Revenent - Was it just me?

Revenent - Was it just me?

Author
Discussion

Pan Pan Pan

Original Poster:

9,928 posts

112 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Saw this film the other day, and it was one of the better films I have seen lately, but I wondered if it was just me, or if any others had difficulty understanding what was being said (particularly by the Fitzgerald / villain) character?
Never mind 3D or all that gubbins, I could have done with sub titles to convert the `English' being spoken into something I could understand.
I realize the film went to extraordinary lengths to achieve accuracy in what it was depicting, but missing out on a lot of the dialogue, did take a bit of the shine off what was otherwise an excellent piece of work.

knk

1,269 posts

272 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Agree.
Too much mumbling.

GCH

3,993 posts

203 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I watched it last nite and thought the same - for me it was only a real problem with Tom Hardy's character, and it was definitely to the detriment of the movie and his performance.

Something went a bit wrong for it to be nominated for an oscar for best sound mixing!

Blaster72

10,880 posts

198 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Tom Hardy mumbles his way through every film he's in, not sure why they keep hiring him.


TC8

853 posts

191 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Thought it was excellent, apart from the mumbling which was almost entirely unintelligible. The only other thing that was a bit off was his ankle after the bear attack, it was sticking out at a right angle and seemed to heal itself.

TC8

853 posts

191 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Waterproof gunpowder appeared to be handy too.

phil_cardiff

7,098 posts

209 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
I agree about Fitzgerald, couldn't understand him at times.

As for the film as a whole...the only Oscar it's worthy of is best cinematography. No way is that a best movie winner, unless it's been a particularly poor year for film.

vx220

2,691 posts

235 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
Tom Hardy mumbles his way through every film he's in, not sure why they keep hiring him.
According to several female sources, he has knicker elastic snapping abilities, so acting not hugely important

Pan Pan Pan

Original Poster:

9,928 posts

112 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Not sure how anyone would know, but perhaps the mumbling speech type was used to provide an accurate reflection on how the people of that time and place actually spoke?
Given its `almost' complete non intelligibility (to me at least) some subtitles (as they used to cover the French and native Indian spoken in the film) would have been useful.

Frances The Mute

1,816 posts

242 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
True Grit was exactly the same. Sometimes, attention to detail is a bad thing.

Pan Pan Pan

Original Poster:

9,928 posts

112 months

Tuesday 16th February 2016
quotequote all
Looks like this film achieved five awards, such as best film , best actor etc, which I guess is OK but I am fairly sure it did not win one for best script / dialogue smile Anyone here know the other categories it achieved awards in?