Better Call Saul - Prequel to Breaking Bad

Better Call Saul - Prequel to Breaking Bad

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Tbh I'm at a stage with this show where I'm not sure If I'm watching it because of the Breaking Bad hype or because I enjoy it.

It's all just a bit meh.

ashleyman

6,989 posts

100 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
DoodoolTala said:
Tbh I'm at a stage with this show where I'm not sure If I'm watching it because of the Breaking Bad hype or because I enjoy it.

It's all just a bit meh.
Same.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
it is slow paced, but I think the filmography is pretty good, the shots and set pieces really lift it up from other shows. O.k the story is dragged out and usually the good stuff happens later in the series, but the show really doesn't compare to anything else on TV, it still feels fresh.
If the story can continue in a direction that can still surprise, knowing the information we know in BB.

Edited by The Spruce goose on Wednesday 12th April 12:12

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
It's slower than Breaking Bad but it moves at a consistent rate. They're all such fantastic characters and I could happily watch them for hours. Think about how much time you've watched Mike doing something without him uttering a word or Chuck's tightrope between brilliance and insanity - excellent stuff.

I can't wait for Gus to reappear.

GetCarter

29,408 posts

280 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
One thing for sure... if you didn't see the last season you'd have absolutely NO idea what was going on.

ukbabz

1,551 posts

127 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Very slow episode but enjoyable. I loved the scene of Mike hightailing it away and the background thunderstorm building. Then the searching of the car in the junk yard. All very good.

Saul's part in the episode was quite minor, other than the starting sequence really.

Overall I really enjoyed the episode and it's slower pace was quite good to allow to mental catch up on what happened in S2 (not seen since it aired).

The play with the tracker was very good smile

Rick101

6,970 posts

151 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Glad it's back.

I was a bit confused with the timeline though.


I thought 'dont' was from late on in BB, series 4 or 5? Have I got that mixed up as we are now seeing it pre Walt.

Don Veloci

1,931 posts

282 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
ukbabz said:
Very slow episode but enjoyable. I loved the scene of Mike hightailing it away and the background thunderstorm building. Then the searching of the car in the junk yard. All very good.

Saul's part in the episode was quite minor, other than the starting sequence really.

Overall I really enjoyed the episode and it's slower pace was quite good to allow to mental catch up on what happened in S2 (not seen since it aired).

The play with the tracker was very good smile
My main thought from s3e1 is that I fell I'd rather be watching a show centered around Mike and what he's getting up to.

stuartmmcfc

8,665 posts

193 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
I enjoyed the first episode.

DMN

2,984 posts

140 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
I enjoyed it.

It is slow, but that gives them more time to flesh the characters out. There is also a slight, slow but steady ramping up on tension.

J4CKO

41,661 posts

201 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
I think the slowness is very deliberate, it works for me, so many films and programmes feel rushed, it isnt dirge, as has been said, you get to know the characters and it all seems so much more believable as stuff isnt exploding and people arent getting show every two minutes.


Sir Snaz

571 posts

187 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
I love the pacing of both this and BB ........like the visual equivalent of reading a good book

P-Jay

10,581 posts

192 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
DMN said:
I enjoyed it.

It is slow, but that gives them more time to flesh the characters out. There is also a slight, slow but steady ramping up on tension.
I like it too , but when I read the massive, gushing out pouring of love for series 3 opener on IMDB I got a whiff of Emperor’s New Clothes about it, yes you get the characters in long hand, but lets not forget these are established characters from Breaking Bad, they weren’t background players either, they were a big part of it.

Frankly for me the first series, all 10 hours of it was long enough to flesh out the main players, we know everything we need to know about them it's not a massive cast. Series 2 promised to actually get the story started, but for me it was another 10 hours of tease. Would anyone care to guess how much screen time has passed these last 3 years in real time? A month, two?

Maybe the fact it’s made by AMC tells us all we need to know – they make The Walking Dead too – another good programme but only seems to bother with plot on the last episode of a series.

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
DMN said:
I enjoyed it.

It is slow, but that gives them more time to flesh the characters out. There is also a slight, slow but steady ramping up on tension.
I like it too , but when I read the massive, gushing out pouring of love for series 3 opener on IMDB I got a whiff of Emperor’s New Clothes about it, yes you get the characters in long hand, but lets not forget these are established characters from Breaking Bad, they weren’t background players either, they were a big part of it.

Frankly for me the first series, all 10 hours of it was long enough to flesh out the main players, we know everything we need to know about them it's not a massive cast. Series 2 promised to actually get the story started, but for me it was another 10 hours of tease. Would anyone care to guess how much screen time has passed these last 3 years in real time? A month, two?

Maybe the fact it’s made by AMC tells us all we need to know – they make The Walking Dead too – another good programme but only seems to bother with plot on the last episode of a series.
I'm not a critic. I'm a fan. I've enjoyed the ride so far and am looking forward to Tuesdays for a while.

illmonkey

18,217 posts

199 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
I think the lack of comments says it all. Some ridiculous build up music to see a sign and 1 tracker found. sleep

Don Veloci

1,931 posts

282 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
Enjoyed the latest one and it was only a couple of tiny things that made me smile.

The way Jimmy looks and the way he says "A bit crooked".

The blue Volvo sitting in the background of shot.

mcbook

1,384 posts

176 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
I think the first episode was great. People saying it was slow are right but that's fine with me. I enjoy the way the story is told and love the cinematography: the long shots of the railway yard where Mike met the vet were really atmospheric.

Homeland started off in a similar way and that's one of my favourite shows. Actually a few similarities between Homeland and Saul with the Carrie/Quinn and Saul/Mike story splits. In both cases it's possible that the supporting character is the most interesting.

GetCarter

29,408 posts

280 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
We're lovin' it here. Some very funny moments.

Butter Face

30,353 posts

161 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
Slow again, but this show is a super slow burner anyway.

Poor Jimmy walking into that though, getting stitched right up!

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 19th April 2017
quotequote all
I loved the way they reintroduced Gus very slowly and out of focus in the background.