The Hobbit to be filmed in the UK?

Author
Discussion

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Halb said:
davido140 said:
Weren't locations in middle earth based on places around the UK when Tolkein wrote the books?
The English bits like the Shire were parts of where he grew up, and the goblins technology was the way industrialisation was moving through the Midlands. Doubt he lived near anything like the Lonely mountain or the Misty Mountains.biggrin
edit, though I think the desolation of Smaug may also be connect to industrialisation.

Edited by Halb on Monday 25th October 09:58
No, Aberdeenshire!

ZesPak

24,435 posts

197 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
davido140 said:
grumbledoak said:
davido140 said:
Weren't locations in middle earth based on places around the UK when Tolkein wrote the books?
Mordor was Basingstoke.
rofl I live in Basingstoke, from now on I'm going to refer to it as Mordor!
"One does not simply walk into Basingstoke" hasn't got the same ring to it, has it? scratchchin

rich1231

17,331 posts

261 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Stupid Unions, could cost them badly.

Still, we've got some great mountains in Scotland. And no shortage of extras with hairy feet.
And what will the men do?

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all

The 'Shire...


Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
Halb said:
davido140 said:
Weren't locations in middle earth based on places around the UK when Tolkein wrote the books?
The English bits like the Shire were parts of where he grew up, and the goblins technology was the way industrialisation was moving through the Midlands. Doubt he lived near anything like the Lonely mountain or the Misty Mountains.biggrin
edit, though I think the desolation of Smaug may also be connect to industrialisation.

Edited by Halb on Monday 25th October 09:58
No, Aberdeenshire!
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shire_%28Middle-earth...

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Bits of Berkshire, too. There's a house named Rivendell (ffs!) in between Pangbourne and Upper Basildon where Chris Tolkein lives. Or at least did when I was living around there about 10 years ago.

The Lukas

2,773 posts

195 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
I think it should stay in New Zealand. They did a good job with LOTR. At least allot of the stuff wasn't animated, but being filmed in Britain, the Lonely Mountain, the Misty Mountains, Rivendel...I can't see it. The story is English, and allot of it is based here, but in epic proportions. Do we really have the landscape?

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Halb said:
ViperPict said:
Halb said:
davido140 said:
Weren't locations in middle earth based on places around the UK when Tolkein wrote the books?
The English bits like the Shire were parts of where he grew up, and the goblins technology was the way industrialisation was moving through the Midlands. Doubt he lived near anything like the Lonely mountain or the Misty Mountains.biggrin
edit, though I think the desolation of Smaug may also be connect to industrialisation.

Edited by Halb on Monday 25th October 09:58
No, Aberdeenshire!
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shire_%28Middle-earth...
Absolute speculative Wikipedia nonsense. Tolkein never spoke of his inspirations for the locations. But he spent a lot of time in Aberdeenshire which has the rolling hills of the Middle Earth shire that home counties and the west Midlands don't. Word.

grumbledoak

31,548 posts

234 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
So where did he imagine Mordor was, Hull?

Ok, fair point.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
which has the rolling hills of the Middle Earth shire that home counties and the west Midlands don't.
Apart from the Chilterns.

And the Downs.

No idea about West Mids, to be honest, but Berkshire certainly does have "rolling hills".

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
ViperPict said:
which has the rolling hills of the Middle Earth shire that home counties and the west Midlands don't.
Apart from the Chilterns.

And the Downs.

No idea about West Mids, to be honest, but Berkshire certainly does have "rolling hills".
Still not having it. Not rollingly hilly enough. Definitely Aberdeenshire! biggrin

durbster

10,288 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
I'm sure Britain is pretty enough but the main problem is that there are very few places you could film that wouldn't have something in the background. Because New Zealand only has a population of 9 people, it's quite easy to shoot there without having to worry about pylons, villages, roads, signs etc. being in the background.

Removing them is an expensive and time-consuming process, so it's better that they're not there in the first place.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
durbster said:
I'm sure Britain is pretty enough but the main problem is that there are very few places you could film that wouldn't have something in the background. Because New Zealand only has a population of 9 people, it's quite easy to shoot there without having to worry about pylons, villages, roads, signs etc. being in the background.

Removing them is an expensive and time-consuming process, so it's better that they're not there in the first place.
Those issues are not a big issue in film production these days, as long as they're minor things like pylons etc. I've worked on two films where the general location (Scottish Highlands) was far more important than the presence of minor inidcations of development in the background.

otolith

56,206 posts

205 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
T. A. Shippey's "The Road To Middle Earth" has a whole chapter on Tolkien's use of geography and the derivation from real English places - most of those relating to the Shire being fairly closely distributed round Oxford. The willow fringed lowland rivers - Tolkien described Tom Bombadil in his letters as "the spirit of the (vanishing) Oxford and Berkshire countryside", the Barrow Downs (the Berkshire Downs, 15 miles from Oxford, have the highest concentration of barrows in the country), the use of real English place names, etc, all pretty much nail down where the Shire is an analogue for.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all

Place names perhaps but when you read Tolkein's own descriptions of the geography of the Shire, it's far closer to Aberdeenshire than Oxfordshire! And he did spend a lot of time here and one of his main inspirations cam from here.

AlexS

1,552 posts

233 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
So where does the Forest of Dean fit into the areas of the UK which inspired Tolkien?

thatone1967

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
durbster said:
I'm sure Britain is pretty enough but the main problem is that there are very few places you could film that wouldn't have something in the background. Because New Zealand only has a population of 9 people, it's quite easy to shoot there without having to worry about pylons, villages, roads, signs etc. being in the background.

Removing them is an expensive and time-consuming process, so it's better that they're not there in the first place.
Isn't Harry Potter filmed here? I know at least some of it is...

ViperPict

10,087 posts

238 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
thatone1967 said:
durbster said:
I'm sure Britain is pretty enough but the main problem is that there are very few places you could film that wouldn't have something in the background. Because New Zealand only has a population of 9 people, it's quite easy to shoot there without having to worry about pylons, villages, roads, signs etc. being in the background.

Removing them is an expensive and time-consuming process, so it's better that they're not there in the first place.
Isn't Harry Potter filmed here? I know at least some of it is...
I worked on one film recently on the west coast in the Highlands. A Roman period film. But on one day there was an MoD military exercise going on close to the shore - submarines, helicopters, ships, the lot! They still fimed though and said it would be easy to edit out.

durbster

10,288 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
thatone1967 said:
Isn't Harry Potter filmed here? I know at least some of it is...
Err... I've only seen one of them but isn't it set in the present day? Doesn't really matter that there are buildings in the background then biggrin

Even if it is easy to remove I still think that, given a choice, it would be preferable for it not to be there in the first place.

I visited Hobbiton set in New Zealand and I remember them saying the only sign of modern life was a barn about a mile ago, so they stuck a bush on top of it. Sorted biggrin

Matt..

3,602 posts

190 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
I think they should keep it in NZ smile They love it there and never stop going on about it, so it would be a shame for it to be moved.