Dunkirk - Christopher Nolan film

Author
Discussion

Dakkon

7,826 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
I thought the film was ok at best, the problem is the film did not live up to the media hype, I was left very underwhelmed by it all, certainly not a film to buy, why would you ever watch it twice?

Cobnapint

8,627 posts

151 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
I thought the film was ok at best, the problem is the film did not live up to the media hype, I was left very underwhelmed by it all, certainly not a film to buy, why would you ever watch it twice?
I saw a poster for the dvd in WH Smith. 'Masterpiece' was emblazoned across the top of it.

GetCarter

29,380 posts

279 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
why would you ever watch it twice?
Why would you ever read a book twice, or listen to an album twice?

Perhaps because you wanted to? Because you may see or hear or feel stuff second time around you didn't last time?

I can understand why people don't watch films twice... you need to understand that many people do, and for good reasons.

ETA, I watched 'Road to Perdition' a second time with the TV (screen) off, just so I could just listen to the music. It was better second time round!

I might watch this again with the volume down as Zimmer's soundtrack was a bit too IN YOUR EARS for me

wink

Edited by GetCarter on Tuesday 9th January 15:13

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
I watched it twice, second time on a flight and the Stuka attack coincided perfectly with a full throttle Lufthansa takeoff from Frankfurt, which was nice.

It is a good film for me for the Spitfire flying sequences alone.

Supercilious Sid

2,575 posts

161 months

Thursday 11th January 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Supercilious Sid said:
But they had the right stuff about them. This simply didn't.
If you can define "the right stuff" in this context, please do so.
If you have to ask you wouldn't understand

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Thursday 11th January 2018
quotequote all
Supercilious Sid said:
Eric Mc said:
Supercilious Sid said:
But they had the right stuff about them. This simply didn't.
If you can define "the right stuff" in this context, please do so.
If you have to ask you wouldn't understand
No - it can mean multiple things in different contexts.

I've read the book zillions of times smile

dai1983

2,912 posts

149 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
We need a darkest Hour thread so 70-40 year old blokes can argue about how he's smoking the wrong type of cigars or something

Cobnapint

8,627 posts

151 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
dai1983 said:
We need a darkest Hour thread so 70-40 year old blokes can argue about how he's smoking the wrong type of cigars or something
Going to see it next week so I'll let you know.

mikal83

5,340 posts

252 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
dai1983 said:
We need a darkest Hour thread so 70-40 year old blokes can argue about how he's smoking the wrong type of cigars or something
Bit slow there as Gary Oldman explained all weeks ago. Do try and keep up.

dave_s13

13,814 posts

269 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
blackmme said:

Quite frankly we should expect more and better, Band of Brothers is now 17 years old (scary) and yet in every single episode nails the scale and scope of what it was trying to portray (from the vast like D-Day to intimate such as the woods outside of Bastogne) using whatever physical and virtual tricks were available to do so. It put the story it was trying to tell first.
I've just paid for this on Amazon (£11.99 for the season) after seeing it already but maybe 10years ago.

It's still bloody fantastic. And it is scary that it's 17 years old! Some of the effects are a bit coarse by today's standards but that's just nit-picking. Really is a brilliant bit of film making.

Everyone on this thread please make sure you get hold of BoBrothers and give it a watch.

It would be cracking on a 20k home system by the way.

Legacywr

12,127 posts

188 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
There were two films about WW2 on TV New Years Day, both more entertaining, and factually correct.

The first was Downfall.

And, here’s a clip from the 2nd...

https://youtu.be/fs33mAlkXDI

dai1983

2,912 posts

149 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
factually correct.

The first was Downfall.
https://forum.axishistory.com//viewtopic.php?t=127524

What a st film because of the wrong uniforms and lack of gang rape!

WelshChris

1,177 posts

254 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
I first saw the film at Bluewater Imax. Was very disappointed first time around. The soundtrack was far too loud and the limited dialogue was inaudible, and of course there are the much discussed historical errors which to a large extent I can forgive. Saw it on blu-ray at home and enjoyed it second time around, having had time to consider the impact the film will have on younger viewers who know little about what went on at Dunkirk. This for me is a positive.

What I find it hard to forgive isn't the errors, it's the omissions, specifically the lack of acknowledgement of the contribution of the merchant navy. Yes the idea of the 'little ships' is more evocative for many, but the contribution of the merchant navy was huge. Nolan chose to ignore this much to my disappointment.

Dunkirk plays a large part in my family history. My wife's great grandfather was the captain of the RMS Lady of Mann, one of the eight Isle of Man Steam Packet ships that were present. and won the OBE for his war service. He made four trips to Dunkirk, and the Lady of Mann rescued more soldiers than any other vessel involved. In fact the Manx ships rescued 1 in 14 of all soldiers taken off the beaches. Three Manx ships were lost in the action.

Here's an extract from Wikipedia:

Under the command of her Master Captain T.C. (Daddy) Woods O.B.E., the Lady of Mann joined seven of her Steam Packet sisters at Dunkirk and then at the evacuation of the north-western French ports. After this she spent four years on transport work from Lerwick. She then went south and was engaged in the D-Day landings on the Cherbourg Peninsula.

Requisitioned as a personnel ship at the outbreak of war, she had a good turn of speed, and was able to get in and out of the Dunkirk bombardments and lift 4,262 men back to the relative safety of Dover and Folkestone. She remained for six hours in Dunkirk harbour on 31 May 1940, despite having been damaged by shellfire from shore batteries on her approach and being bombed by enemy aircraft.

She emerged from the bombing with little damage and claimed one enemy aircraft shot down. She was back at Dunkirk in the early hours of 1 June and took off 1,500 casualties. The following day, 2 June, she again steamed into Dunkirk but was ordered back for lack of troops, as by this time the evacuation was drawing towards its close. She picked up 18 French soldiers from a small boat on her way back and landed them in England. On the night of 3 June, she made her last trip to the shattered harbour. She berthed alongside the East Pier at a little after midnight on the morning of 4 June, and left for England after embarking another 1,244 troops in little over an hour. Later that afternoon, Operation Dynamo ended.

Over the period of the evacuation, the Lady of Mann had lifted more troops to safety than any other vessel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Lady_of_Mann

Here's a letter we have at home. We have his complete life story on paper, from birth to death certificates, merchant navy records, personal correspondence and OBE. It is currently on loan to the Manx Museum, and will be donated to them eventually.



Edited by WelshChris on Friday 12th January 16:40


Edited by WelshChris on Friday 12th January 16:41

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 12th January 2018
quotequote all
I watched it on the plane at Christmas, really enjoyed it.

But I'm no historian or movie critic, I even enjoyed Captain Underpants on the way home. laugh

272BHP

5,059 posts

236 months

Sunday 14th January 2018
quotequote all
Just watched this and thought it was quite enjoyable although perhaps lacking an emotional hit.

The quality of the Bluray transfer is just astonishing though. Switching to full screen for scenery had a great impact and the scenes of the Spitfire over the beaches was jaw dropping.

mikal83

5,340 posts

252 months

Sunday 14th January 2018
quotequote all
272BHP said:
Just watched this and thought it was quite enjoyable although perhaps lacking an emotional hit.

The quality of the Bluray transfer is just astonishing though. Switching to full screen for scenery had a great impact and the scenes of the Spitfire over the beaches was jaw dropping.
As was when it burnt and WOW wheres the engine gone!

272BHP

5,059 posts

236 months

Sunday 14th January 2018
quotequote all
mikal83 said:
As was when it burnt and WOW wheres the engine gone!
Didn't even notice, and why on earth would I?

mikal83

5,340 posts

252 months

Sunday 14th January 2018
quotequote all
272BHP said:
mikal83 said:
As was when it burnt and WOW wheres the engine gone!
Didn't even notice, and why on earth would I?
But you noticed it was a spitfire, so you obviously did eh!

stuartmmcfc

8,662 posts

192 months

Sunday 21st January 2018
quotequote all
Very late to the party but we’ve just finished it and despite the Wife and son enjoying it, I thought it was pants.
A bit to orderly and lacking in confusion to make it seem realistic.
The big surprise was that Harry Styles didnt stand out.
The rest of the cast were just as awful.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
I finally got around to watching the first 6 episodes of BoB over the weekend while the wife was away, brilliant series with lots of familiar faces.

It's on Sky Anytime for those who haven't seen it yet.