Freeview / Freesat PVR question

Freeview / Freesat PVR question

Author
Discussion

Daveyh

Original Poster:

110 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I'd assumed these recorder store the digital data as is, however on a friend's spanking new Panny unit, there are a few quality settings... what gives?! Do they re-compress the signal?
thanks
DH

ginettag27

6,306 posts

270 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
You'd assume wrong then!

They simply record at varying levels of MPEG compression... The more the video is compressed the lower the quality...

Daveyh

Original Poster:

110 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Oh that's terrible! Is already compressed plenty IMHO - can certainly see what's going on, bandwidth-wise. Is this the same with SKY+ boxes too?

mackie1

8,153 posts

234 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
AFAIK Sky+ records the stream as-is without any transcoding.

bigdods

7,173 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
If you are using a normal CRT screen (mines 32" Widescreen which is very old hat now) then you can record at quite low quality without seeing any degredation. I use a quality setting called MN9 (no idea what this means) and can get around 140 hours of recording on my sony 80Gb PVR. I guess when I upgrade to a 42" screen I may need to up the quality a bit.

Daveyh

Original Poster:

110 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
seems daft to me... the broadcasters spend some time & effort getting a decent balance of bandwidth & quality, and deliver it as a data stream, only for the digital recorder to further scrunch it. Massive hard drives are as cheap as chips these days.

RedLeicester

6,869 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Daveyh said:
seems daft to me... the broadcasters spend some time & effort getting a decent balance of bandwidth & quality, and deliver it as a data stream, only for the digital recorder to further scrunch it. Massive hard drives are as cheap as chips these days.
Considering it's compressed to buggery before being transmitted, a little extra compression really doesn't make all that much difference....

horacethefrog

303 posts

214 months

Monday 26th January 2009
quotequote all
The Humax Foxsat HDR Freesat recorder does not compress the signal further and has no options to do so either. It's got a 320Gb disc which, IIRC, is good for 40 hours of HD (and it's relatively easy to upgrade to a bigger disk if required).

ginettag27

6,306 posts

270 months

Monday 26th January 2009
quotequote all
Daveyh said:
seems daft to me... the broadcasters spend some time & effort getting a decent balance of bandwidth & quality, and deliver it as a data stream, only for the digital recorder to further scrunch it. Massive hard drives are as cheap as chips these days.
Indeed they are cheap as, but once they're full, they're full!! Initially you always think you won't run out of space, but it soon gets gobbled up, especially if you record a series of something and a few films here and there...