Directors' pay up 50% in a YEAR

Directors' pay up 50% in a YEAR

Author
Discussion

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
What no thread? scratchchin

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15487866

yikes

I'm merely the director of one company and my pay hasn't gone up at all. What am I doing wrong, multiple-directorship fellow PHers? I want to further increase the distance between myself and the hoi polloi and lavish myself with extra cash from the company coffers.

Randy Winkman

16,169 posts

190 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
What no thread? scratchchin
There's a thread with a title that doesn't really tell you what it's about. Since this is PH though, it's not that busy there.

Shaw Tarse

31,543 posts

204 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all

don4l

10,058 posts

177 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
There is already a thread running, but it is so badly titled that it is difficult to find.


Mods, lock the other thread, please.


I look forward to the lefties getting agitated.


Don
--

dandarez

13,293 posts

284 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Read it again, it's pay for directors of the top 100 FTSE companies.
Average pay is a little above mine.

£2.7 million!

Randy Winkman

16,169 posts

190 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Some bod on the radio was defending it by saying "it's the same everywhere". So we're being screwed the world over ... great.

dandarez

13,293 posts

284 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
don4l said:
There is already a thread running, but it is so badly titled that it is difficult to find.


Mods, lock the other thread, please.


I look forward to the lefties getting agitated.


Don
--
I thought PHs was dominated by (I'm) 'all righties'?

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
I believe someone in Reckitt Benkiser did very well and that comp is the adarling of the markets doing everything right.

Range extenders
Bringing back great brands to the market
Smart innovation
Constant flow of New product development.

Im a fan but have zero affiliation

don4l

10,058 posts

177 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
dandarez said:
I thought PHs was dominated by (I'm) 'all righties'?
True. Most PH'ers are not afraid of a hard day's honest work. Therefore, they are probably/deservedly "all rightie".

Don
--

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The CEO has the vision and drive for the change.
His/her team below try to make that vision a reality.
CEO can only succeed (as in make the company do well) if the right team is in place.

bobbylondonuk

2,199 posts

191 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Top boardroom pay avg of 2.7m for a FTSE 100 company?? What is the big story here?

Managing billions in different markets and handling 10's of thousands of employees worldwide is not a joke. I guess is sells papers and politicians get some free PR.

TTwiggy

11,548 posts

205 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I suppose it could be argued that a football team is actually a perfect exmaple of 'the workers' sharing directly in the success.

If Liverpool followed the principal of many large corporations, Kenny Dalglish would be on £30m a year, while Steven Gerrard would pick up £13.75 per hour wink

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Also there is the risk IF for whatever reason the company tanks then the CEO of that company will find it extremely hard to find another role in the future... ie he was commander and chief.

Randy Winkman

16,169 posts

190 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
bobbylondonuk said:
Top boardroom pay avg of 2.7m for a FTSE 100 company?? What is the big story here?

Managing billions in different markets and handling 10's of thousands of employees worldwide is not a joke. I guess is sells papers and politicians get some free PR.
But are they doing 50% better than last year?

Council Baby

19,741 posts

191 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
I believe someone in Reckitt Benkiser did very well and that comp is the adarling of the markets doing everything right.

Range extenders
Bringing back great brands to the market
Smart innovation
Constant flow of New product development.

Im a fan but have zero affiliation
I'm guessing they refer to Rakesh Kapoor, the new CEO, who is a bargain compared to Bart Becht who took home double the previous year.

Nothing wrong with the people at the top of the tree in big business getting paid big bucks.

maix27

1,070 posts

197 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
bobbylondonuk said:
Top boardroom pay avg of 2.7m for a FTSE 100 company?? What is the big story here?

Managing billions in different markets and handling 10's of thousands of employees worldwide is not a joke. I guess is sells papers and politicians get some free PR.
I think you're missing the point. It's people getting paid more while their company does worse.

I'd love all jobs to work like that but they don't. That's the point.

Also, how many extra employees could have been retained (if redundancies have been made) for that 49% rise in salary for someone who clearly isn't running the company well (based purely on the fact that they've had to make redundancies and therefore they've either run the company badly or have lacked the foresight I associate with a 2.7m pay packet).


tomw2000

2,508 posts

196 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
If an individual in the private sector, has managed to negociate him/herself a deal whereby he/she earns £2.7mil - good on them and it's nothing to do with me.

IF Civil servants, public sector employees are earning big bucks. I wanna know what they're doing.

Funny the BBC is reporting this in this way.

CzechItOut

2,154 posts

192 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
maix27 said:
Also, how many extra employees could have been retained (if redundancies have been made) for that 49% rise in salary for someone who clearly isn't running the company well (based purely on the fact that they've had to make redundancies and therefore they've either run the company badly or have lacked the foresight I associate with a 2.7m pay packet).
64

TTwiggy

11,548 posts

205 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You're quite abrasive, aren't you?

It was a tongue in cheek comment, hence the smiley. For the record, I don't think your comparison bears any scrutiny. A football team is nothing like a FTSE company. The players are not 'directors', the manager is not a 'CEO', the bloke on the turnstile is not the 'factory floor' worker. It's enterntainmemt, and poeple are paid relative to their marketable value - you may as well bring the 'salaries' of Hollywood stars into this.

ninja-lewis

4,242 posts

191 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
About two-thirds of earnings in the FTSE 100 are from overseas.

You have about a dozen or so major mining/oil & gas/commodities firms that effectively have no presence in the UK beyond their listing. Quite a few Russian firms joining in the LSE in particular.

Then UK businesses like Diageo, Vodafone and HSBC who do most of their business overseas.

There aren't that many firms like J Sainsburys, where most of their business is in the UK, left in the FTSE100

You just have to look at the recent rubbish about FTSE100 companies operating in tax havens. Only 2 didn't have any presence in a tax haven: one was a Mexican mining firm and the other was a UK firm that only operates in the UK. The other 98 all had some international presence in multiple countries.