Discussion
Didn't Jimmy Nesbitt go to Ken Stott's office last week - in the present day - looking for him?
But having offed him (apparently) six years ago, and evidently no body has turned up either, he goes through this charade of asking about him. After six years.
More loose ends than C19 Lancashire cotton mill.
But having offed him (apparently) six years ago, and evidently no body has turned up either, he goes through this charade of asking about him. After six years.
More loose ends than C19 Lancashire cotton mill.
The Don of Croy said:
Didn't Jimmy Nesbitt go to Ken Stott's office last week - in the present day - looking for him?
But having offed him (apparently) six years ago, and evidently no body has turned up either, he goes through this charade of asking about him. After six years.
More loose ends than C19 Lancashire cotton mill.
Bourg went to his office last week. But having offed him (apparently) six years ago, and evidently no body has turned up either, he goes through this charade of asking about him. After six years.
More loose ends than C19 Lancashire cotton mill.
Just been reading up on theories online. Some of mine are there, makes me feel less mental 
Some interesting points:
The hotel owner and the mayor are brothers. Perhaps some weird paedoness going on actually at the hotel.
The boat in the scene was called 'Blue Rose', which was also the name of the care home that the old Doris was in.
Apparently Olly clearly wasn't wearing the yellow scarf when he was taken. People are getting pissed off at this as it's either a glaring continuity error or there really is something in it.
Some interesting points:
The hotel owner and the mayor are brothers. Perhaps some weird paedoness going on actually at the hotel.
The boat in the scene was called 'Blue Rose', which was also the name of the care home that the old Doris was in.
Apparently Olly clearly wasn't wearing the yellow scarf when he was taken. People are getting pissed off at this as it's either a glaring continuity error or there really is something in it.
Right for those struggling to follow the plot. The sequence involving the boat on the indian ocean (Garrett and wife) is a figment of her mind as she has gone mad with keeping the secret of garret murdering their daughter. It's a bit like a
Scene from "a beautiful mind"
The French detective does seem to forget which leg has a limp
The mystery bloke they are trying to find, the one that Nesbitt referred to as being like a ghost is the bloke that slashed the druggie turned teacher.
Bourg is no relation to Garrett, Garrett controlled him through threats to family
Scene from "a beautiful mind"
The French detective does seem to forget which leg has a limp
The mystery bloke they are trying to find, the one that Nesbitt referred to as being like a ghost is the bloke that slashed the druggie turned teacher.
Bourg is no relation to Garrett, Garrett controlled him through threats to family
Jerry Can said:
Right for those struggling to follow the plot. The sequence involving the boat on the indian ocean (Garrett and wife) is a figment of her mind as she has gone mad with keeping the secret of garret murdering their daughter. It's a bit like a
Scene from "a beautiful mind"
The French detective does seem to forget which leg has a limp
The mystery bloke they are trying to find, the one that Nesbitt referred to as being like a ghost is the bloke that slashed the druggie turned teacher.
Bourg is no relation to Garrett, Garrett controlled him through threats to family
Yeah this. It's not that hard to follow is it? Its all starting to come together.Scene from "a beautiful mind"
The French detective does seem to forget which leg has a limp
The mystery bloke they are trying to find, the one that Nesbitt referred to as being like a ghost is the bloke that slashed the druggie turned teacher.
Bourg is no relation to Garrett, Garrett controlled him through threats to family
Watching Tony kill Garrett was great, the horrible b
d deserved it.Can't wait to see what happens in the last 2 episodes.
If Tony killed Paedo Garrett in the past (6 years ago), why did he go to his office in the present? Why did the chap in charge tell him he had sold up and retired 4 years ago (as in 2 years after Tony had killed him?)
My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
sumo69 said:
If Tony killed Paedo Garrett in the past (6 years ago), why did he go to his office in the present? Why did the chap in charge tell him he had sold up and retired 4 years ago (as in 2 years after Tony had killed him?)
My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
Tony didn't go to the office.My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
MiniMan64 said:
sumo69 said:
If Tony killed Paedo Garrett in the past (6 years ago), why did he go to his office in the present? Why did the chap in charge tell him he had sold up and retired 4 years ago (as in 2 years after Tony had killed him?)
My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
Tony didn't go to the office.My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
sumo69 said:
If Tony killed Paedo Garrett in the past (6 years ago), why did he go to his office in the present? Why did the chap in charge tell him he had sold up and retired 4 years ago (as in 2 years after Tony had killed him?)
My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
the guy in the office said he disappeared 6 years ago, he just been declared legally dead (and as said, it was French Paedo, not Nesbitt)My 2p on the scriptwriting confusion!
One thought - has Garrett got an identical twin brother??
David
I'm going to stick my neck out and suggest that the juge d'instruction investigating judge bloke is in some way involved with a paedo ring who abducted Oliver, as was Ian Garrett.
Advance teaser clip of next week's episode - doesn't give anything away though, so safe to watch without spoiling anything
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02ctmlj
Advance teaser clip of next week's episode - doesn't give anything away though, so safe to watch without spoiling anything
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02ctmlj
PurpleTurtle said:
I'm going to stick my neck out and suggest that the juge d'instruction investigating judge bloke is in some way involved with a paedo ring who abducted Oliver, as was Ian Garrett.
Yep this is what the OH and I think - the judge guy is also the brother of the hotel owner. I watched the first episode again last night and when Tony/Olly are the swimming pool before the abduction, there is a guy there with grey hair who looks quite a bit like one of the mechanics from right at the beginning (the older one).We think the whole town, give or take, is involved or at least is turning a blind eye.
One more thing - they've made it a point quite a few times to have James mistaken for Olly. A few different characters have done this... Could he have been the actual target and they took the wrong boy? That might divert the story back onto Mark and something he's done / his job. Given he's quite a big name, it surprises me that he's has so little involvement so far
Mojooo said:
The only problem I have is that it appears the whole Garrett thing is irrelevant to the story of what happened to the kid as is all the stuff with Bourg - the actual story I guess will play out in the final 3 episodes when they fidn this Zig guy.
Maybe Ian Garretts brother comes into it, Garrett mentioned that his abusive Dad/uncle used to abuse both him and his brother just before Tony did him in, If reference to a brother wasn't relevant to the story, why mention him?Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff