Clarkson’s Farm
Discussion
I think people who watch, enjoy it because we all know Clarkson likes to play the buffoon and can afford it easily
He does bring to the masses how ridiculous the farming regulations and red tape are for normal farmers.
I don't care how much he's being paid by Amazon, better value than Gary Lineker
He does bring to the masses how ridiculous the farming regulations and red tape are for normal farmers.
I don't care how much he's being paid by Amazon, better value than Gary Lineker
DeejRC said:
-Cappo- said:
Caddyshack said:
UTH said:
jammy-git said:
Pflanzgarten said:
It’s a perverse business model in the extreme!
Clarkson can piss about making his farm lose money for sts and giggles on the TV, write off those losses against the tax man and then coin it in by showing his “mistakes and bad luck” for all us to watch.
I'm not sure Clarkson, rumoured to be about to get a $250m deal to make three more series, after already making bank via Top Gear, really needs to worry about paying a few thousand in tax in farm profits...Clarkson can piss about making his farm lose money for sts and giggles on the TV, write off those losses against the tax man and then coin it in by showing his “mistakes and bad luck” for all us to watch.
Anybody who has ever raised lambs and sheep will recognise that. Or battled farm machinery and trying to attach sodding awkward equipments to the PTO and the swing arms. Especially when it’s cold and/or dark. And the bd things won’t go in. And planning permission. And the requisite livestock paperwork.
Lucas Ayde said:
PinkTornado said:
Fourth series now confirmed.
They're really milking it ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57GzA43NkVQ
The trouble is though Sway, “the insanity of…” is the default position as opposed to being the exception. You throw a bit of sheep poo in any one direction and you hit upon a scheme which is more insanity than useful, as opposed to simple normal, useful schemes from the powers that be.
Did the restaurant ever go 'live' ? As in serving to the paying public on an ongoing basis...
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
Lucas Ayde said:
Did the restaurant ever go 'live' ? As in serving to the paying public on an ongoing basis...
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
I guess yes.I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU-JJiF5Twg
Lucas Ayde said:
Did the restaurant ever go 'live' ? As in serving to the paying public on an ongoing basis...
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
Yes, but I don't think it ever ran over winter because the practicalities and the legalities made it unsustainable. I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
https://www.countryandtownhouse.com/food-and-drink...
119 said:
Lucas Ayde said:
Did the restaurant ever go 'live' ? As in serving to the paying public on an ongoing basis...
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
I guess yes.I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU-JJiF5Twg
Mars said:
119 said:
Lucas Ayde said:
Did the restaurant ever go 'live' ? As in serving to the paying public on an ongoing basis...
I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
I guess yes.I got the impression that they put on a show for the cameras for one day with an invited group of guests, so as to have a nice finish to S2, but it seemed to me that as things were presented, it clearly wasn't workable as an operating business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU-JJiF5Twg
It is entertainment ultimately, but no one, no matter the financial backing goes in to make a loss for a bit of a laugh. Any farmer (Clarkson is one) cares about the land, the crops and the animals, that is what the business is, you make the best product at the best price for the best return.
The problem is that most of what happens is out of your control as farming livestock or crops is heavily impacted by the weather. You spend 250k on a tractor, plow, drill, fertilisers, seeds etc. The crop then gets flooded and washed away or drowned your income is gone. This is why farming sees so much suicide.
I own a smallholding but do my day job to pay the bills. I could not bear the stress of it if it was my only income. I was bad enough this year when we were really struggling to get enough dry days to make hay.
Clarkson is doing farming a huge favour through the show, something yfile completely fails to do despite being from the national broadcaster. Hope it carries on for many more series.
The problem is that most of what happens is out of your control as farming livestock or crops is heavily impacted by the weather. You spend 250k on a tractor, plow, drill, fertilisers, seeds etc. The crop then gets flooded and washed away or drowned your income is gone. This is why farming sees so much suicide.
I own a smallholding but do my day job to pay the bills. I could not bear the stress of it if it was my only income. I was bad enough this year when we were really struggling to get enough dry days to make hay.
Clarkson is doing farming a huge favour through the show, something yfile completely fails to do despite being from the national broadcaster. Hope it carries on for many more series.
Tom8 said:
It is entertainment ultimately, but no one, no matter the financial backing goes in to make a loss for a bit of a laugh. Any farmer (Clarkson is one) cares about the land, the crops and the animals, that is what the business is, you make the best product at the best price for the best return.
Clarkson has started and failed at least one on-site business, has ruined half his crops, had destroyed grazing with halfwitted machinery use and is on his third livestock experiment in as many years...He's definitely not farming for the good of the land, the animals or the profit margin. But who cares? The show makes mega bucks and the beer sells at a massive premium.
Tom8 said:
The problem is that most of what happens is out of your control as farming livestock or crops is heavily impacted by the weather. You spend 250k on a tractor, plow, drill, fertilisers, seeds etc. The crop then gets flooded and washed away or drowned your income is gone. This is why farming sees so much suicide.
But Clarkson hasn't suffered any shocks like that, his failures have largely been obvious from the very beginning (poor fencing, local planning, inappropriate crops).Tom8 said:
Clarkson is doing farming a huge favour through the show, something yfile completely fails to do despite being from the national broadcaster. Hope it carries on for many more series.
Perhaps because you're comparing to a show with one that has actual farmers who need to have a viable farming business. Evanivitch said:
Tom8 said:
It is entertainment ultimately, but no one, no matter the financial backing goes in to make a loss for a bit of a laugh. Any farmer (Clarkson is one) cares about the land, the crops and the animals, that is what the business is, you make the best product at the best price for the best return.
Clarkson has started and failed at least one on-site business, has ruined half his crops, had destroyed grazing with halfwitted machinery use and is on his third livestock experiment in as many years...He's definitely not farming for the good of the land, the animals or the profit margin. But who cares? The show makes mega bucks and the beer sells at a massive premium.
Tom8 said:
The problem is that most of what happens is out of your control as farming livestock or crops is heavily impacted by the weather. You spend 250k on a tractor, plow, drill, fertilisers, seeds etc. The crop then gets flooded and washed away or drowned your income is gone. This is why farming sees so much suicide.
But Clarkson hasn't suffered any shocks like that, his failures have largely been obvious from the very beginning (poor fencing, local planning, inappropriate crops).Tom8 said:
Clarkson is doing farming a huge favour through the show, something yfile completely fails to do despite being from the national broadcaster. Hope it carries on for many more series.
Perhaps because you're comparing to a show with one that has actual farmers who need to have a viable farming business. Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff