Dunkirk - Christopher Nolan film
Discussion
gt40steve said:
As others have already said 'Dunkirk' 1958 staring John Mills is a million times better. More accurate, more realistic & a better watch.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051565/fullcredits
Isn't it just. There are far too many 'eh...?' moments in Nolan's half baked effort.https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051565/fullcredits
blackmme said:
Based on what I have read the few minutes of Dunkirk scenes in Atonement capture the chaos and scale of Dunkirk far better than the near 2 hours of Nolan’s over complex under researched mess.
Ah , but that is because it was filmed in Redcar, which always feels as though it's a war zone under siege . Cobnapint said:
gt40steve said:
As others have already said 'Dunkirk' 1958 staring John Mills is a million times better. More accurate, more realistic & a better watch.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051565/fullcredits
Isn't it just. There are far too many 'eh...?' moments in Nolan's half baked effort.https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051565/fullcredits
JagLover said:
Legacywr said:
That was a much better film.
Different battle of course but "A Bridge too far" remains the gold standard for me. Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff