Lost in Space - New Netflix series

Author
Discussion

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
6/10. Can do better. If second episode is the same quality then back burner for a really dull rainy Sunday.

ChocolateFrog

25,344 posts

173 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
The space scenes look good but some really annoying bits that seem wrong or just sloppily done.

Let's not go back down to the ship until 30 seconds before it's due to freeze solid despite having suits that work under water.
Thousands of gallons of water can freeze in seconds yet the air temp is warm enough not to need hats and gloves. She also stuck a scalpel in her mouth that was at ambient temp without it taking her skin off so must be well above 0 degrees.

These things bug me enough to make it a frustrating watch.

Also why does the computer not attempt to correct the course until after it's irrelevantly told them they're off course. Don't get me started on the g-forces they would have sustained from a deceleration like that yet they all walk away without mushy internal organs. Finally, as I could rant on, how does Will miss the robot on the branch and how does the robot miss Will when he goes to swipe him, a stationary object 2 ft in front of him.

I'm maybe taking it too seriously.

I'll give it one more episode.

Watchman

6,391 posts

245 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
I've seen the first 3 and I'm a bit bored. I'll continue but really only because I've nothing better to watch. Some of the cgi is a bit cheap looking but other cgi is top notch. Odd but whatever.

Hope it picks up.

TheGuru

744 posts

101 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
I'm maybe taking it too seriously.
Far too seriously, just watch it for what it is and enjoy it. I can never understand why people obsess about such trivial matters in films/shows that are clearly not meant to be scientifically accurate, it’s a more like a live action cartoon based on a 1960’s SciFi show.

And let’s not forget:

-it’s based only 30 years in the future
-they are travelling 40 trillion km to their destination
-they survived a wormhole

Anything else is utterly believable in comparison


ChocolateFrog

25,344 posts

173 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
TheGuru said:
ChocolateFrog said:
I'm maybe taking it too seriously.
Far too seriously, just watch it for what it is and enjoy it. I can never understand why people obsess about such trivial matters in films/shows that are clearly not meant to be scientifically accurate, it’s a more like a live action cartoon based on a 1960’s SciFi show.

And let’s not forget:

-it’s based only 30 years in the future
-they are travelling 40 trillion km to their destination
-they survived a wormhole

Anything else is utterly believable in comparison
I don't mind those bits though. It's like Star Trek getting away with physics murder because they've got 'inertial dampers', because they've attempted to address it you can believe it.

This just comes across as extremely lazy production.

BossHogg

6,013 posts

178 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
It's science fiction, not science fact, it's reasonable brain out telly, I'll be watching more. wink

singlecoil

33,610 posts

246 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
Two things that bugged me about the first episode- first there's a dire situation taking place (don't want to risk a spoiler) where every second counts and yet there's time for people to argue, look at each other meaningfully, give out vital information bit by bit for dramatic effect whereas all concerned should be doing stuff as fast as they possibly could.

Then the situation is saved by an almost literal deus ex machina.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina

I hope it's going to get better, much better.

They've obviously spent a lot of money on it, shame to see it wasted by poor plotting and scripting.

Vipers

32,884 posts

228 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
Watched all episodes, throughly enjoyed it, may it continue.

ChocolateFrog

25,344 posts

173 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
I'm tapping out after 4 episodes.

Literally couldn't give a st what happens to any of the characters, less maybe the robot.

Episode 3 is like a parody of Tremors but with all the comedy and suspense removed.


SpudLink

5,786 posts

192 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
I’ve just realised this has it’s own thread, so I’ll quote my own post from the NetFlix thread...
SpudLink said:
Lost in Space

5 episodes in and I like it. But no more than that. If it didn’t have the title of a childhood favourite I probably wouldn’t have bothered after episode 1.

I couldn’t see the point of the 2nd daughter. Colonists are supposed to be ‘the best of the best’, but she doesn’t seem to fit that mould. I figure they need a character who the teen audience can relate to more than the über competent older sibling.

My willingness to suspend disbelief was severely tested by the scene with the high altitude balloon. The lower pressure should have caused the balloon to expand, but it remained the same size as it was when she left the ground.

However it’s entertaining enough for what it is. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t enjoying it.

And Robbie the unnamed robot is very good.
I agree with some of the things that have already been said. Putting the frozen scalpel in her mouth really bugged me. The same with the scene where she’s driving at high speed across tricky terrain, but her eyes aren’t focused on the road. The thing is, I get annoyed by similar things in many shows. But in this case the entertainment value is enough to keep me watching.


wjb

5,100 posts

131 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
It's not real guys hehe

Mutts

285 posts

158 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
i enjoyed it, binge watched it over the weekend.
Nice to see a model of the original "Lost in Space" robot on the shelf in Will's quarters.

Vipers

32,884 posts

228 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
Mutts said:
i enjoyed it, binge watched it over the weekend.
Nice to see a model of the original "Lost in Space" robot on the shelf in Will's quarters.
Interesting link between the earlier version and this one, whisky was involved. If I remember correctly someone asked Robbie to make some whisky for them.

Oh well, back to Star Trek Voyager re-runs.

singlecoil

33,610 posts

246 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
I watched the second, and probably in my case, last episode and was dismayed at the introduction of the sociopath character. Presumably this is to increase the internal tension in the expanded group and set the scene for more drama. Obviously all fiction needs to have conflict but writers should be wary of making their setups too obvious.

TheGuru

744 posts

101 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
I watched the second, and probably in my case, last episode and was dismayed at the introduction of the sociopath character. Presumably this is to increase the internal tension in the expanded group and set the scene for more drama. Obviously all fiction needs to have conflict but writers should be wary of making their setups too obvious.
Have you seen the 1960's show it was based on?

singlecoil

33,610 posts

246 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
TheGuru said:
singlecoil said:
I watched the second, and probably in my case, last episode and was dismayed at the introduction of the sociopath character. Presumably this is to increase the internal tension in the expanded group and set the scene for more drama. Obviously all fiction needs to have conflict but writers should be wary of making their setups too obvious.
Have you seen the 1960's show it was based on?
No, I haven't. A look at the Wikipedia article shows that the original Smith character was important to the plot and so would have been a very obvious plot device in the original show too.



Sparky137

869 posts

181 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Interesting link between the earlier version and this one, whisky was involved. If I remember correctly someone asked Robbie to make some whisky for them.
That was the cook in the film Forbidden Planet.

Vipers

32,884 posts

228 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
Sparky137 said:
Vipers said:
Interesting link between the earlier version and this one, whisky was involved. If I remember correctly someone asked Robbie to make some whisky for them.
That was the cook in the film Forbidden Planet.
Whoops........ your right there, I had an inkling it was a cook as well.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
My kids enjoyed this. Some ok cgi, kids discovering stuff and having adventures, I think it’s more aimed at 12 year olds than adults really.

kennydies

198 posts

118 months

Monday 16th April 2018
quotequote all
It is more "lost on a planet" than lost in space....