BBC War of the Worlds

Author
Discussion

james_TW

16,287 posts

198 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
Seriously though. What's with the ants though?

motco

15,974 posts

247 months

Friday 13th December 2019
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
Very disappointed.
As am I, It was twaddle and disjointed twaddle at that.

Narcisus

8,082 posts

281 months

Friday 13th December 2019
quotequote all
I picked this up a few months ago. It's very, very well done.

https://www.sherwoodsoundstudios.com/2017/04/02/th...

Clockwork Cupcake

74,632 posts

273 months

Friday 13th December 2019
quotequote all
james_TW said:
Seriously though. What's with the ants though?
It might have been a reference to The Selenites who appeared in the book The First Men in the Moon, also by H.G. Wells, who "appear in the crossover novel The Martian War by Kevin J. Anderson, where it is revealed that they have been captured by the Martians and are been used both as slave labour and as food"
[source: https://waroftheworlds.fandom.com/wiki/Selenites ]

Or it could simply have been a clumsy metaphor for how busy and industrious we as humans are, but are as insignificant as ants to the Martians.


Edited by Clockwork Cupcake on Friday 13th December 17:36

timbo999

1,295 posts

256 months

Friday 13th December 2019
quotequote all
james_TW said:
Seriously though. What's with the ants though?
Again, it is a theme in HG's novel; in chapter 7 there is a discussion between the artillery man and the journalist about the war being like that between man and ants.

rich350z

360 posts

163 months

Friday 13th December 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
As am I, It was twaddle and disjointed twaddle at that.
Having just wasted 3 hours of my life, that's a better review than I'd have given it.


Ladders

247 posts

225 months

Saturday 14th December 2019
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
AFAIK, three-legged creatures didn't even get a toe-hold in the evolutionary scheme of things on earth. Maybe there's a good reason.
I remember reading somewhere that most life in nature is symmetrical, hence why most life has two, four or six legs etc. Same with plants and leaves etc.

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

84 months

Sunday 15th December 2019
quotequote all
If you are lost in the jungle and think you know where to go you will probably walk in a circle due to the tiny difference in one leg over the other.
Imagine the crazy path 3 legs would send you on .Haha BBC bozos and haberdashery shop worker hg wells...

SpudLink

5,889 posts

193 months

Tuesday 17th December 2019
quotequote all
Talking of tripod aliens, the original 6 part Quatermass and the Pit is available on iPlayer.

motco

15,974 posts

247 months

Tuesday 17th December 2019
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
Talking of tripod aliens, the original 6 part Quatermass and the Pit is available on iPlayer.
Thanks for that Spudlink, I enjoy the cinema film of it, and I assume that the 6 parter has different casting. I have DVDs of the last Qutermass - the one with John Mills and Barbara Kellerman.

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Tuesday 17th December 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
Thanks for that Spudlink, I enjoy the cinema film of it, and I assume that the 6 parter has different casting. I have DVDs of the last Qutermass - the one with John Mills and Barbara Kellerman.
It's very good and yes, completely differently cast.

Quatermass is Andre Morell.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th December 2019
quotequote all
Ladders said:
Halmyre said:
AFAIK, three-legged creatures didn't even get a toe-hold in the evolutionary scheme of things on earth. Maybe there's a good reason.
I remember reading somewhere that most life in nature is symmetrical, hence why most life has two, four or six legs etc. Same with plants and leaves etc.
Yes, that's the reason we don't see 3 legged things. Going right back to the lowest level, cells split in two in order to reproduce, so everything will tend to be divided that way.

g3org3y

20,644 posts

192 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Despite the crap reviews, thought I'd watch it (as a fan of the book and the Musical).

I am disappoint.

I actually said to my wife after Ep1 that I was surprised the BBC didn't manage to get any 'individuals of colour' into the show. Cue the rescued child in Ep2.

Killer2005 said:
rofl

snuffy

9,825 posts

285 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
According to this week's Private Eye, the new versions of A Christmas Carol and Worzel Gummage are even more woke than WOTW was.