

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
The extra spring needs to be fitted on the link, surely; as opposed to on each individual throttle? Id still expect to have to fit this even if the other remaining return springs provided a degree of redundancy.

dgb00

147 posts

271 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Yep, you will. The scrutineers will pick it up and bk you for it. I've had long lectures about it in the past, along with threatens to not pass the car. Better to take the trouble and fit them, and it is a safety issue.

NTEL

Original Poster:

5,051 posts

241 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the advice chaps. Looks like I'll have to devise a way of doing it. smile (although, I did disconnect two of the three integral springs and one spring does operate all three carbs easily, so i suppose its a belt and braces job really)

carl_w

9,231 posts

259 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
Presumably this doesn't apply for those of us with fly-by-wire throttles? I assume mine's just a rheostat.

mat205125

17,790 posts

214 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
If you were to snip one of the springs, do all the throttles still close? If not, I'd expect a scrute to demand the extra spring.
This would be the black and white letter of the rule if the scruitineer wanted to really make a point about it.

We've had similar discussions with scrutineers in the past on twin carb setups. In that instance he let us run, however insisted that we got it sorted .... Tip: When scrutineers "let you off" like this, actually go and do what you agreed to do, and they don't forget and CAN exclude you when you roll up next time.

I'd advise just fitting a spring per carb and be done with it .... A scrutineer may even pop the bonnet and think "Excellent! He read and understood that reg to the letter", and then not feel the need to detail/double check every part of the car, rather just the essentials.

dgb00

147 posts

271 months

Thursday 4th June 2009
quotequote all
The point is that if for any reason the linkage should break, that all the carbs are still capable of closing. A pair of Webers jammed open once when I was driving (three pairs on the engine) - very interesting...

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

192 months

Thursday 4th June 2009
quotequote all
Dave two springs on the linkage is what you need as a fail safe. One is acceptable if you've kept the spindle coil springs, but its not advisable.

99hjhm

426 posts

187 months

Sunday 7th June 2009
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Dave two springs on the linkage is what you need as a fail safe. One is acceptable if you've kept the spindle coil springs, but its not advisable.
Correct.

NTEL

Original Poster:

5,051 posts

241 months

Sunday 7th June 2009
quotequote all
99hjhm said:
TVR_owner said:
Dave two springs on the linkage is what you need as a fail safe. One is acceptable if you've kept the spindle coil springs, but its not advisable.
Correct.
OK, Job sorted. I made a couple of brackets up from bits and pieces and fitted two return springs. Seems a bit of an over kill but should keep the bosses happy wink