Chris Huhne... going soon?
Discussion
turbobloke said:
singlecoil said:
The other side of the argument, the one in favour of prison sentences for points-swapping, would be more convincing if it didn't come mainly from those who make no secret of their loathing for Huhne.
Desperate and ineffective.I would apply the same principles to the Pope or Mary Poppins.
Chim-Chim-fking-Cher-Ee
longblackcoat said:
turbobloke said:
singlecoil said:
The other side of the argument, the one in favour of prison sentences for points-swapping, would be more convincing if it didn't come mainly from those who make no secret of their loathing for Huhne.
Desperate and ineffective.I would apply the same principles to the Pope or Mary Poppins.
Chim-Chim-fking-Cher-Ee
turbobloke said:
singlecoil said:
The other side of the argument, the one in favour of prison sentences for points-swapping, would be more convincing if it didn't come mainly from those who make no secret of their loathing for Huhne.
Desperate and ineffective.I would apply the same principles to the Pope or Mary Poppins.
boring when people restrict their support for their position to negative comments about the opponent's position
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Can I just interject here to ask what you expect to get from this thread? You have your views, clearly, and seem willing to talk the thread to death is what seems like a ceaseless attempt to get the last word. If you've had some pretty decent legal minds fail to convince you of their point of view, and have equally failed to convince said people of your point of view, is it not time to move on?
longblackcoat said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Can I just interject here to ask what you expect to get from this thread? You have your views, clearly, and seem willing to talk the thread to death is what seems like a ceaseless attempt to get the last word. If you've had some pretty decent legal minds fail to convince you of their point of view, and have equally failed to convince said people of your point of view, is it not time to move on?
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Well to reiterate. You say all you are asking for is a sliding scale.
It's then demonstrated, once again, that there is a sliding scale in place.
You reply that you need to see specific data relating to the specific offence.
Again you are reminded that a sliding scale does operate in relation to that specific offence and there is a means whereby you can obtain that data and ask for a modification.
But you repeatedly, when asked over many months, wilfully refuse to answer what your specific proposals are.
Firstly saying it needs minor adjustment only. Then when pressed saying it needs careful drafting. Then reverting to complaining nobody understands you.
Sorry but the credibility and deliberate obtuseness displayed reaches new depths.
As far as I am concerned the position is that the guidelines already are that PtCoJ in relation to speeding could attract a custodial sentence but don't always dependent upon mitigating or aggravating factors specific to the case.
As it is you who wants a change it's your job to propose the wording. Seeing the amount of input so far from you on this thread it is a cop out to reply well it would need careful drafting.
By all means revert to the ad homs you posted many hundred pages ago. I have broad shoulders and a thick skin but by no means unhinged.
Good day.
turbobloke said:
The thing is, that's not right.
The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
Then you will have no problem either summing these 'addressings' up here, or quoting them.The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
I'll be amazed if you do either.
singlecoil said:
turbobloke said:
The thing is, that's not right.
The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
Then you will have no problem either summing these 'addressings' up here, or quoting them.The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
I'll be amazed if you do either.
Do you really expect anyone to go back through the thread just to copy and then paste what they've already said n times just because you ask? If you didn't get it on those n occasions there's little prospect now.
That doesn't excuse the facile reasoning by assertion 'nobody has addressed anything' which was certainly delivered deadpan in your post but it's better suited to a bedpan.
Re-read the existing replies to your tendentious offerings, over many pages of this thread, this time for understanding.
Enjoy your amazement when you re-read relevant posts
turbobloke said:
singlecoil said:
turbobloke said:
The thing is, that's not right.
The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
Then you will have no problem either summing these 'addressings' up here, or quoting them.The non-points you make have been addressed genuinely and repeatedly and then again
Based on your post above, you appear to have started trolling in earnest at this point.
I'll be amazed if you do either.
Do you really expect anyone to go back through the thread just to copy and then paste what they've already said n times just because you ask? If you didn't get it on those n occasions there's little prospect now.
That doesn't excuse the facile reasoning by assertion 'nobody has addressed anything' which was certainly delivered deadpan in your post but it's better suited to a bedpan.
Re-read the existing replies to your tendentious offerings, over many pages of this thread, this time for understanding.
Enjoy your amazement when you re-read relevant posts
You've had your head nailed to the coffee table, but you are still wriggling.
singlecoil said:
That was so predictable as to be very predictable indeed.
Irony meter off the scale.singlecoil said:
You've had your head nailed to the coffee table, but you are still wriggling.
Mrs TB is having lunch using the coffee table. No nails in sight You've had your non-points nailed on this thread, which is why you now post as a childishly offensive troll. Good work!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff