Top Gun 2 (No Spoilers)

Author
Discussion

Cotty

39,568 posts

285 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
bobbo89 said:
Be difficult to pull it off as you can't lean on the nostalgia as much like they did with Maverick which, IMO, was one of the reasons it was so good.

Still, why not, go for it!
Agreed, there are 36 years between the original and TG Maverick. You can't really lean into the nostalgia if the next film is only a couple of years from now. Mind you good excuse to include Jennifer Connelly again.

williamp

19,263 posts

274 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Id like to see the TopnGun multiverse. F4 v MiG 21, meteor v Me163 etc etc

RB Will

9,666 posts

241 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Cotty said:
bobbo89 said:
Be difficult to pull it off as you can't lean on the nostalgia as much like they did with Maverick which, IMO, was one of the reasons it was so good.

Still, why not, go for it!
Agreed, there are 36 years between the original and TG Maverick. You can't really lean into the nostalgia if the next film is only a couple of years from now. Mind you good excuse to include Jennifer Connelly again.
My thought too. Just watch Mav again last week, first rewatch since once at the cinema, thoroughly enjoyed it. There are a lot of call backs to the original and they give you the feels.

It will end up a bit Fast and Furious if it keeps trying to wedge in Mav racing a jet on bike, piano in bar, beach game, jumping in an F-14 etc.

Radec

3,852 posts

48 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
It'll probably be something like his dad is still alive and needs to be rescued behind enemy lines.

Don Veloci

1,928 posts

282 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Radec said:
It'll probably be something like his dad is still alive and needs to be rescued behind enemy lines.
hehe Tom Skerritt still ticking!

Maverick and Viper steal an F14 and F4 from a museum to rescue pops. Jester bails them out.

Scabutz

7,632 posts

81 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Don Veloci said:
hehe Tom Skerritt still ticking!

Maverick and Viper steal an F14 and F4 from a museum to rescue pops. Jester bails them out.
Sounds epic. Skerritt did shoot a scene for Maverick. He was at Icemans funeral but was cut.

Radec

3,852 posts

48 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Don Veloci said:
Radec said:
It'll probably be something like his dad is still alive and needs to be rescued behind enemy lines.
hehe Tom Skerritt still ticking!

Maverick and Viper steal an F14 and F4 from a museum to rescue pops. Jester bails them out.
Rooster and Hangman have a mission over Vietnam, they both get taken out by a highly skilled fighter pilot in a dogfight and captured by some militia group.

Maverick and a team is sent in to rescue them, after his team is taken out it's only Mav and this one enemy fighter.
Mav does the old roll over giving the guy the finger move at the same time.

They end up shooting each other down and land in the jungle.
After a bit of fisticuffs, the enemy has his helmet removed and turns out to be none other than Mitchell Sr, who is now on the enemy side with a grudge against the US for leaving him out there to rot.

Mav then has some bad luck, this in turns leads to a crisis in confidence until the love of a good women helps him turn things around.

The End.

C5_Steve

3,117 posts

104 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
I didn't think I needed another Top Gun after the original but Maverick was brilliant. Cruise doesn't need to do another unless he KNOWS it'll be a success so if they do move ahead with it, I'm sure it'll be good.

MrBig

2,705 posts

130 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Scabutz said:
Saw that. I'm a little unsure. I loved Maverick and I think TC went out of his way to make sure it was good and gave the fans what they wanted.

This just smacks of a studio cashing in.

I mean don't get me wrong I'll be first in the queue when it's released and will no doubt watch it a dozen or so times at the cinema, but I just hope they don't rest on their laurels.
Absolutely this, Maverick was everything the diehard TG fan would want, even down to the F14's appearance, I really hope they don't spoil it for the next one.

GCH

3,992 posts

203 months

Monday 15th January
quotequote all
Radec said:
Mav then has some bad luck, this in turns leads to a crisis in confidence until the love of a good women helps him turn things around.
hehe Hat tip to Rich Hall

JagLover

42,437 posts

236 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
Now out on Netflix in 4K so gave it a watch.

Only waited until now as I didn't have the home setup to do movies like this justice and now I do.

Very good I thought. You could nitpick a lot of it, and it is far less grounded in reality than the original, but as a proper entertaining action blockbuster it is what we have been waiting for these past few years.

Evanivitch

20,114 posts

123 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
Radec said:
Rooster and Hangman have a mission over Vietnam, they both get taken out by a highly skilled fighter pilot in a dogfight and captured by some militia group.

Maverick and a team is sent in to rescue them, after his team is taken out it's only Mav and this one enemy fighter.
Mav does the old roll over giving the guy the finger move at the same time.

They end up shooting each other down and land in the jungle.
After a bit of fisticuffs, the enemy has his helmet removed and turns out to be none other than Mitchell Sr, who is now on the enemy side with a grudge against the US for leaving him out there to rot.

Mav then has some bad luck, this in turns leads to a crisis in confidence until the love of a good women helps him turn things around.

The End.
And then the Mission Impossible theme plays...

MC Bodge

21,634 posts

176 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
We watched it last weekend. It was good for what it was, although it was a bit silly in places and was full of obvious references to the original.

Unlike the original, though, much of which I remember from seeing It many years ago, as a pastiche, it was ultimately quite forgettable.

Ron240

2,772 posts

120 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
We watched it last weekend. It was good for what it was, although it was a bit silly in places and was full of obvious references to the original.

Unlike the original, though, much of which I remember from seeing It many years ago, as a pastiche, it was ultimately quite forgettable.
So you didnt personally rate it then. laugh

MC Bodge

21,634 posts

176 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
Ron240 said:
MC Bodge said:
We watched it last weekend. It was good for what it was, although it was a bit silly in places and was full of obvious references to the original.

Unlike the original, though, much of which I remember from seeing It many years ago, as a pastiche, it was ultimately quite forgettable.
So you didnt personally rate it then. laugh
It was ok, if you like that kind of thing.

It would have looked/felt better on a huge screen, of course.

biggbn

23,423 posts

221 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Ron240 said:
MC Bodge said:
We watched it last weekend. It was good for what it was, although it was a bit silly in places and was full of obvious references to the original.

Unlike the original, though, much of which I remember from seeing It many years ago, as a pastiche, it was ultimately quite forgettable.
So you didnt personally rate it then. laugh
It was ok, if you like that kind of thing.

It would have looked/felt better on a huge screen, of course.
I saw it at the cinema, but it was a McDonalds experience for me, enjoyable but in no way satisfying, made to an oft used formula, has fans who will always go back, and ones who only pop in when there are no other options...and many people who have never even experienced one are quick to criticise....

asfault

12,227 posts

180 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
I don't need another one. The story is complete. Mav has a great life now with his own ww2 fighter, his godson a smoking hot milf and a fully stocked bar.