Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Author
Discussion

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Thursday 7th September 2017
quotequote all
Scott suffers from Lucasese, so he simply ignored a lot of his earlier film, he likes to do that.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 7th September 2017
quotequote all
I'll do the fingering.











<snigger!>

SpudLink

5,786 posts

192 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Well, someone really loves the film.
Here he explains why it’s great and we are all wrong...
https://youtu.be/YIftf6S3hvI

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Oh ffs...he makes some good points, I'm gonna give it another shot....

also gonna watch the RLM take again and the SW film by this fella

Killer2005

19,643 posts

228 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Watched it again this week as Covenant is on Sky Cinema at the moment.

It's better than I remember than when I watched it at the cinema however still way behind the other Alien films. Granted enjoying it does mean ignoring a lot of the plot holes but once you do its watchable just not great.

Frimley111R

15,663 posts

234 months

Saturday 21st April 2018
quotequote all
Killer2005 said:
Granted enjoying it does mean ignoring a lot of the plot holes but once you do its watchable just not great.
This applies to just about every film ever made tbh.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Saturday 21st April 2018
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
Well, someone really loves the film.
Here he explains why it’s great and we are all wrong...
https://youtu.be/YIftf6S3hvI
I think some of his points are off.

He draws a parallel between the egg scene in Alien and the one in Covenant - stating that nobody complained how dumb it was when John Hurt's character looked into the egg.

The difference is - in Covenant, the crew had already been attacked, so knew weird looking organisms were potentially deadly on this planet. David had also been shown to be creepy and untrustworthy by this point and had shown an affinity/emotional connection to the creatures. The character he asked to look into the egg had just killed one of these right in front of David moments before, with David expressing extreme displeasure at this act.

I'm sorry - but the two scenes aren't at all comparable. It's what happens in the build up to these scenes that is important. John Hurt's character had zero information to go on. It was an innocent act borne out of pure ignorance. The same cannot be said of Covenant.


Patrick Bateman

12,183 posts

174 months

Saturday 21st April 2018
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
I think some of his points are off.

He draws a parallel between the egg scene in Alien and the one in Covenant - stating that nobody complained how dumb it was when John Hurt's character looked into the egg.

The difference is - in Covenant, the crew had already been attacked, so knew weird looking organisms were potentially deadly on this planet. David had also been shown to be creepy and untrustworthy by this point and had shown an affinity/emotional connection to the creatures. The character he asked to look into the egg had just killed one of these right in front of David moments before, with David expressing extreme displeasure at this act.

I'm sorry - but the two scenes aren't at all comparable. It's what happens in the build up to these scenes that is important. John Hurt's character had zero information to go on. It was an innocent act borne out of pure ignorance. The same cannot be said of Covenant.
I'd have thought that was quite obvious as well.

The bit I don't understand is how the director thinks it's fine.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Saturday 21st April 2018
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
I think some of his points are off.

He draws a parallel between the egg scene in Alien and the one in Covenant - stating that nobody complained how dumb it was when John Hurt's character looked into the egg.

The difference is - in Covenant, the crew had already been attacked, so knew weird looking organisms were potentially deadly on this planet. David had also been shown to be creepy and untrustworthy by this point and had shown an affinity/emotional connection to the creatures. The character he asked to look into the egg had just killed one of these right in front of David moments before, with David expressing extreme displeasure at this act.

I'm sorry - but the two scenes aren't at all comparable. It's what happens in the build up to these scenes that is important. John Hurt's character had zero information to go on. It was an innocent act borne out of pure ignorance. The same cannot be said of Covenant.
I've watched some of his other vids...I think he's a tad disingenuous or just not that good at understanding differences. Or he just wants to be different to attract viewers. He's OK, but RLM, Georg and Rossatron will remain my main go to's.

JagLover

42,416 posts

235 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Finally got around to watching it and it was fairly rubbish.

Many have talked about basic problems with the world building, the plot and how it matches with the Lore and all are correct. IMO a bigger issue than all of that is just no proper characterisation. Someone said that this should have been called David: Covenant and he was the only character in the movie virtually all the rest were just horror movie cyphers who we were waiting for to die in various spectacular ways.

It is writing 101. If you have interesting characters, and interesting plot arcs for those characters, you can make good movies with virtually any subject matter in any genre.

As with many recent Hollywood blockbusters the writing comes a long way down the list in terms of importance.

As for Ridley Scott. If you give him a good script he is capable of directing a great movie. If he has a bad script he directs a bad movie. He isn't the visionary director you would want to create a new franchise.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
Time to re-evaluate Promethus? jester

also that parick allen fella... laugh he has a video out about we all should ignore plot holes, he's a muppet/shill/moron/instigator...delete as appropriate. biggrin

Narcisus

8,074 posts

280 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
Ok.... yeah its still crap biggrin

robemcdonald

8,787 posts

196 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
Whenever I stumble upon it on TV I feel myself compelled to watch it (regardless of what stage of the film it is). I know it’s utter rubbish, but I find oddly irresistible.

Very strange.

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Whenever I stumble upon it on TV I feel myself compelled to watch it (regardless of what stage of the film it is). I know it’s utter rubbish, but I find oddly irresistible.

Very strange.
I think it's the fantastic visuals rather than story that compels us to re-watch...

Durzel

12,270 posts

168 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
Yeah, you can't really argue with Ridley's world building abilities.

My pet peeve with Prometheus is the the tech looks far more advanced than Alien, even though it's a prequel. I guess it's not a massive gripe, and I know Ridley can't help himself, but still..

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
chris watton said:
robemcdonald said:
Whenever I stumble upon it on TV I feel myself compelled to watch it (regardless of what stage of the film it is). I know it’s utter rubbish, but I find oddly irresistible.

Very strange.
I think it's the fantastic visuals rather than story that compels us to re-watch...
This, plus an inner feeling that maybe it will be better this one last time smile

RBH58

969 posts

135 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
It’s not part of the canon IMHO. Ridley disrespected his own legacy with that Prometheus rubbish. Prequel/Sequel/Schmequel.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
The perfect trilogy was squandered way back.

alien - 1 v 8
aliens - nest v colony
alien³ - should have been aliens v earth, a bit like what the end of ALien:resurrection promised, the threat that they land on earth in an apocalyptic/doomsday/28 months later scenario.
I recall reading one of the comics where the SJs come to earth and there is tension, the president goes and meets with SJ leader and he is infected with an alien because SJs are pathologically terrified of them and terrans are just so feeble military speaking in comparison to the SJs. Damn good story.

I had my own idea that there was an alien homeworld, with an 'emperor' alien at the heart of it (similar to Arachnophobia) and that this was the spawn of all aliens. My ideas way back when were much better than the utter fking drivel hollywood crimped out.

otolith

56,135 posts

204 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
Durzel said:
My pet peeve with Prometheus is the the tech looks far more advanced than Alien, even though it's a prequel. I guess it's not a massive gripe, and I know Ridley can't help himself, but still..
It does, but then maybe that's like comparing Elon Musk's private yacht to some commercial freighter shipping ore around the world.

Guvernator

13,156 posts

165 months

Monday 24th September 2018
quotequote all
Halb said:
The perfect trilogy was squandered way back.

alien - 1 v 8
aliens - nest v colony
alien³ - should have been aliens v earth, a bit like what the end of ALien:resurrection promised, the threat that they land on earth in an apocalyptic/doomsday/28 months later scenario.
I recall reading one of the comics where the SJs come to earth and there is tension, the president goes and meets with SJ leader and he is infected with an alien because SJs are pathologically terrified of them and terrans are just so feeble military speaking in comparison to the SJs. Damn good story.

I had my own idea that there was an alien homeworld, with an 'emperor' alien at the heart of it (similar to Arachnophobia) and that this was the spawn of all aliens. My ideas way back when were much better than the utter fking drivel hollywood crimped out.
Agree with this completely. The escalation in the first 2 was excellent, it should have naturally progressed to all out war in the third. Some of the comic storylines even went down the war route and they do find a Queen of all Queens or some such in the end IIRC. No idea why they didn't just tidy that up and film that. Instead we got lumped with a turgid retread of Alien, I know Alien 3 has it fans but I'm not one of them and the less said about subsequent films the better.

Waste of a good franchise and some epic source material IMO.