10 O'Clock show rant
Discussion
Conian said:
EDLT said:
CivicMan said:
David Mitchell....
I used to think he was fairly sensible, but he's fallen into the old "I'm on TV and therefore a voice of the people" trap.The sketch show 'That Mitchell and Webb Look' is crap by comparison.
g3org3y said:
Conian said:
EDLT said:
CivicMan said:
David Mitchell....
I used to think he was fairly sensible, but he's fallen into the old "I'm on TV and therefore a voice of the people" trap.The sketch show 'That Mitchell and Webb Look' is crap by comparison.
So very disappointing. The potential for this to be so good was there, but instead it's lazy, pedestrian, predictable, MOR Grauniad leftist bks. Worse than that is most of it's not funny. Jimmy Carr recycling unfunny jokes that the 2 Ronnies did 40 years ago is not what I expect from C4 satire at 10pm. By all means they should be ripping the government a new ahole weekly(I thought DM let Grant Shapps the housing minister have a really easy ride for no discernable reason), but the opposition should be equally put to the sword for being utterly ste.
Must try (a lot) harder.
Must try (a lot) harder.
I still watch it now and again (well, for a bit of time at least) and saw a glimpse last week that had me laughing, with some leftie woman explaining how people don't know if they eat a McDonalds they will get fat - then the other bloke on the panel just said "only if they are stupid".....
g3org3y said:
The sketch show 'That Mitchell and Webb Look' is crap by comparison.
David Mitchell is probably the only writer around that can get the line "If there's one thing a thousand miles of retreat has taught us, it's that Russian agriculture is in desperate need of mechanisation" into a sketch and get a laugh from it.10 o'clock show does blow though.
More painfully unfunny and tediously leftwing bks, leavened by Charlie Brooker shoehorning a truly golden phrase into a piece about the 'no more cuts' protests.
- epitomised by Ms Laverne delivering a dreary monologue which ended with the biting satire, '..., sink the Belgrano, and close all the coalmines'. I can't even begin to comment without wanting to inflict pain on the scriptmonkey. Even the lobotomised audience barely tittered.
- Charlie commenting about the gross sensationalisation of the yobs making a mess at Fortnum and Mason, 'With their need for drama, the Media lapped it all up like a thirsty dog at a Bukakke party.'
- epitomised by Ms Laverne delivering a dreary monologue which ended with the biting satire, '..., sink the Belgrano, and close all the coalmines'. I can't even begin to comment without wanting to inflict pain on the scriptmonkey. Even the lobotomised audience barely tittered.
- Charlie commenting about the gross sensationalisation of the yobs making a mess at Fortnum and Mason, 'With their need for drama, the Media lapped it all up like a thirsty dog at a Bukakke party.'
hidetheelephants said:
- Charlie commenting about the gross sensationalisation of the yobs making a mess at Fortnum and Mason, 'With their need for drama, the Media lapped it all up like a thirsty dog at a Bukakke party.'
I think he is spot on aboot the media, it seems to be his main bugbear, the fact they just go for the violence and hype it up (in Haiti, in Japan-that bit where Sky made it like a film was weird). I thoight the sex version was very funnyI don't listen to the girl I just ff her bits because I find them boring
With the folk that it has in it, it should be much, much better.
I love Brooker's other stuff, Carr is a great stand up, Mitchell is an intelligent, perceptive wit and laverne has her moments, most of them aesthetic.
The end result manages to be a disappointment however. Much less than the sum of its parts.
I love Brooker's other stuff, Carr is a great stand up, Mitchell is an intelligent, perceptive wit and laverne has her moments, most of them aesthetic.
The end result manages to be a disappointment however. Much less than the sum of its parts.
adycav said:
With the folk that it has in it, it should be much, much better.
I love Brooker's other stuff, Carr is a great stand up, Mitchell is an intelligent, perceptive wit and laverne has her moments, most of them aesthetic.
The end result manages to be a disappointment however. Much less than the sum of its parts.
Succinctly put; the scriptmonkeys need shooting. The writing is where a show like this succeeds or sucks like a black hole; this sucks, too much of it is lazy, derivative and simply not funny.I love Brooker's other stuff, Carr is a great stand up, Mitchell is an intelligent, perceptive wit and laverne has her moments, most of them aesthetic.
The end result manages to be a disappointment however. Much less than the sum of its parts.
hidetheelephants said:
Succinctly put; the scriptmonkeys need shooting. The writing is where a show like this succeeds or sucks like a black hole; this sucks, too much of it is lazy, derivative and simply not funny.
Writing not so bad, concept was terrible. Having an audience was an awful idea. Everybody was playing to them, which really doesn't help to get points across. Brooker, Carr and Mitchell (best comic talent around in my book) are all really funny guys but laverne is so wooden and just slows the show down. The worst mistake though is the audience. Shouldn't be there in the first place and certainly shouldn't be made up of dimwit students. The performers are all 30 something adults, so why not aim the show at adults.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff