Catch 22

Author
Discussion

Athlon

5,022 posts

207 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
I am enjoying it!

DickyC

49,850 posts

199 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
Yes. Enjoyed that. No one yet is how I pictured them from the book but, y'know.

lufbramatt

5,355 posts

135 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Spot the issue in this shot


DickyC

49,850 posts

199 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
He's lost quite a lot of his gun.

Steve vRS

4,852 posts

242 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Enjoyed it. The aerial shots were fantastic. Hard to tell which (if any) planes were real and which were CGI.

nicanary

9,812 posts

147 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Steve vRS said:
Enjoyed it. The aerial shots were fantastic. Hard to tell which (if any) planes were real and which were CGI.
The formation flying seemed a bit close together, but otherwise I agree. I thought they made a good effort at recreating the Italian landscape beneath the planes, presumably California with enhancements (unlike many WW2 films which made no attempt to hide the fact, that's YOU Battle of the Bulge!)

bristolracer

5,546 posts

150 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Im enjoying it.

Also gives me huge admiration for the bravery of those bomber guys. I simply cannot imagine the sheer terror of being in one of those planes when every nazi below is trying to flak you out of the sky.

8 to 12 missions was the life expectancy.

lufbramatt

5,355 posts

135 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
nicanary said:
The formation flying seemed a bit close together, but otherwise I agree. I thought they made a good effort at recreating the Italian landscape beneath the planes, presumably California with enhancements (unlike many WW2 films which made no attempt to hide the fact, that's YOU Battle of the Bulge!)
I think most of it was filmed on location in italy and Sardinia, a couple of B-25 aircraft stopped at Duxford last year on their way back to the states after they had finished filming.

nicanary

9,812 posts

147 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
nicanary said:
The formation flying seemed a bit close together, but otherwise I agree. I thought they made a good effort at recreating the Italian landscape beneath the planes, presumably California with enhancements (unlike many WW2 films which made no attempt to hide the fact, that's YOU Battle of the Bulge!)
I think most of it was filmed on location in italy and Sardinia, a couple of B-25 aircraft stopped at Duxford last year on their way back to the states after they had finished filming.
Thanks. That rather explains the accuracy!

TheRainMaker

6,354 posts

243 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
Spot the issue in this shot

I noticed that, all the planes were the same.

DickyC

49,850 posts

199 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
From what I've read you saw both of them. They could only find two airworthy examples and would fly a shot repeatedly in different positions to be able to create formations.

stuarthat

Original Poster:

1,051 posts

219 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Yes this is a great mini series gets better and better .

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I watched the first ep, it was a tad underwhelming.
SOme good bits, for sure, but something is missing

biggbn

23,524 posts

221 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Enjoyed first episode, having watched the film, I already had an idea planted in my mind reader what the characters looked like, but that dissapeared in minutes. Enjoyed it, hard to dramatise a work that is both Sisyphean and Kafkaesque in its absurdity yet is so grounded in reality. I thought it was a good stab, but to enjoy it in full technicolor 3d magnificence...read the book and let your mind do the work....look forward to next episodes

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I recall the film with fondness, love the book, read it several times, though not for years...time to dust it off methinks.
It was nice for the old names to pop up.

Some Gump

12,712 posts

187 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Thought it was reasonable. Not as good as the book but good fun.

Also, for fans of the book - read "the 100 year old man who climbed out of the window and dissappeared". Same style of irrelevant humour.

biggbn

23,524 posts

221 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I may revisit Heller's other works, good as gold and something happened, I recall reading them when I was younger but can't recall anything about them!!

Heller was once told he had never written anything as good as catch 22, his answer was 'I agree, but neither has anyone else!!'

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I reall reading SOmething Happened, wasn't that impressed with it. Think I@ve read Good as Gold but cannot recall a thing. I read the follow-up to Catch 22, wasn't as good but it kept me entertained and went a lil nuts I think...I'll reread that one too

XCP

16,948 posts

229 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Someone will be along shortly, no doubt, to point out that the bombers should have been the type G rather than the type F. In any case I enjoyed it.

jjaack

109 posts

98 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Thought it was reasonable. Not as good as the book but good fun.

Also, for fans of the book - read "the 100 year old man who climbed out of the window and dissappeared". Same style of irrelevant humour.
Forgot I had read that until you mentioned it, I'll have to read it again, I do remember laughing lots though and that it was quite bizarre.