Jurassic Park!

Author
Discussion

squirrel2007

Original Poster:

2,653 posts

186 months

Sunday 9th August 2009
quotequote all
Just watching this on ITV2 I cant believe this is 16 years old, it still looks ace! Cant think of too many films that have aged this well. Makes me feel bloody old though, I went to see this on my 10th Birthday!!!

Athlon

5,020 posts

207 months

Sunday 9th August 2009
quotequote all
Great film!

escargot

17,110 posts

218 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
squirrel2007 said:
Just watching this on ITV2 I cant believe this is 16 years old, it still looks ace! Cant think of too many films that have aged this well. Makes me feel bloody old though, I went to see this on my 10th Birthday!!!
Bloody hell, me too. It's the only film i've ever watched at the cinema more than once.

FourWheelDrift

88,562 posts

285 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
So many film plot holes. Like the massive cliff drop off into the T-Rex enclosure during the night scene that was previously flat as a pancake during the earlier day scene and the Velociraptors being about 10 times their actual size.

But is has Dinosaurs in it and any film that tweaks the nose of creationists is fine by me.

Eric Mc

122,077 posts

266 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
Book is even better - and much more intelligent.

However, the CGI was ground breaking at the time and really knocked me out.

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

253 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
...and the Velociraptors being about 10 times their actual size...
Luckily they've been dead a gazillion years so only geeks would know that/care. (almost as bad as anyone that thinks pointing out the Migs in Top Gun weren't Migs is making a useful addition!)

escargot

17,110 posts

218 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
I think Jurassic Park falls very much into the brainless entertainment genre. I reckon historical accuracy was pretty far down the list when they were making it. wink

FourWheelDrift

88,562 posts

285 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
Tiggsy said:
FourWheelDrift said:
...and the Velociraptors being about 10 times their actual size...
Luckily they've been dead a gazillion years so only geeks would know that/care. (almost as bad as anyone that thinks pointing out the Migs in Top Gun weren't Migs is making a useful addition!)
Well done for pointing that out.

Jasandjules

69,948 posts

230 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
It's a good film, novel idea.

There may, just may, be one or two plot holes etc... but hey ho.

squirrel2007

Original Poster:

2,653 posts

186 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
Ruddy great dinosaurs going round eating people. It's not a documentary it's just a great film.

Guffy

2,311 posts

266 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
Do all plot-hole specialists speak with an adenoid problem and drive diesels? biggrin

Great popcorn movie and as pointed out, still holds it's own today.

Negative Creep

24,992 posts

228 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
My favourite childhood film and one of those very rare ones that are just as good as you remember them

whitechief

4,423 posts

196 months

Monday 10th August 2009
quotequote all
Holy st, 16 years ago! That has really surprised me.

Eric Mc

122,077 posts

266 months

Tuesday 11th August 2009
quotequote all
Us dinosaur nerds knew that the Raptors were a tad too big (they weren't ten times too big - more like twice as large). It didn't spoil the viewing.

Just after the film was completed, paeleontoligists discovered a new species of Raptor which they named Utahraptor. Utahraptor is almost identical in size to the Raptors in the film.

The main problem with the Raptors in the film is that it is now thought that it was very likely that Velociraptors were actually feathered. But no one knew that in 1992/93.

However, as I said earlier, I would highly recommend that yuou read the book - which is a bit more subtle in plot compared to the film.

squirrel2007

Original Poster:

2,653 posts

186 months

Tuesday 11th August 2009
quotequote all
The book is excellent, I read it around the time the film was released.

I used to be a bit of a dinosaur nerd as a kid and, to be honest, the film makers used a bit of artistic license but I dont care. I've never seen a dinosaur before, there might have been bigger Raptors than we've found so far, I certainly didn't lose any sleep over it!

What do we think of the other two films? I quite enjoyed JP2. It wasn't a patch on the original but it was enjoyable none the less.

JP3 was poo. poo story. poo cop-out ending. plus, everyone knows T-Rex is the best regardless of what may gave been discovered since. It's the biggest scariest one that we all loved as a kid and killing it off with that rubbish spinowhatsit was a mistake.


JP4? I dont think it will happen which is probably a good thing. In this day and age the dinosaurs would probably have fallen into the hands of the terrorists and would be set loose to eat everyone who isnt a terrorist. and they'd probably have gun-hats on too.

OR

They'd be dying out again because nobody drives Priuses and the Eco-mentalists would shoe-horn in some nonsence about saving the world if we give up modern excesses and return to the stone age and then it would basiclly become the flintstones and the dinosaurs would become lawn mowers and showers and............actually that sounds fantastic!!!

Off to write JP4:return of the Flintstones (or something like that!)
getmecoat

Eric Mc

122,077 posts

266 months

Tuesday 11th August 2009
quotequote all
I think the stories were taken about as far as they could go - and Michael Crichton is no longer withn us.

squirrel2007

Original Poster:

2,653 posts

186 months

Tuesday 11th August 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I think the stories were taken about as far as they could go - and Michael Crichton is no longer withn us.
Pff! I'm sure I could give it a bash!